Forum Menu
Forum Info
- Town Status : Outlaw
- Wanted Reward: $136
- Topics Started : 34
- Replies Created : 445
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I think the best site play at is Johnny jackpot or captain spins they give out regular bonuses of 10% put 250% and only 35x wager and as soon as you start spinning you start wagering and you can cash out before you hit your bonus money plus they have great selection of games
You shouldn’t play at any Aspire gaming sites. I tell everyone the same. Once you’ve made your first withdrawal with them, they will make it so you’re not allowed to take any bonuses from any of their sites ever again.
I do agree that they should get better at pointing out how their bonuses work. I think they should stick with the industry standard, and stop trying to be so fucking special.
The only bonus in comparison that’s actually good is the one at the leovegas sister site. Royal Panda or whatever. There you get to play with the bonus funds once your deposited funds are gone, and you can run the bonus funds as high as you can manage, but you need to deposit more to clear the wagering. However, the wagering is based on the original bonus amount, and not the amount you got the balance up to.
Anyway, yes, this videoslots bonus is asshoe.
The volatility of roulette is determined by how many numbers you cover, simple as that. Rolla tends to put a lot on six or seven numbers on a particular wheel section. Obviously if you cover 30 numbers you’re a lot more likely to get a hit but for a much lower proportionate return on your bet. And obviously if you play immersive roulette, you can cover 36 out of 37 numbers and still lose.
This. It’s pretty self explanatory.
It’s hard to say for sure what’s what, but I do believe the media is oversensationalizing this to make moneyThey absolutely are. But that’s about the only point that you have raised on this topic that I actually agree with.
Well.. Some of what I posted are my opinions and interpretations of the situation, but a lot of what I posted are facts. Like how different countries have different criteria for what qualifies as corona deaths. Amongst others.
Nice attempt to discredit a statement without any argument at all. Is your life really boring enough for you to find joy in throwing insults on the internet at random people you don’t know?3 family members are front line on the covid ward here in Blackpool. It’s worrying times and the garbage you’re posting isn’t helpful. By your way of looking at it, from the second we are born we are dying, so therefore nobody dies of anything other than that.
You say I’m throwing insults, the last message to me you called me an asshat
I’m sorry about your family members, I truly am. Do they not have any other medical conditions either? Cus reports from Italy said 99.2% of those who died had underlying medical conditions. Logic then says the remaining 0.8% then had unidentified underlying conditions, don’t you think?
Yes, I called you an asshat in a response to you being a cunt for no reason. Pretty fair
You are absolutely spot on, the difference now in UK is covid will only be recorded as a cause of death if the coroner records it so…. so UK wise you’ll see the numbers slow…. buuutttttt the argument that the nhs is having ( and ill just use my partners hospital as an example ), if a cancer patient caught flu ( for example ) and died, was it the cancer that killed them ? Kind of No … did it help having it ? No …equally did the flu kill them ? Kind of no , but flu and the cancer made it easier for pnumonia to set in ( as an example ) so it’s recorded as a “joint causes of death” with the cancer outlined as the bulk cause .. the length of time somebody has left ( if we presume is more than a few days ) is somewhat irrelevant… so the nhs are arguing ( at least in this area ) that anything that shortens a predicted life span, even in a terminal case … has to be recorded as such …because that is the way the guide lines have always outlined
“ All other important diseases or conditions that were present at the time of death and that may have contributed to the death, but did not lead to the underlying cause of death “
the government want this scrubbed ( and I’m not making this political ) because obviously end of life patients, or seriously Ill people who catch covid (and dying through their frailty ) are distorting the numbers…but If most ( even terminal ) are dying sooner than their predicted time then It has to be acknowledged that something else was there , I don’t know the answer and I’m not judging anybody who has an opinion…. but we record pneumonia with cause of death such as cancers, so I believe we should record covid ……..even if that reflects a high number
Thing is that cancer is not something you catch from others, and Covid-19 hasn’t killed anyone without underlying medical conditions, so giving Covid-19 the blame for a terminal patient catching it and dying comes off as wrong to me. But hey, that’s just my 2 cents. We’ll see what’s what when the storm has settled. Pretty sure it’s just overrated media hype to be honest.
COVID-19 has killed many people without any underlying health conditions, what rock are you under?
