Forum Forum Home Bandit’s Posts Today’s Posts

[Anonymous WANTED $110 Inactive]

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

GameRoom wrote:

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

GameRoom wrote:

Xbobmad wrote:

When bandit verifies, will that legitimise the service or get him the same dogs abuse that chip gets. It doesn’t work both ways, so people gotta make your choice.

don’t be stupid we are here for Bandit not for Chip…If I want to support Chip I will go to his forum and join all his links..I will not come here to support Bandit…..Bandit is on High-level pls don’t compare Chip with Bandit or RockNRoall…If you are FanBoy of Chip and trying everything to push in here to like Chip you only doing damage to Bandit forum and him…so pls stop all the BS about Chip you cant force anyone to like him

This isn’t what Bob is saying, think you’ve miss read his intentions, what I think  he’s saying is

because people don’t like chip, it wouldn’t matter who did the checks, if they came back and verified him as legitimate the chip  “ haters” would then start hating the company doing the checks,

because they feel that chip isn’t honest, any organisation who verified him would instantly be corrupt in their eyes  (even tho they might have  verified a streamer they liked and that was fine) ….. so if a company verified  bandit (a streamer you like ) and that is fine, you can’t then call them dirty if  they Verify  a streamer you don’t like….they would use the same System for both so it’s either all correct or not at all….we use feelings to work out if we trust streamers, the company would  use “facts” so unless people understand there a  0.0001% he is legit and if he is they’ll just have to move on, then there is no organisation that can over turn your feelings towards him even if factually they say he is legit……

even in this thread you see people mention that files can be changed and corrupted and altered, there’s already a reason to not trust the system…

so what I think Bob is saying is that regardless of what ever system of verification we have and who does it. unless they give us  the result we believe it should ( on people we don’t like ) we will never agree with it and the conversation will never end…

Personally I don’t like the chip product, I don’t know the dude, I do believe it’s affiliated cash he’s using and he’s not the kind of energy i enjoy… so I’d find it hard to believe that any company would find him legit, but I have to keep a % that he might be, because facts trump feelings …( but I doubt it)

when I read comments like this show who they get verified and flag by forums is not a good start, I am sure is more out there on RocknRolla Forum is like 20 pages to read

I agree with you 100%…

if these guys check abet more and do not give easy verification badges they will be more respectful of what they do… but 3 streamers got verified 2 are playing on casinos know they can only play on fake money add by a casino and another one balance jump for £10k well streaming..I know is hard to check someone like chip he posts 4-5 videos and 1 stream every 12hrs, but I don’t think someone like Bandit RockNRolla will credit from this, they will only give credit to this page and they will give credit to all other streamers they use this verification page…Proving you are real stream is very easy start stream login to all your casinos and show what you did on past in-out up-down just like Bandit or Rolla did meany times on past

I also think they should get a streamer category  A Bandit Rolla  B other streamer C ….  so on you cant have someone streaming for 5-6 years and be the same category with someone start 3-4 weeks ago

and value what casino they playing if is a shit casino or a bad casino, do casinos offer fake money or not…so new players will know what casino Bandit Rolla will play  is it worth supporting or start playing on casinos they play, they also will know who is top UK streamers

[thunderball6 WANTED $272 Outlaw]

Congrats to chipmunkz  on his dead or alive 2 wild line.

[Slot WANTED $47 Outlaw]

thunderball6 wrote:

Congrats to chipmunkz  on his dead or alive 2 wild line.

fake money he cant withdraw

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

GameRoom wrote:

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

GameRoom wrote:

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

GameRoom wrote:

Xbobmad wrote:

When bandit verifies, will that legitimise the service or get him the same dogs abuse that chip gets. It doesn’t work both ways, so people gotta make your choice.

don’t be stupid we are here for Bandit not for Chip…If I want to support Chip I will go to his forum and join all his links..I will not come here to support Bandit…..Bandit is on High-level pls don’t compare Chip with Bandit or RockNRoall…If you are FanBoy of Chip and trying everything to push in here to like Chip you only doing damage to Bandit forum and him…so pls stop all the BS about Chip you cant force anyone to like him

This isn’t what Bob is saying, think you’ve miss read his intentions, what I think  he’s saying is

because people don’t like chip, it wouldn’t matter who did the checks, if they came back and verified him as legitimate the chip  “ haters” would then start hating the company doing the checks,

because they feel that chip isn’t honest, any organisation who verified him would instantly be corrupt in their eyes  (even tho they might have  verified a streamer they liked and that was fine) ….. so if a company verified  bandit (a streamer you like ) and that is fine, you can’t then call them dirty if  they Verify  a streamer you don’t like….they would use the same System for both so it’s either all correct or not at all….we use feelings to work out if we trust streamers, the company would  use “facts” so unless people understand there a  0.0001% he is legit and if he is they’ll just have to move on, then there is no organisation that can over turn your feelings towards him even if factually they say he is legit……

even in this thread you see people mention that files can be changed and corrupted and altered, there’s already a reason to not trust the system…

so what I think Bob is saying is that regardless of what ever system of verification we have and who does it. unless they give us  the result we believe it should ( on people we don’t like ) we will never agree with it and the conversation will never end…

