Forum Forum Home Bandit’s Posts Today’s Posts

[EnglishGuy WANTED $99 Outlaw]

Roshtein is Legit.

Also..

I am actually President Trump.. just had a nibble with the queen, now catching up on my fav forum.

 

no really.. honestly…

 

 

[sp springbrucesteen WANTED $77 Outlaw]

Wow great thread

now in Harry hill mode , are online slots really random or a controlled random ? there’s only one way to find out

FIGHT !!!!

[awesomex WANTED $136 Outlaw]

Cus slots can’t be manipulated:

That’s why casinos have to contact the provider to verify huge wins, cus the slots can’t be manipulated. Right?

[awesomex WANTED $136 Outlaw]

By the way, the lack of true randomness is not there for the player, it’s there as a safeguard to the casino, so a slot doesn’t end up with a negative RTP of 5000%. On certain casinos you can see how novomatic slots have behaved, and you will never see them in a huge deficit.

[TheReelStory WANTED $14 Outlaw]

awesomex wrote:

Cus slots can’t be manipulated: <iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/DgbufJ_yYI0?feature=oembed&#8221; width=”640″ height=”480″ frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>
That’s why casinos have to contact the provider to verify huge wins, cus the slots can’t be manipulated. Right?

I’m confused what your video is supposed to be showing?

But no, when in real play on a live site, slots cannot be manipulated. Big wins are sometimes sent for verification because, believe it or not, slot providers do make mistakes, and you will note in all the T&C’s and help files it will say ‘Technical Malfunction voids all pays’. Casino’s like to check there was not a technical malfunction before paying out big wins.

Bugs in software are a fact of life. They are rare and they are not manipulation. They are mistakes (often in the players favour) that need to be corrected.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

awesomex wrote:

That’s why casinos have to contact the provider to verify huge wins, cus the slots can’t be manipulated. Right?

1. This isn’t even a real win, it’s demo mode.

2. You cannot play this game at £600 per spin in real mode. As I and several others have previously stated, casinos are protected by stake limits on the games and max payouts in their terms and conditions.

3. The feature win is 226x, hardly outlandish, I’ve hit wins around 10 times that in real play on Greentube games and some NetEnt games like DoA have paid out over 30,000x in real play. This one just looks huge because of the phony 600 unit stake.

4. Casinos contact the provider in the event of very rare, enormous wins just for confirmation the game result was not a technical error or software malfunction before they pay out. This is entirely right and normal; on what basis in your mind is this check evidence slots can be manipulated?

5. You do not have an IQ anywhere remotely approaching the 180 mark. I don’t even need to know you to be able to tell that with the utmost confidence purely off your post history. What’s hilarious about your claim is that the Mensa IQ test doesn’t even go above 162 on scoring, that’s the highest anyone can get.

[TheReelStory WANTED $14 Outlaw]

awesomex wrote:

By the way, the lack of true randomness is not there for the player, it’s there as a safeguard to the casino, so a slot doesn’t end up with a negative RTP of 5000%. On certain casinos you can see how novomatic slots have behaved, and you will never see them in a huge deficit.

I’ve already explained how randomness has nothing to do with this. The casino’s protect themselves by using Max Win Caps and Max Stake limits. Beyond this, the mathematical model of the slot itself ensures profitability.

So please explain to me exactly HOW the ‘lack of randomness’ is used to safeguard the Casino? What control does it give them? exactly how is it implemented in order to do this? Explain the exact mechanic to me.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

awesomex wrote:

By the way, the lack of true randomness is not there for the player, it’s there as a safeguard to the casino, so a slot doesn’t end up with a negative RTP of 5000%. On certain casinos you can see how novomatic slots have behaved, and you will never see them in a huge deficit.

Please stop posting things when you have no idea what you’re talking about. This is the equivalent of a bricklayer telling a surgeon you can repair a brain aneurysm by amputating a foot.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Imagine having an IQ of 180 and still being as thick as mince? Doesn’t make much sense. You don’t even know what fraud is, as you proved in the past. But you’re a super-genius clearly… ????????

[awesomex WANTED $136 Outlaw]

Almost all of you are actually sitting in front of your computers, defending one of the most corrupt industries in the world. That says a lot

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Rbreen91 wrote:

Imagine having an IQ of 180 and still being as thick as mince? Doesn’t make much sense. You don’t even know what fraud is, as you proved in the past. But you’re a super-genius clearly… ????????

Stephen Hawking had an IQ score of 160 and although IQ is not quite a reliable measure overall intelligence, the difference in cognitive ability between a score of 160 and 180 is huge when it comes to statistics – I mean, 160 puts you in the top 0.1% of the world’s population, whereas 180 puts you somewhere around the 12th highest score ever recorded. I just don’t know how someone can come on a forum, lose an argument and then go “yeah well I’ve got an IQ over 180 and I’m in Mensa so there”, it’s like something a fourteen year old would do, it just shows a total lack of self-respect and dignity I think.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

What colour is your Mensa card?

[awesomex WANTED $136 Outlaw]

argyl53 wrote:

Rbreen91 wrote:

Imagine having an IQ of 180 and still being as thick as mince? Doesn’t make much sense. You don’t even know what fraud is, as you proved in the past. But you’re a super-genius clearly… ????????

Stephen Hawking had an IQ score of 160 and although IQ is not quite a reliable measure overall intelligence, the difference in cognitive ability between a score of 160 and 180 is huge when it comes to statistics – I mean, 160 puts you in the top 0.1% of the world’s population, whereas 180 puts you somewhere around the 12th highest score ever recorded. I just don’t know how someone can come on a forum, lose an argument and then go “yeah well I’ve got an IQ over 180 and I’m in Mensa so there”, it’s like something a fourteen year old would do, it just shows a total lack of self-respect and dignity I think.

1 in 3.5 million people have an IQ of 180 or more.
If you believe it or not doesn’t matter to me, as the people around me in my everyday life know it.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Imagine actually coming into the internet to lie about your IQ when you’ve just been rinsed about knowing absolutely fuck all about how slots work.

[sl slottinggooner WANTED $23 Outlaw]

This reply has been reported for inappropriate content.

Awesomex might be a mathematical genius but he/she doesn’t acknowledge data protection/gpdr laws when sharing information on a forum.

[Author]

Posts