Video slots

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 145 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #83399
    Haz40 WANTED $1,167
    Outlaw

    ?????? what an absolute fruitbat. Omg there’s some strange people in the world especially on the internet.

    #83400
    PsychicSnail WANTED $111
    Outlaw

    @trr420. I’d be happier if you got yourself banned as I win £1 from Haz :). So take your ridiculous ideas and shove ’em matey. I’ve never known anyone spout so much shite as you do in my life. Obviously someone with a low intellect and big gob 🙂

    p.s. Sweating that £1 now Haz? 🙂

    #83401
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    Argyl. You did edit your post on this thread to correct a wrong that i was pointing out until you posted a new comment and i had to change what i was writing.

    I’m curious to know what post you think I edited and to what end, because I’ll say it again as clearly as I possibly can: it didn’t happen.

    Why do you seem overly obsessed with it?

    I’m not the one who’s obsessing over someone else expressing a trivial opinion. I’m merely correcting you for the benefit of other readers when you wrongly claim I’ve called for VideoSlots to be boycotted, refused to take responsibility for my own gambling, edited my posts to make you look wrong and all the other fiction you’ve made up in your head and then ascribed to me. You say you’ve proved me wrong; I don’t even have any idea what it is you think you’ve proved me wrong about. All I’ve done here is state a personal opinion about a casino’s handling of something.

    #83402
    Biohazard WANTED $675
    Outlaw

    trr420 wrote:

    You’re all faggots and unhappy with your life.
    #83409
    eejit101 WANTED $312
    Outlaw

    You should always link your quotes 😉

     

    Personality Disorders Often Seen in People With Gambling Addiction

    #83412
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    Why link my quotes? It was the first one i could see when i tried to prove my point. People that have gambling addictions are usually people with a personality disorder. I know a lot about mental health issues. I know at least 50% of personality disorders are un-diagnosed. I also knew that the link between depression and personality disorders in people with gambling addictions was very common. So i told people trying to label me unwell that had to go on gamstop they were deflecting their issues onto me. I was right and the link you provided along with others will explain this. It is common knowledge that an ex addict isn’t helping himself OR OTHERS HE OFFERS TERRIBLE ADVICE TO, EVEN THOUGH HE CAN’T HELP HIMSELF.. by continuing to be involved in his past addiction somehow and clings onto shit as a means of getting, in his own terrible words, A FIX TO STOP HIM GAMBLING. Isn’t that what the charity funded gamstop did for him? Stopped him gambling??? Now time to help yourselves and stop deflecting your personal issues onto others as a means of coping.

    #83413
    eejit101 WANTED $312
    Outlaw

    Ok, lets try this a new way, just for me.

    We all have issues with RTP being lowered on Videoslots. I mean, noone prefer to play on lower RTP. This is a fact.

    So lets leave this to one side.

    So – just, please in simple form, answer me two questions that ill ask and debate openly with no retribution or hatred.

    1 – Why is reported them for this wrong? Why is it, simply remember, that stopping sites doing questionable things is not a good thing?

    2 – Why the arguament with Argyl on this. He cant edit posts. Seedy could see this and check it. What is the underlying issue here?

    #83417
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    1. Reporting them is not what is wrong. It is the reason you reported them that is wrong.
    2. He edited a post i wanted to reply to and then i had to change what i was writing. That was all and not a big deal as i can respond to any remark he makes. No issue there.

    1. You made a complaint because they didn’t advertise the change of RTP. Then when told they did, you say their advertising doesn’t meet you requirements. You make the case an email is better suited, yet it could end up in junk or you might not use it any more as you use a different email address. You wrote to licencing bodies and state they did wrong when in time you will be proven wrong. That is coming to you soon, should you continue with the complaint.
    The Rtp isn’t guaranteed and you are not under a contract and you are free to play elsewhere. So why try and complain knowing fine well why they reduced the RTP?
    Lastly… if they did it and others follow, are you going to write to the licencing bodies of all the Casinos that are forced into taking games they don’t want to have… otherwise they would have had them from the start.?

    #83418
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    Did you complain to the UK gambling commission or Maltese? What makes you think white label don’t need to listen to the rules that the UK gambling commission just make up? It is something you said in “has the streaming bubble burst thread”.

    #83420
    eejit101 WANTED $312
    Outlaw

    Ok, now we can discuss properly. simplicity rules.

    Argyl ill leave to you guys, i have no input but I didnt see it so I cant comment. However he doesnt ever lie on here, so far, so i dont see why he would have edited anything unless he made a mistake in typing? Ill leave this to him.

     

    Now for VS – I reported it for 2 reasons.

    1 – Lowering RTP on games without proper informing of players.

    2 – Lowering RTP on games on several providers under multiple licences witout informing all licences correctly.

     

    It is my belief, and i say again, mine, that this is wrong. Morally for sure. Legally I have no idea. I cant see any regulation about it that fully covers it. So my goal here is not to get them banned from whatever jurisdiction. Shit they could kill someone and probably not get banned. Look at the fines for Leovegas and Casumo recently, they wont ever get banned, just huge huge fines. My goal was – to get the regulation changed to promote full disclosure from casinos of things like this. As lets flip side it for a second. If they can swap the games to 94% its possible to swap them back right? Its a simple change of integrations of the games. As they have them integrated, they just activate certain end points and job is done. Whats to stop them going to 88% games for 2 hours then swapping back? Nothing. Would you say that was wrong? I know for a fact a company released an 86% RTP slot. What if a major provider builds this version, has it signed off by GLI, then releases it to VS. They swap it over for 30mins at 7pm GMT. The money there make there doing that daily is rather large. What if then all caisnos do this?  I want the regulation to show that changes to RTP on games already played on a site must be given to players in the form of a window popup when the game opens, in that the game is different. Thats all I want.

