Slightly tilted on Riders of the Storm

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #79851
    CasinoMasta WANTED $1
    Outlaw

    I’m normally the silent reader, but im massively tilted by Thunderkicks New Game Riders of the Storm and need to get it off my chest. Just lost 150 € in 3 deposits at 0.2 and 0.5 Stake without a single bonus. So many teases on this ducking peace of sheet.

    Maybe Bandit can get a Bonus for me in his next vid. Just want to see what the bonus is..

     

    Thx for reading, feels a bit better to share -.-

    #79859
    Winningbird WANTED $574
    Outlaw

    I played it on free play. It’s not that good ? it has walking wilds on each spin with multipliers. I didn’t think it was worth all the spins I did to be honest 🙂

    #79860
    CasinoMasta WANTED $1
    Outlaw

    Aha so it’s a little bit like Jack an the Beanstalk without the bonus.. great to hear what I missed. Fml

    #79878
    eejit101 WANTED $312
    Outlaw

    Walking wilds with 2x 3x or 5x though. Stacked premiums. Can go a bit mad….

     

    Its not that bad

    #79886
    Winningbird WANTED $574
    Outlaw

    I don’t mind it, I just don’t think it’s worth the amount of spins it takes to get a bonus, especially for a thunderkick. If it was a btg I would understand, but surely it’s not as volatile as a slot like danger?

    #79889
    Green2711 WANTED $492
    Outlaw

    Winningbird wrote:

    I don’t mind it, I just don’t think it’s worth the amount of spins it takes to get a bonus, especially for a thunderkick. If it was a btg I would understand, but surely it’s not as volatile as a slot like danger?

    Id imagine it would be if you get 3+ walking wilds with x3/5 and hit a premium then it could pay big maybe not as much as a Btg slot like Donuts or Danger but those games are often all or nothing this seems like it would pay more consistently in the bonus with walking wilds. The chances of it happening would be slim though just like on most BTG games.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)