Forum Forum Home Bandit’s Posts Today’s Posts

[Huntball WANTED $7 Outlaw]

Hi all just a quick one I have been paying the extra to get a feature on some games but actually seems to be the same amount of time if you don’t what do all think ?

[JohnoG WANTED $3 Outlaw]

Had this debate with her in doors recently so we tested it.

Game we chose was wild wild riches.

We were on the same site (Corals) and played 2 lots of 200 spins simultaneously – this was the results.

Me 200 spins @ 50p wild/wild came in 9 times and bonused twice.

Her indoors 200 spins with button activated @ 60p wild/wild came in 7 times and only 1 bonus.

Me 200 spins with button @ 60p wild/wild came in 5 times – no bonus

Her indoors 200 spins @ 50p wild/wild came in 9 times – 2 bonuses.

 

Conclusion – will never play with button activated ever again!!

 

 

 

 

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

If it wasnt double chance then they would not have been able to licence the game. Both casino and game provider would get fucked so hard, especially in the UK. People trying to test it will never be able to accurately do so. They would need to test playing millions and millions of spins to get a big enough sample where variance isn’t playing a part.

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Dynamik23 wrote:

If it wasnt double chance then they would not have been able to licence the game. Both casino and game provider would get fucked so hard, especially in the UK. People trying to test it will never be able to accurately do so. They would need to test playing millions and millions of spins to get a big enough sample where variance isn’t playing a part.

100% this,  dynamik spot on, with variance, blind luck and “being on  the right game at the right time” you could never test the theory in 100-200 spins, and comparing your play to your wife’s game is just totally pointless as each spin is random and “unique” and to test it you both need to be On the same track to recognise any difference bumps ( which mathematically can’t happen ) your wife could have bonuses 5 times in 100 spins and nothing then for 500, you might not bonus in the first 100 but then get two or three in the next 500…….. it’s just un testable….but if it didn’t work or have an effect it couldn’t be used as it would be a scam and ( at least )  Ukgc would be smashing on it.

but slots are about how you feel, if you feel strongly one way then go that way.

[JohnoG WANTED $3 Outlaw]

Understand that, but if it’s untestable, how do UKGC monitor it?

Pragmatic is the provider for wild wild riches. Take a look at how Big Bass has been playing now compared to 3 weeks ago. Me and wifey have literally smashed this game as always hitting bonus and more often than not you get to level 2 and 3. Recently not getting passed first level, and this week we have started getting bonuses where fisherman doesn’t show up at all – 100% convinced they have changed this game!!!

 

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Dynamik23 wrote:

If it wasnt double chance then they would not have been able to licence the game. Both casino and game provider would get fucked so hard, especially in the UK. People trying to test it will never be able to accurately do so. They would need to test playing millions and millions of spins to get a big enough sample where variance isn’t playing a part.

100% this,  dynamik spot on, with variance, blind luck and “being on  the right game at the right time” you could never test the theory in 100-200 spins, and comparing your play to your wife’s game is just totally pointless as each spin is random and “unique” and to test it you both need to be On the same track to recognise any difference bumps ( which mathematically can’t happen ) your wife could have bonuses 5 times in 100 spins and nothing then for 500, you might not bonus in the first 100 but then get two or three in the next 500…….. it’s just un testable….but if it didn’t work or have an effect it couldn’t be used as it would be a scam and ( at least )  Ukgc would be smashing on it.

but slots are about how you feel, if you feel strongly one way then go that way.

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

JohnoG wrote:

Understand that, but if it’s untestable, how do UKGC monitor it?

Pragmatic is the provider for wild wild riches. Take a look at how Big Bass has been playing now compared to 3 weeks ago. Me and wifey have literally smashed this game as always hitting bonus and more often than not you get to level 2 and 3. Recently not getting passed first level, and this week we have started getting bonuses where fisherman doesn’t show up at all – 100% convinced they have changed this game!!!

 

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Dynamik23 wrote:

If it wasnt double chance then they would not have been able to licence the game. Both casino and game provider would get fucked so hard, especially in the UK. People trying to test it will never be able to accurately do so. They would need to test playing millions and millions of spins to get a big enough sample where variance isn’t playing a part.

100% this,  dynamik spot on, with variance, blind luck and “being on  the right game at the right time” you could never test the theory in 100-200 spins, and comparing your play to your wife’s game is just totally pointless as each spin is random and “unique” and to test it you both need to be On the same track to recognise any difference bumps ( which mathematically can’t happen ) your wife could have bonuses 5 times in 100 spins and nothing then for 500, you might not bonus in the first 100 but then get two or three in the next 500…….. it’s just un testable….but if it didn’t work or have an effect it couldn’t be used as it would be a scam and ( at least )  Ukgc would be smashing on it.

but slots are about how you feel, if you feel strongly one way then go that way.

I meant untestable for us on a realistic level, you’d need millions of spins to average out the outcome, There’s a mechanic/formula submitted, and that formula has the potential of being tested by officials and its data collected around the world day by day and looked into at anytime so it’s in the companies interested to keep clean ..equally the games are put through millions of spins before release and it’s data suggests the games ability to follow its own rules…ukgc is very strict so it’s always a better bet that a game you can play  in the uk ( on a reputable site) is probably genuine and on the level.

importantly tho, you have to be careful you don’t convince your self of “company dirty tricks” when it’s simply a bad run, look at any bandit chilli games, some times he could top purple three or four times and other times it took him 15 spins just to get out of the green and had to collect blue or red because of the run he was on … the good luck always has a down time… personally I’m not seeing a difference in wild and bass, sometimes they land early, sometime around what I expect and sometimes the game struggles to pull it out,

[Author]

Posts