     

    As for your white label thing.. i dont follow. You know Rizk is a white label casino right? Just as im confused if you realise what it means. (I didnt when i started working here, took me a few weeks to learn the huge aspects behind gaming that you dont see when playing)

    #83424
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    He edited a post i wanted to reply to and then i had to change what i was writing.

    Which post? There’s only one in this thread I edited in the few minutes after posting it’s possible to do so and it’s not one you’ve replied to.

    #83425
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    It is my belief, and i say again, mine, that this is wrong.
    Fair enough, that doesn’t mean they are when all the evidence, including the fact you can’t prove it, isn’t available to prove it. If we are talking about a moral objective, that’s another issue. That could be easily sorted through them and you and maybe, just maybe, they would listen. When you go elsewhere to raise an issue that can lead to fines when they are already a struggling site( all be it the biggest slot provider in the uk site) then you risk them going elsewhere or being fined out of the uk market. WHITE LABEL CASINOS WOULD BE FINED OUT OF THE MARKET BY NOT LISTENING TO THE UK GAMBLING COMMISSION. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YET?

    So my goal here is not to get them banned from whatever jurisdiction. Shit they could kill someone and probably not get banned.
    They were forced to do it. Or leave the UK. So whether they get banned or not, any fines if they were due them which they aren’t, would drive them out of the UK market. So it is the same result.

    If they can swap the games to 94% its possible to swap them back right?
    No. You said last night or the day before you understood they had to do it because of TAX and costs of being in the UK. Your issue is with the UK Government, take it to them if you dare.

    Whats to stop them going to 88% games for 2 hours then swapping back. That would be illegal and there would not be any reason to do it.

    You started to waffle near the end eejit and sound very paranoid for somebody that understands the reason they had to reduce the RTP only slightly. Keep an eye on their news page or check the RTP before you play. It’s not a lot to ask , considering that is meant to be your responsibility at all times regardless.
    Years ago they didn’t have to show the RTP. Now they do, make use of that fact and stop pushing blame elsewhere. It is literally there any time you need it for a reason, yet that reason isn’t good enough for you.

    You said that the Casino you work for don’t have to listen to any rules the UK Gambling Commission make up. You are wrong if they want a UK licence. I don’t use Riskz. I am sure there are a couple of decent ones… they are just hard to find.

    #83426
    eejit101 WANTED $312
    Outlaw

    trr420 wrote:

    It is my belief, and i say again, mine, that this is wrong. Fair enough, that doesn’t mean they are when all the evidence, including the fact you can’t prove it, isn’t available to prove it. If we are talking about a moral objective, that’s another issue. That could be easily sorted through them and you and maybe, just maybe, they would listen. When you go elsewhere to raise an issue that can lead to fines when they are already a struggling site( all be it the biggest slot provider in the uk site) then you risk them going elsewhere or being fined out of the uk market. WHITE LABEL CASINOS WOULD BE FINED OUT OF THE MARKET BY NOT LISTENING TO THE UK GAMBLING COMMISSION. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YET?

    So my goal here is not to get them banned from whatever jurisdiction. Shit they could kill someone and probably not get banned.
    They were forced to do it. Or leave the UK. So whether they get banned or not, any fines if they were due them which they aren’t, would drive them out of the UK market. So it is the same result.

    If they can swap the games to 94% its possible to swap them back right?
    No. You said last night or the day before you understood they had to do it because of TAX and costs of being in the UK. Your issue is with the UK Government, take it to them if you dare.

    Whats to stop them going to 88% games for 2 hours then swapping back. That would be illegal and there would not be any reason to do it.

    You started to waffle near the end eejit and sound very paranoid for somebody that understands the reason they had to reduce the RTP only slightly. Keep an eye on their news page or check the RTP before you play. It’s not a lot to ask , considering that is meant to be your responsibility at all times regardless.
    Years ago they didn’t have to show the RTP. Now they do, make use of that fact and stop pushing blame elsewhere. It is literally there any time you need it for a reason, yet that reason isn’t good enough for you.

    You said that the Casino you work for don’t have to listen to any rules the UK Gambling Commission make up. You are wrong if they want a UK licence. I don’t use Riskz. I am sure there are a couple of decent ones… they are just hard to find.

     

    You missed 2 points hugely here.

     

    It is very much possible to change a game from 94% to 88%. That was rhetorical. Im saying its 100% possible. Wasnt a debate.

     

    And once more, this isnt at VS. This is at all casinos. Just takes one to screw everyone over like this and it all tumbles down a bit. Not saying VS would. But VS did change multiple jurisdictions here. Thats the issue. Not just UK. I cant say this enough

    #83427
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    Argyl53. Why is that taking over everything? What’s the issue. When i write a reply you don’t reply to, then all i seemed to get is a diversion. Reguardless. There was the same people here as there was on the other thread “has the streaming bubble burst” coming and changing the subject on me. If you read through you will see when i tried to end the other stream by coming here and explaining my intention was not for it to end up with multiple people attacking eachother and name calling in the Bandits house, you came straight in to tell me here i was wrong and you were right. You lead me to assume you gambled, as you are here. You made me assume you didn’t like video slots as you were calling for people to boycott them lol. Then have the cheek to tell me i am making shit up when it is reasonable to assume what i said.

    #83428
    eejit101 WANTED $312
    Outlaw

    Also your changing what ive said several times. I never said we dont have to listen to the UK. I said we arent int he market. I dont understand why you change what im saying and the context of it so much.

     

    As for your arguament of “Check the RTP each time you play” thats insane. Noone does that. Just like you dont check the ingredients on your mars bar each time you buy it. but i guarantee if it changes the chocolate level down to 1% youll complain, even if it does say in tiny print on the back

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 145 total)