-
AuthorPosts
-
14th June 2019 at 3:01 pm #69483
I don’t think the thread I created should have been locked, really. It wasn’t a call out thread or personally targeting anyone, it didn’t break any forum rules and it was a dedicated space to have the discourse of fairness Vs corruption so it wouldn’t spill over in to other threads. The aim was to have a thread for the civil discussion of that topic in a fact-based debate.
I have no objection to being told I’m wrong about something, provided the claim comes with supporting material to justify it. But if anyone says “you’re wrong and you have no facts” and that’s the entire response, why shouldn’t I post a list of facts which are on my side? I never start this drama, I just point out factual errors or logical flaws in other people’s unproven claims, in relation to a topic I think is both relevant and important to talk about on a gambling forum.
In response to this thread, I’m not going to pretend I get on with JB or that I think there’s validity to his claims, I don’t. I also think it rings hollow for him to claim he respects me barely half an hour after calling me a bell-end in another thread. However much he gets wound up by my responses to his posts about rigging/corruption/etc., I am always civil to him and don’t hurl insults. I do not always get the same basic civility in return. If not being able to rationally counter the content of my posts is something which makes him angry or upset, that’s not my problem and I’m not going to apologise for it.
In any other topic of discussion on the forum, there doesn’t tend to be friction between us, there are many threads we’ve both posted on which don’t end up in drama. I never aim to wind anyone up here, but I do and will continue to call out and argue anything I perceive as bullshit.
114th June 2019 at 3:57 pm #69497It was brought up before if you were going to post a thread like you did claiming facts their had to be “proof” in form of links or whatever just making a list and saying its fact wont cut it.
Fact 1 , trump dresses like a child
Fact 2 , yer dah sells avon
14th June 2019 at 4:41 pm #69514It’s not always as simple as posting a link – many of the facts I posted certainly can be easily referenced and verified by going on other websites, for example the Gambling Commission, whereas others for example as far as I know, there’s no Wiki page on how RTP works, but it is a distinct mathematical model I’ve explained in granular detail on this forum before.
14th June 2019 at 4:43 pm #69517It’s not always as simple as posting a link – many of the facts I posted certainly can be easily referenced and verified by going on other websites, for example the Gambling Commission, whereas others for example as far as I know, there’s no Wiki page on how RTP works, but it is a distinct mathematical model I’ve explained in granular detail on this forum before.
Must of missed that. ??
14th June 2019 at 4:59 pm #69523If that is the case then every website has a link. I dont disagree nor care with the argument but as it stands my fact i posted have as much substance as yours did
14th June 2019 at 5:03 pm #69524If that is the case then every website has a link. I dont disagree nor care with the argument but as it stands my fact i posted have as much substance as yours did
How? The first is a clear statement of subjective opinion (there are no facts in regards to one’s perception of style) and the other isn’t even a coherent English sentence. It doesn’t matter whether I included links or not, you can easily look up, download and read for yourself e.g. the GC’s technical design requirements, it takes one Google search. Other examples like RTP, the “link” is the previous posts on the forum where I’ve explained the maths in detail. Again, that I haven’t actually posted a convenient hyperlink doesn’t inhibit you from independently verifying the truth of that information.
14th June 2019 at 5:26 pm #69534Then its as simple a you googling the links and adding it in with your statements
14th June 2019 at 5:32 pm #69537Yeah, or I could go I’m posting on a forum and not submitting a scientific paper. If you doubt any of the facts I posted in that thread, please feel free to absolutely not take my word for it and go and verify for yourself. If you can’t be bothered, believe whatever you want to believe, it makes no difference to me.
14th June 2019 at 5:41 pm #69542Like i said already i couldn’t care less about the argument, you asked why it was locked and i answered with why i thought it was.
14th June 2019 at 6:04 pm #69546@Argyl
I take back what I said in this post. You are a total shit stirrer.
CBA with u.
14th June 2019 at 6:27 pm #6952514th June 2019 at 6:32 pm #69551@Argyl
I take back what I said in this post. You are a total shit stirrer.
CBA with u.
Hahaha
-
AuthorPosts
