-
11
I’ll say this, fair play to chip, he came on and addressed the questions i asked him.
I might not agree with his reasoning but at least he engaged it so repect to him.
He did make a distinct point in his latest high stake video to say dont try and copy him so hopefully that’s a step in the right direction.
Chip has “ chipped “ in on a few threads here, I think by now he’s using biam as a yard stick of his popularity or wether he said something stupid and needs to address it in a future videos
.i personally don’t watch chip, he isn’t the kind of content created that I find engaging, which is fine, he’s not make videos for me… but as an outsider, I remember talks of chip on here being quite positive not really that long ago. I seem to recall him having a break( ?) and lots of “ top lad” comments, but something change in how he was perceived and because I don’t follow him I’m not quite sure what ( or if anything) happened…but like many have said above( from a revenue point of view,) he obviously has an idea that something isn’t right in how he’s been seen, and addressing that could draw him more viewers, so these responses are nothing but positives for him,( if sincere ) but ultimately it’s wether people believe The answer are legit, or wether the answer he gave are generic a)b)c) responses that you could have predicted…..
I actually think he answered enough to confirm most suspicions people have. It might have been vague but there was enough acknowledgment and conjecture there. Hes basically admitted to a video fee or something being used to fund the streams and admitted he only uses those casinos because no one else does, that is scary considering they are not the best casinos.
I’ll repeat myself, fair play to him for answering. I’m guessing he hopes it will put the gossip mill to bed but I dont think it will bring about the positive reaction with those admissions.
1I’ll say this, fair play to chip, he came on and addressed the questions i asked him.
I might not agree with his reasoning but at least he engaged it so repect to him.
He did make a distinct point in his latest high stake video to say dont try and copy him so hopefully that’s a step in the right direction.
Chip has “ chipped “ in on a few threads here, I think by now he’s using biam as a yard stick of his popularity or wether he said something stupid and needs to address it in a future videos
.i personally don’t watch chip, he isn’t the kind of content created that I find engaging, which is fine, he’s not make videos for me… but as an outsider, I remember talks of chip on here being quite positive not really that long ago. I seem to recall him having a break( ?) and lots of “ top lad” comments, but something change in how he was perceived and because I don’t follow him I’m not quite sure what ( or if anything) happened…but like many have said above( from a revenue point of view,) he obviously has an idea that something isn’t right in how he’s been seen, and addressing that could draw him more viewers, so these responses are nothing but positives for him,( if sincere ) but ultimately it’s wether people believe The answer are legit, or wether the answer he gave are generic a)b)c) responses that you could have predicted…..
I actually think he answered enough to confirm most suspicions people have. It might have been vague but there was enough acknowledgment and conjecture there. Hes basically admitted to a video fee or something being used to fund the streams and admitted he only uses those casinos because no one else does, that is scary considering they are not the best casinos.
I’ll repeat myself, fair play to him for answering. I’m guessing he hopes it will put the gossip mill to bed but I dont think it will bring about the positive reaction with those admissions.
He stated on his stream today that he does not get a fee for each video. Don’t shoot the messenger ? Anyway, that’s what he said. And I’m never clicking on this thread again…. ??
Yeah, I know. The main point of the thread is your obsession with Chip. Anyway, doesn’t matter, its not important. What I’m having for lunch is way more important….
Have a good one. Hope you save us all from the tyrant called Chip.
Got no obsession with chip, if the thread was about Gabriel slots or about nick slots or about any of the Curacao site streamers or about bandit himself. I would have the same stance. My obsession is with responsible gambling. All I care about is that content creators are not exploiting vulnerable people or children. My main beef is with casinos who do this, but this is then extended to content creators who promote said sites.
1I’ll say this, fair play to chip, he came on and addressed the questions i asked him.
I might not agree with his reasoning but at least he engaged it so repect to him.
He did make a distinct point in his latest high stake video to say dont try and copy him so hopefully that’s a step in the right direction.
Chip has “ chipped “ in on a few threads here, I think by now he’s using biam as a yard stick of his popularity or wether he said something stupid and needs to address it in a future videos
.i personally don’t watch chip, he isn’t the kind of content created that I find engaging, which is fine, he’s not make videos for me… but as an outsider, I remember talks of chip on here being quite positive not really that long ago. I seem to recall him having a break( ?) and lots of “ top lad” comments, but something change in how he was perceived and because I don’t follow him I’m not quite sure what ( or if anything) happened…but like many have said above( from a revenue point of view,) he obviously has an idea that something isn’t right in how he’s been seen, and addressing that could draw him more viewers, so these responses are nothing but positives for him,( if sincere ) but ultimately it’s wether people believe The answer are legit, or wether the answer he gave are generic a)b)c) responses that you could have predicted…..
I actually think he answered enough to confirm most suspicions people have. It might have been vague but there was enough acknowledgment and conjecture there. Hes basically admitted to a video fee or something being used to fund the streams and admitted he only uses those casinos because no one else does, that is scary considering they are not the best casinos.
I’ll repeat myself, fair play to him for answering. I’m guessing he hopes it will put the gossip mill to bed but I dont think it will bring about the positive reaction with those admissions.
He stated on his stream today that he does not get a fee for each video. Don’t shoot the messenger
Anyway, that’s what he said. And I’m never clicking on this thread again…. Lol you’ll be back…
Ah I guess if he said on stream he doesnt a fee per video then he definitely doesn’t.
Nah to be fair thats why I said video fee or something else. If he used affiliation money im sure he would have said that not use it as a comparison for justification. If its not affiliation money then there is still some sort of set up/agreement in place. I think with a lot of things its just the lack of transparency, having any set up where his streams/videos are funded to take away any risk to him or minimise it detracts the authenticity of his videos. Then there’s the rabbit hole of responsible gambling by misrepresenting the funding of streams/videos.
The topic ‘Kickbacks for Affiliation’ is closed to new replies.