Forum

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I’ve had big wins at all stake levels I’ve played at. Loads of people hit huge wins on all stake levels. There was a member of this forum a few months back who hit a Book of Ra Magic bonus on £20 stake and won £54,000. The only reason it seems to us as players we hit more decent features on low stakes is because the vast majority make most of our spins on low stakes, because that’s what we can afford. If you had enough bankroll to play thousands of spins on all the different slots at £5, £10 or £20 a pop, you’d be hitting crazy money too – you’d just also be losing it at the same rate.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I think my personal best is the 2000x on Book of Ra, full screen of second highest symbol. Was 80p stake so £1600 win, though I suppose as the whole bonus counts as one win, technically it was more like 2060x.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Yeah the problem with double feature regardless of which two it gives you is you only get 6 spins. So unless you get some major wild help from either colossal or random, it’s not very likely to be monstrous. And the big colossal can easily not show up in 6 spins.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I think people just need to know their games and be aware when they play these high volatility, random feature games that much as they can go mental and pay wins hundreds or thousands of times the stake, they are more likely to give a mediocre bonus and on occasion a zero one. There are dozens of games you can play where a bonus is guaranteed to be a win but as a player be realistic; you’re not going to get a game where the bonus is frequent, guaranteed at least okay money and has epic potential. In any slot you will get at best two of those things, maybe only one.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I played this game a lot a couple of years ago and have had numerous double features. They all have pretty good potential, but I think my best win was off colossal wild and multiplier, when it landed the beige coloured duck symbol all over reels 1 and 5 and plonked the massive 3×3 wild in the middle. Pretty sure that was bigger than a full wild screen on colossal + random, which I’ve also had. Also had some shit ones; multiplier and random wild paying about 10x total, symbol removal and multiplier also about the same. I would say those are the worst two to get. symbol removal + random and symbol removal + colossal can go either good or bad.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

What is 21+3 as a bet, what does that mean?

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I was very much like this as a gambler; wouldn’t spend £7 on a decent steak for my dinner because I’d think that was crazy expensive for one meal, but would cheerfully piss away enough to enjoy a steak dinner with wine for every day for a month in a single night online.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Interesting. Lorem ipsum text is something we often use in web design and media publishing as placeholder text where real content for testing or where we need to represent real content which hasn’t been written yet. It looks like Latin, but it isn’t, it’s just nonsense which has a spread of letters similar to those found in the English language, so it gives a good visual of what a block of English would look like in place.

Strange that you got it as a private message, possible they were testing something about the message system and accidentally sent some live messages which were meant to be dummy runs.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I’ve seen a lot of spins from the same roulette game on the same casino which don’t look dodgy at all.

I also know the compiled collection of dodgy looking spins in JB’s video can and do on occasion happen for entirely natural reasons on fair roulette wheels, especially ones with shallow divots which are prone to allowing the ball to slide around more than the type of wheel used by e.g. immersive roulette. Of course it looks super dodgy if you compile a video showing only those spins and none of the hundreds of normal looking spins in any given session.

Finally, I don’t believe for a second any casino looking to unfairly rig its roulette game would do so in any manner which would be so ham fisted and obvious to the player. The last thing any dodgy casino would want is for any cheating to be visible to the Gambling Commission.

Now all that said, can I tell you conclusively with 100% certainty there’s no magnets or other untoward thing happening on that particular roulette game? No, of course I can’t. I just equally stand by no one including JB can be conclusively sure it is dodgy either.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

 

dont know enough about Artificial Intelligence to be swayed either way on your points Liberty.

All I do know is that it’s far beyond our reach now, and it’s too late to cut it off.

This thread has been great

I’d like to close it now, and say Thankyou to the participants.

i know I say things that have zero substance to them sometimes. And I’m also fully aware that I can just see what I want to see.

I’ll credit for actually admitting this. But why not learn about how these things work, instead of emotively sticking to your preconceptions? It’s not beyond your ability to understand the mechanics of how slots work, for example, and I have explained it lots of different ways in other threads.

Slots, roulette, blackjack…they are rigged, but they’re rigged transparently, by design. Roulette for example is rigged by paying you 35:1 when your odds of winning are 36:1. This guarantees the casino a long term profit. Slots similarly have a built-in margin through the reel layout and pay table.

 

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

But, a generator is still a program. An AI robot with advanced machine learning capabilities will be able to figure out the pattern in the algorithm. Let’s take a look at a fictitious example:

An AI is being taught to play the slots. The sole nature of the slots with its many winning combinations, depending on the number of lines and symbols in the game. Leave the AI playing the slots for some time, and it will be able to figure out when the winning combination will occur – at the first, fourth, or twelfth spin.

This entire post is complete nonsense and incorrect in every way. Please refer to my dozens of other posts and threads on how slots and RNGs actually work.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Just Basics wrote:

Ok this is getting confusing. I don’t know if it’s because of my retarded inward thinking again. Or it’s because I have 3 guys trying to blag my head.

Lets start again. Brb

Let’s not. There’s no point to any of it if you ask a question, I answer it in good faith and all you post back is haha lol old man ww1 stories. Surely, you’re either a troll who gets a kick out of being controversial to get a reaction, or you genuinely struggle with English comprehension. I suspect it might be a bit of both. Either way, no point me trying to talk to you about anything.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Just Basics wrote:

Wow just….wow! All I wanted was a simple yes or no. But we seemed to get into long winded when I was in WW1 story’s again!

Ok forget what I said and now implement Artificial Intelligence into every casino game that ever was.

Do I have to give evidence and examples on how A.I actually works?

It is far superior in every single way to us. It is also unpredictable and adaptive. But it’s even more unpredictable and adaptive than we are. It outshines us in every department apart from our morals and humanity.

I simply can’t have this conversation with you 3, because you never acknowledge that things can be hidden beyond your beliefs.

 

You haven’t actually said anything anyone can respond to. It’s a shame; naively, I thought just once you might have some valid contribution or interesting discussion to raise.

What are you hoping for when I answer your questions and what I get back is “ere mate, what ya doin usin them fancy words an shit?”

Impossible to have an intelligible conversation with you, let alone an intelligent one.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I don’t think I’d call what JB is describing in the rock-paper-scissors thing cheating; as Liberty says, it’s more analogous to keeping track of a poker player’s history play style. If you’re really clever, you can do that to give yourself a little bit of an edge that might help you make a more informed judgement about how to bet against them, how likely they are to be bluffing, etc. That’s certainly strategic, but it isn’t cheating, it’s actually the difference between being a poker player and a good poker player.

And just like with poker, so it’s the same with JB’s example: sometimes, for all the strategy in the data in the world, you’ll still make a wrong call because humans are fundamentally unpredictable and adaptive.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I direct the above question to Argyl also.

I’m not sure about the context of the question you’re asking. Say we’ve played rock-paper-scissors a thousand times before and you’ve kept track of a full history of those results and have it immediately available in your head, in a split second while you make your decision about which one to pick in the next round of play. Is that what you’re describing?

If so, I would say it may give you a very slight odds advantage, but humans are actual Turing machines – that is, we are capable of true unpredictable, true random, non-determinate output to any given input. We are simply not formulaic or algorithmic such as our choice in rock paper scissors to be necessarily predictable. You could use previous data to more finely adjust your odds if you were trying to quickly calculate what I might be likely to pick, but you’d never be able to rely on it to know what I’ll pick in advance of me doing it.

I don’t know if this is answering your question because I’m not 100% on what you’re asking or looking for by way of reply.

[Author]

Posts