-
Too many, my friend, too many
Thanks, I get the dice analogy, but even on this premise, it is the provider who is deciding what number is a win and which number is not. So they still control the random nature of the game.
If it was truly random to my mind, without any industry influence on the outcome then there would be the possibililty of a continual stream of wins for gamblers and casino’s going out of business.
The fact that they can run businesses, employ hundreds of staff, pay affiliate fees etc etc is clear evidence that this is not random by any stretch of the imagination, they know the games are not random and then can expect huge returns.
Don’t get me wrong, I understand the concept but still adhere to my principle that the random number generator is programmable and hence not random.
JB, after the last thread which got you a week’s ban for your absolutely vile language, I decided I no longer wanted to see your posts and actually have a browser extension I made which allows me to block people from the forum appearing on my screen. When you post, what I see now is this:
I’m going to go ahead and assume you’ve written the usual angry fluff of slots aren’t random, the outcomes are rigged, I’m a paid shill for the casino industry, it’s all a conspiracy etc.
Obviously I won’t be responding. The purpose of this post is just to do you the courtesy of letting you know that anything you direct at me won’t be read, acknowledged or replied to because I won’t see it.
JB, after the last thread which got you a week’s ban for your absolutely vile language, I decided I no longer wanted to see your posts and actually have a browser extension I made which allows me to block people from the forum appearing on my screen. When you post, what I see now is this:
I’m going to go ahead and assume you’ve written the usual angry fluff of slots aren’t random, the outcomes are rigged, I’m a paid shill for the casino industry, it’s all a conspiracy etc.
Obviously I won’t be responding. The purpose of this post is just to do you the courtesy of letting you know that anything you direct at me won’t be read, acknowledged or replied to because I won’t see it.
Lmao! You saddo. Youve obviously read what i wrote. Stop being passive aggressive mate. I honestly thought we were past all that.
Oooops sorry you cant read this can you?
Might aswell call you names then…
Ya silly sausage.
Random is two people getting exactly the same bonus sequence on jamming jars and it being widely reported. All I am ever saying is the slot industry is not 100% random and yes, every spin is connected, in some way by RTP. When a slot goes into suck mode, and then the bonus finally lands and you get back 1-3% rtp, random died and went to hell in favour of profit mode. When you hit a low symbol on DHV bonus and say the 9’s just refuse to land leaving the word “fix” being said, kills the random theory. I realise no one is denying pre-determined bonuses but that in it self is not random. No one is denying the use of random. At the end of the day, we all know this.
What I heard is that Jamming Jars is more like a virtual scratchcard than a slot, hence why you can get exactly the same bonus sequence as someone else. That’s fine; the winning or losing outcome – the “scratchcard” you get – is still random, it’s just done in a different way than many other slots work. Let’s get those dice rolls out again – if your total is exactly 11, you get a pre-determined bonus sequence which results in you winning 10 x your stake. The outcome of that dice roll is still completely random.
Yawn….Oi argyl can u see this?
@argyl53 we’re wasting our time with Just Basics and Mr B. They do not have the mental capacity to comprehend or take in what we’re saying here. I honestly wouldn’t waste your energy any more with them.
Yes, that may seem like an awfully rude thing to say, but if you go back through my posts you’ll see how often I (and others) have articulated several points on this topic to Mr B just this week, politely, and here he is back again making comments that just tell me either 1) he hasn’t bothered to read them or 2) he doesn’t understand or 3) he’s just too stubborn to admit that he’s wrong. To me, that’s rude.
I agree there is a learning curve here with this topic, and it’s a good one to debate. But when it’s exactly the same points being raised and refuted time and time again, it’s clear there is no point continuing this debate with certain people.
How do they reduce the rtp mate ?
The topic ‘Let’s look at a slot’s programming’ is closed to new replies.