Personally I don’t like the chip product, I don’t know the dude, I do believe it’s affiliated cash he’s using and he’s not the kind of energy i enjoy… so I’d find it hard to believe that any company would find him legit, but I have to keep a % that he might be, because facts trump feelings …( but I doubt it)

when I read comments like this show who they get verified and flag by forums is not a good start, I am sure is more out there on RocknRolla Forum is like 20 pages to read

I agree with you 100%…

if these guys check abet more and do not give easy verification badges they will be more respectful of what they do… but 3 streamers got verified 2 are playing on casinos know they can only play on fake money add by a casino and another one balance jump for £10k well streaming..I know is hard to check someone like chip he posts 4-5 videos and 1 stream every 12hrs, but I don’t think someone like Bandit RockNRolla will credit from this, they will only give credit to this page and they will give credit to all other streamers they use this verification page…Proving you are real stream is very easy start stream login to all your casinos and show what you did on past in-out up-down just like Bandit or Rolla did meany times on past

I also think they should get a streamer category  A Bandit Rolla  B other streamer C ….  so on you cant have someone streaming for 5-6 years and be the same category with someone start 3-4 weeks ago

and value what casino they playing if is a shit casino or a bad casino, do casinos offer fake money or not…so new players will know what casino Bandit Rolla will play  is it worth supporting or start playing on casinos they play, they also will know who is top UK streamers

Yeah i agree, i can see massive black holes in the verifying idea, to me it’s like employee of the month, it means fuck all to anybody out side, the see it, think “ that’s nice “ and basically as long as you turn up on time you’ll get it one day….

<span style=”font-size: 1rem;”>but some people will need to see the tick  or the crosses before they understand what good streamers give and what bad streamers do, like I need to see ukgc stamp on casinos before I consider using them( but saying that I’ve been  very vocal about how strong I think their rules have been )</span>

like I said I don’t think you will ever find a company that can produce these verification that every person will agree with, so I think companies like yours above will flourish ….

[Ma MaskWearer WANTED $42 Blocked]

Wow Chip got verified as a “real player”

That ruins any credibility this scheme has (IDK eejit but sorry man)

There is definitive proof that Chip has used fake funds by playing at certain casinos (Lord Ping etc, whom he kept saying, “was a great casino”). He has signed up to so many dodgy casinos and networks. Most of these casinos have sanctions against them by UKGC for breaking various laws. The truth is it costs a company less to pay the fines than it does to comply with the law, as is the case in many industries (e.g. water and sewage treatment, where we wouldn’t believe our companies would dump raw sewage into rivers and the sea, but they do, and have contaminated vast areas)

When we have multiple proofs of Chip using fake funds it’s the same as catching an athlete cheating with PEDs. Sure, that athlete may have only used PEDs once or a few times, but they are still a cheat. To verify them to the same level as a clean athlete is an insult to everyone involved. Chip is a dirty, scheming little so and so. He used to bet on 40p and thought it nosebleed stakes then gets on dodgy casinos at £40/spin. For anyone who believes that is real money play, I seriously pity you

There’s also the issue about being paid to do streams, as is the case with Chip. If you get paid £1000 per stream and deposit £1000, have you gambled at all? No you haven’t, even if you lose the roll you are break-even. To gamble, something has to be risked. The casinos and streamers can manipulate payments and backhanders so it appears legit but it’s still fake money, fake advertising and scumbag casinos/streamers

[Slot WANTED $47 Outlaw]

MaskWearer wrote:

Wow Chip got verified as a “real player”

That ruins any credibility this scheme has (IDK eejit but sorry man)

There is definitive proof that Chip has used fake funds by playing at certain casinos (Lord Ping etc, whom he kept saying, “was a great casino”). He has signed up to so many dodgy casinos and networks. Most of these casinos have sanctions against them by UKGC for breaking various laws. The truth is it costs a company less to pay the fines than it does to comply with the law, as is the case in many industries (e.g. water and sewage treatment, where we wouldn’t believe our companies would dump raw sewage into rivers and the sea, but they do, and have contaminated vast areas)

When we have multiple proofs of Chip using fake funds it’s the same as catching an athlete cheating with PEDs. Sure, that athlete may have only used PEDs once or a few times, but they are still a cheat. To verify them to the same level as a clean athlete is an insult to everyone involved. Chip is a dirty, scheming little so and so. He used to bet on 40p and thought it nosebleed stakes then gets on dodgy casinos at £40/spin. For anyone who believes that is real money play, I seriously pity you

