Forum

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Dolphin’s Pearl is very hard to bonus and can pay very little when it does. My first ever bonus on that game went for 90 spins and 750x, never come close since then. These games should be played with a strict spin limit – I usually give them 100 – otherwise your balance is probably gone even if you do land the scatters.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Happy days indeed! My personal best is £2.60 to £3k. That one is a fond memory.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Bonanza has always been pretty good to me compared to most people it seems, but this is my biggest ever win on the game. And funnily enough the night before I’d been lying in bed thinking one day Bonanza, one day I’m gonna have my day ans hit that 1000x bonus on you.

Weirdly, I’d just had a 60x bonus on it right before this one and having seen a feature I was about to leave the game and just a sudden strong gut feeling it was about to do something good. Even thought about upping my stake to £2 but didn’t in case I was wrong. Thought I’d just have another 10 spins just in case my feeling was right, then this bad boy rolled in. Actually not the first time a game has paid big right after I had a prophetic feeling I should stay on it.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I’ve deposited 12k+ on betfair – and cashed out 10k+ (no longer have an account), but never EVER verified !!  Casumo now asking for verification after a deposit of about 2k, with 2k withdrawn.

The GC would love to hear about Betfair if that’s true; the law is very clear, you MUST be verified as soon as your total withdrawals hit £2k.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I used to think this but the reality is if 90% of your spins are on low stales obviously most of your bonuses will be too, so it creates that illusion. Actually one of my biggest ever wins on Captain Venture was £1.50 stake, 3 times higher than what I normally play at. But it is annoying when like last week I only had a few quid in the balance and was bashing it on 10p, of course that’s when a bloody 540x bonus hits and not any of the 80p spins I’d been giving it earlier.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I seem to have different experiences with this game to most people. I’ve had my share of annoyances and bad bonuses and endless missing teases on it, but only once have I had to give up and abandon it without getting a bonus at all, which was after about 600 spins. But I play it a lot and will get bonuses, it’s actually one of my go to games for building a balance. Seven bonuses on it yesterday, five of which were decent. Got one land only a dozen spins after the last one.

Bonanza must like me I guess!

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Well, you’re sort of right. Computers can only generate pseudo-random numbers based on an input “seed number” to an algorithm, however gambling software utilise either hardware or software generated cryptographically secure pseudo random number generators. In short, either RNG hardware which measures unpredictable quantum phenomena such as a photon passing through a partially reflective surface, or software measuring equally unpredictable device phenomena such as open file handles, processing threads and the like, are used to generate the input seed which makes the resulting number sufficiently random i.e. not based on microtime and therefore not even in principle predictable in advance.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I find Rhino hard to bonus these days, still Bonus Guarantee 9 times out of 10 though! Best win I ever had was about £240 on 40p stake, it was Rhinos all across with a couple of x3 multipliers.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I don’t play any Blueprint games. If I wanted to stake £2 a spin on a 1 in a million shot at winning £500, I’d go to the bookies and do it on a FOBT.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

A lot of people say providers need a new licence to update a game, I’d like to know the source of this because as far as I’m aware, they are only required to undergo re-testing on the same licence for changes to software. And I know the Greentubes have just undergone a software update because many of them have changed the UI. Provided the overall RTP and fairness has not changed, I don’t see why a new licence would be required but this still allows them to tweak the odds of certain game play aspects as long as they don’t affect overall RTP. I might be wrong, but I’ve never seen anything from the GC to say otherwise.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Last week I actually did finally hit a bonus on Diamond Mine, it rolled in 5 scatters straight up on my 4th spin. Wasn’t great though, £30 on 60p stake.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

Same mate, last three weeks I had a mental run of luck and ended up about £2k up (I play primarily on 30-50p stakes) but last few days half of that has gone, despite hitting a lot of features many of them just haven’t paid me well. Still well up for the month and taking a break for a couple of weeks now so I don’t spunk what I have left.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

I got Gold +5 +5 (22 spin trigger) the other day, paid less than 50x.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

They probably wouldn’t have known if you hadn’t won and subsequently tried to withdraw, if you used a different email address, it’s the sort of thing which would only come up during the due diligence on withdrawals. But then you said you were verified which makes it at least interesting that your name and date of birth wasn’t flagged at that stage. Were your address and card different too?

It’s unfortunate but entirely fair by the casino. You’re getting your deposits back, unlike the guy who posted here recently about Mr Green.

I sincerely don’t mean this unkindly but I don’t tend to have much sympathy for people when they complain about casinos in any way which amounts to “Casino won’t pay out because I [insert obvious violation of terms and conditions here]” – I know it can happen by accident and it sucks and I feel for you to that extent, but ultimately it is as much the player responsibility to check these things and know what they’re signing up for and what they have signed up for. Self exclusion and bonus restrictions are the ones people most commonly fall foul of.

[ar argyl53 WANTED $419 Outlaw]

My general advice regarding online casinos is stay away from high street names. Sky, William Hill, Coral etc. – never had any luck on any of them. I’ll stick with the online only brands like Casumo and Videoslots, way better selection of games anyway.

[Author]

Posts