Forum

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

You’re out of disk space, my good man.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Bonanza is so good for wagering I encountered at least one casino (I think it was Mr Green) that wouldn’t actually let you stake bonus funds on it. 100 spins on Bonanza is likely to cost you somewhere between 0 and 40 spins worth of balance.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

It has also been thrown back at me that i am rubbing peoples faces in it

Yeah, rubbing people’s faces in the money you give away to them out the goodness of your heart 😀

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

We don’t need to theorise on these things because the rules laid down by the regulator are available for anyone to read. The only “prize pool” accumulation allowed in an online slot is a progressive jackpot.

Game results must be ‘acceptably random’. Acceptably random here means that it is possible to demonstrate to a high degree of confidence that the output of the RNG, game, lottery and virtual event outcomes are random through, for example, statistical
analysis using generally accepted tests and methods of analysis. Adaptive behaviour (ie a compensated game) is not permitted.

Game designs or features that may reasonably be expected to mislead the customer about the likelihood of particular results occurring are not permitted

Where the event requires a pre-determined layout (for example, hidden prizes on a map), the locations of the winning spots should not change during play, except as provided for in the rules of the game.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Some games have seen a change in play with the release of new versions. Some of the Novos and NetEnts are good examples. Secret of the Stones for example got a new version somewhere around six months ago and doesn’t bonus nearly as frequently anymore. When I was playing, I did well off slots; I was a low staker but I turned a profit most sessions because I knew what I was doing and played to a particular strategy. You can still win, but you have to play smart. Chasing a bonus for 1000 spins is usually not playing smart.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Oh hell yes and it gets released on the day I get paid! 🙂 also told my gf to not expect me to be available for the following week. Best computer game of all time, reimagined in fully immersive 3D. It’s going to be epic.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

For heaven’s sake, no the wild x6 is exactly what it looks like – it counts as 6 ways of wild on the reel it appears on. Two adjacent active wild x6s counts as 36 ways of any connecting win up to and including the wild reels. There is no ambiguity about this.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

According to the paytable, it should definitely be £108 for that stake. As far as the table goes, for ball ball x6 x6 to pay £36, you’d have to be on an impossible £1.66 stake. I do note however on £5 stake, 9 or 10 on the first two reels followed by a x6 x6 would pay £36 exactly.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Well we can be sure it’s more than £36 just off the fact that in your video today, a single x6 way win of King to fourth reel pays £12 so there’s no way 36 ways of a higher symbol also to the fourth reel only pays £1 per way. Either something’s gone very wrong or you saw it wrong and it was some other symbol that got the multiplying wilds. Were both x6s definitely lit up electric? I know it sometimes comes in deactivated where nothing hits it. It’s not that I doubt your word for a second, it just seems extraordinary that the game would randomly pay you incorrectly once.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Was the win 1 ball 1 ball x6 x6 to the fourth reel? If so on £5 stake by my reckoning it should return £108. Do you have the footage of that? I struggle to believe there’s a glitch of that magnitude in the game, any chance you misread the win or were on a lower stake?

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

what I have learnt is the 6x wild is just a standard wild that times the whole spin by 6

That’s right, or another way of looking at the same payout is that it counts as 6 individual wilds on the same reel. But I thought someone else was suggesting it merely multiplies the wins to its left by 6, which is not the same thing. A spin where the first 3 reels show 1 Skull, 1 Skull, wild counts as 3 skull symbols 1 way. 1 Skull, 1 Skull, wildX6 counts as 6 lines/ways of 3 skulls, not 6 ways of 2.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

The Bandit wrote:

Over my head mate tbh

The forum software may possibly overlook filtering usernames which are web addresses when it converts them to links and puts them in the page, which opens up a few hacking vectors. Get your guy to check it out, it might be getting filtered and be fine but it’s one of those things you see on a website which smells like a potential vulnerability.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

The Gnome – you got a security flaw in the site there, @thebandit? The URL as a username is automatically converted to a link, hello potential for cross site scripting and clickjack injections!

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

The first 3 reels are discoball, discoball and x6 so the win is £6.

The 4th reel multiplied the win x6 and so paid £36.

This is not correct. The x6 on DHV is Wild x6, it counts as 6 ways of wild symbols on the reel it lands on. So for example 1 Skull on first reel followed by x6 x6 is 36 ways of 3 skulls.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

saint900 wrote:

Im from germany and have been jealously (maybe spelled wrong) watching this thread. Not because of the winnings. The winnings are dope AF, but i cant play reel king. For some reason you cant play any merkur or novomatics slots in germany. Dont know if reel king is from this provider but i tried to play it on 3 different casinos and i am not allowed too.

 

Would someone play reel king for me ? on 60p with 100 starting ? xD i just want to see if it tops. We can split the winnings. I give you the money in advance. I dont know xD…. its fucked up. but i want to play this game so bad….

Interesting, I thought Greentube were actually a German company.

[Author]

Posts