There’s also the issue about being paid to do streams, as is the case with Chip. If you get paid £1000 per stream and deposit £1000, have you gambled at all? No you haven’t, even if you lose the roll you are break-even. To gamble, something has to be risked. The casinos and streamers can manipulate payments and backhanders so it appears legit but it’s still fake money, fake advertising and scumbag casinos/streamers

Don’t talk bad about chip and fake streamers they will ban you from forum

[St Steller WANTED $34 Outlaw]

igc-rm wrote:

Steller wrote:

Bandit, Hypalinx and Stop and Step (much prefer his betting shop vids)  are all geuine and the the only onliine streamers i watch these days.  Also enjoy several others who post vids from the bookies and arcades. Its where i do my gambling so i can relatte to the stakes they play. Btw, anyone know whats happened to 7 Neighbours? Hasn’t posted a vid in over 2 weeks, which is most unlike him.

I was wondering the same, not seeing anything from Ross since 1st week of this month. He did a collab with hypa and co. No posts on @shitter either. You could reach out to trono or hypa and see if they have any idea. Hope he is a ok.

bigbucks1983 wrote:

Unless its done by an official body like the UKGC it is an utterly pointless venture. From what I have seen there is far too much room to bend the truth and get around the requirements. Christ I think you only need to prove deposits/withdrawals for one stream to be bronze verified. If you’re in bed with the casino and any good with photo shop then that’s a doddle to bosh out. It also doesn’t highlight streamers who might use a 5x bonus to allow them to spin much higher than normal but risk nothing knowing their affiliate income will far outweigh the loss and they stay relevant. Technically they’ve deposited their own money and if they beat wagering can withdraw but its not the same deal we all get, not the same risk and so they shouldn’t be verified, but they will be.

Lovely idea but not one I see working. If dubious streamers are able to verify and then say they are legit then I’d say its actually counter productive. Only way of working is full auditing of lots of accounts which won’t happen.

I am partially gobsmacked that Phil has ventured into this behind the scenes hidden proof that you never see so can’t actually take as proof. Some people seem to be under the impression it has been done as a spoof to see which fakers sign up but then some people seem to think and it appears as if, it is supposed to be taken as real, as well as gospel.

Even done under the banner of protecting the real streamers. Which is pretty much the original gist of this thread. I mean, I know this thread intent is real but for all anyone knows, I am some shill, paid to write this shit. The difference for me is that I know I would never sell out. Some people willing do.

 

I see that 7 Neighbours returned last week with a vid. Says he’s just got bored of filming in the arcades and bingo halls. Shame because i enjoyed watching  him push for max spins. Would quite like to see Bandit do an arcade/bingo hall/bookies vid.

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Yeah he always talked about doing a Vegas one… but like everything, covid sat in to watch us…. Maybe once America gets a good leader who isn’t a twat or has a the beginning of goldfish brains and sorts their shit out …. Vegas might happen…be honest he could go to Llandudno north Wales and do one on the pier …what it  just like Vegas …. If you squint …. And look up at the sun for a few hours

[ig igc-rm WANTED $21 Outlaw]

Slot wrote:

<p>MaskWearer wrote:</p>

<p>Wow Chip got verified as a “real player”</p><p>That ruins any credibility this scheme has (IDK eejit but sorry man)</p><p>There is definitive proof that Chip has used fake funds by playing at certain casinos (Lord Ping etc, whom he kept saying, “was a great casino”). He has signed up to so many dodgy casinos and networks. Most of these casinos have sanctions against them by UKGC for breaking various laws. The truth is it costs a company less to pay the fines than it does to comply with the law, as is the case in many industries (e.g. water and sewage treatment, where we wouldn’t believe our companies would dump raw sewage into rivers and the sea, but they do, and have contaminated vast areas)</p><p>When we have multiple proofs of Chip using fake funds it’s the same as catching an athlete cheating with PEDs. Sure, that athlete may have only used PEDs once or a few times, but they are still a cheat. To verify them to the same level as a clean athlete is an insult to everyone involved. Chip is a dirty, scheming little so and so. He used to bet on 40p and thought it nosebleed stakes then gets on dodgy casinos at £40/spin. For anyone who believes that is real money play, I seriously pity you</p><p>There’s also the issue about being paid to do streams, as is the case with Chip. If you get paid £1000 per stream and deposit £1000, have you gambled at all? No you haven’t, even if you lose the roll you are break-even. To gamble, something has to be risked. The casinos and streamers can manipulate payments and backhanders so it appears legit but it’s still fake money, fake advertising and scumbag casinos/streamers</p>

<p>Don’t talk bad about chip and fake streamers they will ban you from forum</p>

Not quite true. If you have something to say that is true, you can say it. According to lots history here of people saying stuff. When it’s just insults, seedy will have a word. Everyone just tells him to fcuk off but you know. lol

Just a joke seedy, PUT THAT KNIFE SHAPED BAN HAMMER DOWN !

[Author]

Posts