argyl53

Forum Menu

Forum Info

  • Town Status : Outlaw
  • Wanted Reward: $419
  • Topics Started : 48
  • Replies Created : 965

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 969 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What happened to just basics? #76772
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    The real question though is what happened to awesomex? Yeah he described himself as wealthy, hard and one of the smartest people ever to have lived but at least he was modest about it ?

    1
    in reply to: What happened to just basics? #76770
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    Rbreen91 wrote:

    Mr B is a forum legend. Never had any idea what the fucker was on about right enough…

    I hear he now runs his own forum where he does nothing but break his own rules then post threads calling himself out on it, then explaining to himself that he’d like to explain why he broke his forum rules but it would break his forum rules for him to do so.

    4
    in reply to: What happened to just basics? #76724
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    Making up pretend personas for a gambling forum is probably not a sign of someone in an emotionally healthy place. Hope he sorts out whatever he’s got going on.

    in reply to: What happened to just basics? #76662
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    He started interesting conversations, I’ll give him that. Didn’t see the one that apparently kicked it all off with this other TGC person, but I did think last couple of months in particular he’d seemed a little more excitable or wound up here even for him.

    in reply to: Is YT over saturated? #76645
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    I would say yes. It’s crazy how many people now are trying to jump on the affiliation bandwagon and the equally weird, no-name fly by night casinos they affiliate with. When it’s reached the point you’ve got Gary Johnson Slots with 214 subscribers pushing affiliate links, I think oversaturation is very much the word.

    in reply to: A block option? #76494
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    The only problem with my Chrome plugin is it can’t automatically detect and block JB’s multiple accounts and personas. Perhaps I should talk to one of the casinos, see if I can borrow some of that sophisticated AI….

    1
    1
    in reply to: A block option? #76214
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    Ah, yeah it’s a Chrome plugin called Banditsnatch which allows you to block posters by username. Basically just a bit of JavaScript that runs on each page load and removes the blocked users content before you see it.

    in reply to: Monopoly Live #75773
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    We’re not seeing evidence which suggests any game manipulation / rigging here, just human error in registering the result. The scandal and disgraceful conduct is their apparent acting like it just didn’t happen rather than committing to proper restitution for the players affected. That’s absolutely indefensible in my view, if that happened to me I’d never play anything from that provider again. While I would absolutely not jump to far fetched conclusions like “omg it’s rigged and they choose what they want it to land on in advance”, particularly bearing in mind Evolution don’t even know what bets have been placed when they spin the wheel, I would definitely say this warrants a full statement by Evolution explaining what happened and additional checks on the game by the Gambling Commission. If those things don’t happen, no one should play the game.

    in reply to: Monopoly Live #75741
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    I don’t even think those suggestions would be sufficient. I never played these Dreamcatcher types of game but I did play roulette sometimes and I know if I’d bet a load on say 17 and it clearly, unequivocally landed on it, but they mistakenly registered it as some other number, I’d be demanding my winnings. Wouldn’t be enough to go “oh our mistake, have your bet back” – no, screw that, I want the 36x my bet I won. I’d never be given a refund for claiming I mistakenly bet on a losing spin. What Evolution should do in this case at the very least is arrange with the casinos who took bets on that round to pay the players the average result of a 4 roll bonus. To just ignore it is nothing short of scandalous. I’ve never seen anything like that happen on any live casino game before.

    1
    in reply to: Grosvenor new game release – DO NOT PLAY!!! #75739
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    Problems with the online version aside, out of interest how is this game different to regular Book of Ra?

    in reply to: Rainbow riches megaways flaw #75737
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    Reminds me of the time a casino glitched on live roulette, didn’t credit my win which prevented me repeating the bet. Lost £144 of my money for 7 days, of course the next 3 spins I couldn’t take part in would have netted me a further £600 if I’d been able to repeat and by way of compensation I was given 20 free spins worth 10p each on Starburst which paid about 30p total.

    in reply to: Far too many coincidences now. #75583
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    Just Basics wrote:

    argyl53 wrote:

    What game are you talking about? If it’s Monopoly Live, I don’t know enough about it to comment, which is why I haven’t contributed to Bio’s thread about it. If it’s a slot, however….

    Slot…..wheel….box who cares what it is. They’ve been caught in live play being dodgy af. The way they fumble around in the videos trying to act innocent is funny as fuck.

    I know your the go to slot guy, and only post “facts” but atleast have an opinion on this for gods sake.

     

    No. How can I have an opinion on it when I don’t know exactly how it works or what regulatory and testing oversight it’s been subjected to? It’s a fool who has opinions on things they don’t know anything about.

    in reply to: Far too many coincidences now. #75519
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    What game are you talking about? If it’s Monopoly Live, I don’t know enough about it to comment, which is why I haven’t contributed to Bio’s thread about it. If it’s a slot, however….

    in reply to: Rainbow riches megaways flaw #75421
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    They’re so eager to churn out new megaways titles now they’re not being tested or even finished properly. I mean, Rainbow Riches and Raging Rhino megaways…am I the only one who thinks they actually look like early prototypes rather than market ready games? They remind me of some kid’s college project or something. They don’t have nearly the polish and finish I’d expect from a reputable brand.

    2
    in reply to: Streamers lowering the.rtp #74754
    argyl53 WANTED $419
    Outlaw

    Some FOBT games are now also compensated following the stake cap introduced in April. Since they got rid of £20-50 mega spins, many games have brought in a mode where you pay £2 a spin for the chance to win mega spins instead. I saw on one of Stop and Step’s videos for example when he went in to Centurion’s new fortune spins gamble, the game stated this feature is compensated, whereas the regular £2 base game remains random. So one to look out for if you play in bookies.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 969 total)