Hearth conditions, diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure, lung diseases and tons of other things count as underlying health conditions. Nobody who’s perfectly healthy has died from the virus. Just cus someone doesn’t have an identified diagnosis doesn’t mean they don’t have an underlying condition. It’s pretty simple and basic stuff to understand that when some people don’t even notice they’ve been infected before they’re virus free, it means people who die from it have underlying conditions. Covid-19 doesn’t kill anyone by itself.
For someone with the 3rd highest IQ in the world, you’re not that bright
Nice attempt to discredit a statement without any argument at all. Is your life really boring enough for you to find joy in throwing insults on the internet at random people you don’t know?
virgin games is no longer than 3 hours and it is back in your bank why cant all casino be like that
Cus not all casinos have accounts in your country. Virgin very likely do.
It could also be that doa2 is banned with bonus funds on that casino, which then broke the terms and conditions. It’s a shame because that money would probably have helped the winner out in the situation that we are currently in ?
The most likely reason in my opinion. DoA2 is as close to a progressive jackpot game you can get without it actually being a jackpot game in my opinion, and I don’t know any casinos that allow you to play jackpot games with bonus funds, so it sounds very likely.
1You are absolutely spot on, the difference now in UK is covid will only be recorded as a cause of death if the coroner records it so…. so UK wise you’ll see the numbers slow…. buuutttttt the argument that the nhs is having ( and ill just use my partners hospital as an example ), if a cancer patient caught flu ( for example ) and died, was it the cancer that killed them ? Kind of No … did it help having it ? No …equally did the flu kill them ? Kind of no , but flu and the cancer made it easier for pnumonia to set in ( as an example ) so it’s recorded as a “joint causes of death” with the cancer outlined as the bulk cause .. the length of time somebody has left ( if we presume is more than a few days ) is somewhat irrelevant… so the nhs are arguing ( at least in this area ) that anything that shortens a predicted life span, even in a terminal case … has to be recorded as such …because that is the way the guide lines have always outlined
“ All other important diseases or conditions that were present at the time of death and that may have contributed to the death, but did not lead to the underlying cause of death “
the government want this scrubbed ( and I’m not making this political ) because obviously end of life patients, or seriously Ill people who catch covid (and dying through their frailty ) are distorting the numbers…but If most ( even terminal ) are dying sooner than their predicted time then It has to be acknowledged that something else was there , I don’t know the answer and I’m not judging anybody who has an opinion…. but we record pneumonia with cause of death such as cancers, so I believe we should record covid ……..even if that reflects a high number
Thing is that cancer is not something you catch from others, and Covid-19 hasn’t killed anyone without underlying medical conditions, so giving Covid-19 the blame for a terminal patient catching it and dying comes off as wrong to me. But hey, that’s just my 2 cents. We’ll see what’s what when the storm has settled. Pretty sure it’s just overrated media hype to be honest.
COVID-19 has killed many people without any underlying health conditions, what rock are you under?
Hearth conditions, diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure, lung diseases and tons of other things count as underlying health conditions. Nobody who’s perfectly healthy has died from the virus. Just cus someone doesn’t have an identified diagnosis doesn’t mean they don’t have an underlying condition.
It’s pretty simple and basic stuff to understand that when some people don’t even notice they’ve been infected before they’re virus free, it means people who die from it have underlying conditions. Covid-19 doesn’t kill anyone by itself.You are absolutely spot on, the difference now in UK is covid will only be recorded as a cause of death if the coroner records it so…. so UK wise you’ll see the numbers slow…. buuutttttt the argument that the nhs is having ( and ill just use my partners hospital as an example ), if a cancer patient caught flu ( for example ) and died, was it the cancer that killed them ? Kind of No … did it help having it ? No …equally did the flu kill them ? Kind of no , but flu and the cancer made it easier for pnumonia to set in ( as an example ) so it’s recorded as a “joint causes of death” with the cancer outlined as the bulk cause .. the length of time somebody has left ( if we presume is more than a few days ) is somewhat irrelevant… so the nhs are arguing ( at least in this area ) that anything that shortens a predicted life span, even in a terminal case … has to be recorded as such …because that is the way the guide lines have always outlined
“ All other important diseases or conditions that were present at the time of death and that may have contributed to the death, but did not lead to the underlying cause of death “
the government want this scrubbed ( and I’m not making this political ) because obviously end of life patients, or seriously Ill people who catch covid (and dying through their frailty ) are distorting the numbers…but If most ( even terminal ) are dying sooner than their predicted time then It has to be acknowledged that something else was there , I don’t know the answer and I’m not judging anybody who has an opinion…. but we record pneumonia with cause of death such as cancers, so I believe we should record covid ……..even if that reflects a high number
Thing is that cancer is not something you catch from others, and Covid-19 hasn’t killed anyone without underlying medical conditions, so giving Covid-19 the blame for a terminal patient catching it and dying comes off as wrong to me. But hey, that’s just my 2 cents. We’ll see what’s what when the storm has settled. Pretty sure it’s just overrated media hype to be honest.
