You or argyl said each spin is random and unconnected to any other spin. I 100% disagree and cannot fathom how anyone could even remotely believe otherwise.
It doesn’t really matter if you disagree, it is how it works. As I said last night, this element isn’t really even up for debate. This is on the same line as saying the Queen doesn’t exist. Well… she does. You can’t really have an opinion on that, it’s a fact that she exists.
What could be up for debate is whether you trust that an individual slot or provider is utilising a true random system, or is (illegally) compensating the game whilst still listing the statement ‘this machine is random’.
Again, truly 100% random means the players as a collective, over trillions of spins are making as much as the industry and every company collectively.
Again, no it doesn’t mean this. At all. 100% RTP would mean that, sure, that both the players and industry even out and no one profits nor loses in the long run.
But 100% RTP and 100% random are completely different things. There is a house edge, sure, and this is built into the paytable and the frequency of wins within the game’s programming. This is often around 96%, giving the house a 4% edge over the player(s) over a long period of time. But the outcome of each spin does not get modified, in any way whatsoever, to move closer to that 96% RTP. The RNG, used against a pre-set outcome combination dataset, does this for them. How? Again, I must revert back to the law of large numbers.
@argyl53 articulated this quite well by actually building a slot and showing us how it works:
Let’s look at a slot’s programming
They are random.