I’ve never heard of a voided win, anyone know how that can happen??
There can be a number of reasons.
Dodgy casino, bet restriction with active bonus, slot malfunction, max bonus conversion, etc.1The problem with Covid-19 death numbers is that in most countries they give Covid-19 the credit (or blame) for all deaths where it’s involved. The only country I know that automatically give Covid-19 the blame for deaths, unless it’s directly the cause, is Norway. Sweden, UK, US, Italy, Spain etc all count deaths with a covid-19 diagnose as Corona deaths, even if someone already were in their last week of living from cancer or other serious diseases. Due to this, we’re seeing way higher numbers than necessary. Add to that the fact that tons have not been tested and confirmed, which could ultimately bring the Covid-19 deaths below the regular flu death rate.
If you don’t read the news you’re uninformed. If you read the news you’re misinformed.
I thought exactly the same until i saw a stat that said in the week ending i think 3rd of April there were over 16000 deaths in England and Wales which is approximately 6000 over the normal average for this time of year. 60% of these extra 6000 were due to coronavirus where the other 40% were unexplained which I’m guessing are coronavirus deaths in the community mainly care homes. I thought the figures were always exaggerated and cause of death were put down to the virus regardless of any other underlying health conditions. So the question is why are 5 to 6000 extra people dying each week. My theory is unfortunately coronavirus was the actual cause of death and this virus is taking the lives of people who would still be here if they hadn’t been infected. I do however agree on your theory the death rate is much lower than we are told. Some experts believe up to 15 million people have actually had the virus in the uk with the vast majority been asymptomatic putting the death rate at 0.1% 1 in about 1000.
Well, if the normal is 10,000 deaths for the same period and now there were 16,000 deaths, you can’t just count 60% of 6000 deaths as extra corona deaths. You gotta count based on the total 16,000, cus how can you know which of the 16,000 deaths are the “6000 extra deaths”?
I think it’s pretty obvious the media is hyping up the death rates, and our politicians are just jumping on the bandwagon the media is creating for the popular hype.Just cus you normally have 10,000 deaths in a certain period most years, doesn’t mean 15,000 deaths during the same period next year needs to be a result of anything out of the ordinary. It could just be coincidence. As the world gets more populated we get more immigration and travel, resulting in more shit getting spread out from wherever people came from.
As a comparison, Italy usually has about 600,000 deaths a year. That’s about 1650 deaths a day on average. They’ve not had that many deaths each day during the corona outbreak.Another thing to take notice of is that less people are dying in general all over the world due to lockdowns. Various other things aren’t killing people at the rate it has pre-corona.
It’s hard to say for sure what’s what, but I do believe the media is oversensationalizing this to make money, and people love doomsday prophecies, so they embrace this shit and swallow it raw, without thinking logically or critically at all. Well, most seem to, not everyone.
But despite me being critical of what I’m being told, I’m not jumping on some conspiracy theory crap here. Let’s not go as far as certain people do.The problem with Covid-19 death numbers is that in most countries they give Covid-19 the credit (or blame) for all deaths where it’s involved. The only country I know that automatically give Covid-19 the blame for deaths, unless it’s directly the cause, is Norway. Sweden, UK, US, Italy, Spain etc all count deaths with a covid-19 diagnose as Corona deaths, even if someone already were in their last week of living from cancer or other serious diseases.
Due to this, we’re seeing way higher numbers than necessary. Add to that the fact that tons have not been tested and confirmed, which could ultimately bring the Covid-19 deaths below the regular flu death rate.If you don’t read the news you’re uninformed. If you read the news you’re misinformed.
-
AuthorPosts