Forum

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Who cares??….. Im pretty sure we’d all rather watch any Bandit video…. Whether he got the bonuses himself or not…. than sit through any of Craig’s videos.

I actually feel that if somebody else did get the bonuses, and we watched the resulting outcome with Bandits commentary, that its a genius idea which keeps everyone happy. Steve gets to spend time with his family while someone else does the boring grind, we all get a bandit video. Win win?

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

I kind of feel the OP has a point here. Yes, the original (now locked) post was a bit of a ranting and raging, but as it turns out, rightly so. Steve actually took the time to make a video to say as much.

He admittedly didn’t know that VS had changed their terms regarding the weekend booster, which is fine, and he quite rightly admitted as much….. But think the whole point of this guys rage, is that he watched a load of Bandits videos, saw him clocking up a tasty balance through his weekend booster and decided to give it a go and try and do the same, without knowing (and how could he???) that VS have now changed the rules so its one rule for old players, another for new.

I agree that Bandit should have at least, as one of their affiliates, been informed of the change so he could have (and without doubt, would have) informed any sign ups about the change.

Basically, it’s VS who’ve been the shithouses, as they didn’t inform their affiliates of the changes, and Bandit acknowledged this with the video…… So genuinely have sympathy for the OP.

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Dynamik23 wrote:

ayma4quit wrote:

Am I being a bit thick, but the whole point of roulette gives the house a very slight (3%ish??) edge….. So with lightning Roulette offering silly odds on numbers, wouldn’t it be long term profitable to cover every number, every spin??

Apologies if I’m way off the mark here, not done the maths properly, just an observation

You only get 30-1 on a number. I don’t know and I’ve searched but couldn’t find it, but my intuition tells me the house edge is higher on lightning roulette than European roulette. There are strategy’s that say you should just cover every number as when you hit the 500x you should be slightly up or winning but it’s basically the martingale where its lower volatility but you’ll still be down at the end of it all.

Cheers Dynamik…..The old case of when something appears too good to be true, it usually is. Didn’t know it paid 30/1 per spin.

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Biohazard wrote:

Haz40 wrote:

Does lightning roulette only pay 30/1 instead of normal roulette 35/1 ?

Correct!

30 to 1, so you’re losing quite a lot each spin. The RTP works out.

Thankyou, didn’t realise it only paid 30/1……Question answered, and moving onto the next moneymaking project ??

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Haz40 wrote:

Does lightning roulette only pay 30/1 instead of normal roulette 35/1 ?

If that’s the case, that’s my question answered thankyou Haz….. Didn’t know that was the case.

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Rbreen91 wrote:

It doesn’t always land a lightning number. So no.

Obviously they don’t alway land on a lightning number, but they are applied on every spin, so you lose 1X every spin, until it does land….. What am I missing??

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

awesomex wrote:

ayma4quit wrote:

awesomex wrote:

This Xbobmad fucker really never has anything to bring to the table. All he ever does is throw insults. How about a counter argument? Pretty ironic to call someone an idiot and not present a single counter argument ever.

Remember when you fucked off from this forum because everyone thought you were a prick…… Heads up, nothings changed in your absence.

Remember how I didn’t give a shit? Guess what, I still don’t.

As for the virus, they’ve done antibody testing in California, and they’ve compared the number of infected (past and present) and measured it up against the number of deaths, excluded the ones who died who were 80+, and found out that for an average person of average age and average health, the mortality rate is 0.02%.

Oh and as for Norway, as I mentioned earlier, idiots, Norway only counts deaths DIRECTLY caused by Covid-19 as corona deaths. Most countries don’t. Almost everyone else count deaths where Covid-19 was present as corona deaths, no matter if they were killed by another illness.

I remember you gave enough of a shit that you fucked off,and saved us a good few months of having to listen to your self aggrandised horseshit.

Please can you not give a shit again in the near future??

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

awesomex wrote:

This Xbobmad fucker really never has anything to bring to the table. All he ever does is throw insults. How about a counter argument? Pretty ironic to call someone an idiot and not present a single counter argument ever.

Remember when you fucked off from this forum because everyone thought you were a prick…… Heads up, nothings changed in your absence.

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Bitter much??

Really don’t understand how anyone can be upset that somebody has had a big hit and they havn’t.

Congrats to the OP’s mate, hope its life changing for him and he doesn’t spunk it all back.

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Please please please send us one of your Burberry baseball cap?

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Rbreen91 wrote:

Dynamik23 wrote:

Imo I would pay back any debt I have. I’ve never had a loan, went into my overdraft or borrowed money I couldn’t pay back the very same day from friends and family. However if a law exists like this then you can’t blame someone for using it. People seem riled up about him suggesting to use a loophole for not paying back debt but these massive companies are doing the exact same thing in regards to taxes and debts, so why shouldn’t the little man at the bottom be allowed to do the same thing.

This prick’s advice to someone who got other people to borrow money for him (which was ridiculously stupid in the first place) was to fuck the people who borrowed money for him off, and don’t pay them a penny, and let other people deal with his mistakes. This is the main reason why people think the guy’s a piece of shit cunt.

No “think” about it. 100% guaranteed shit cunt.

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

lainey87 wrote:

I’m debt free. Just because your in debt doesn’t mean you have to go around being angry at everyone else.. I was only sharing pictures of a few wins. Now your pissed off because someone else knew the law and you didn’t? Get out of here.. go crawl back under your rock.. it’s a public forum. Maybe if you didn’t spend all your time gambling and sat on here you could of gone to university to learn about law and debt.. but nope, you spent 34 years gambling. You can give it but you can’t take it.. stay mirin bro

I chose to pay it back. I could have gone bankrupt, so not pissed off or jealous or angry in the slightest.

I chose to pay it back because I was the one who spent it. It wasn’t my money. You chose to steal it. You borrowed money with the full knowledge that you had no intention of repaying it. That, in all but name, is theft. Maybe you could pass on your vast knowledge to a few bank robbers, save em a shit load of aggro and jail time.

No point arguing with someone who has no moral compass. Every single person on this forum can see that you are the scum of the earth, the sort of person who applied to go on Jeremy Kyle for some street cred.

You’re pure vermin pal.

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Dynamik23 wrote:

Imo I would pay back any debt I have. I’ve never had a loan, went into my overdraft or borrowed money I couldn’t pay back the very same day from friends and family. However if a law exists like this then you can’t blame someone for using it. People seem riled up about him suggesting to use a loophole for not paying back debt but these massive companies are doing the exact same thing in regards to taxes and debts, so why shouldn’t the little man at the bottom be allowed to do the same thing.

If that was the case, everyone would do it but it’s not (despite what the fuckwit says). EVERY single piece of advice from every possible source that I received said to NOT ignore the debt. If you’re thick enough to go down his chosen route, do you think that all the credit companies and banks will just say “ah, nice one, you’ve read a paragraph in Chav Weekly that says you don’t have to pay it back, we’ll played” and let it, and the money go??…. Will they fuck. If they can’t get it back off the debtor, they simply spread it around a bit in other forms and get it back off you, me and every other non-lowlife, honest, moral person which leaves all the smug Jeremy Kyle types thinking they’re the wolf of fucking wall street.

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Ahh piss off, we all know that’s Rhyl …..

He should’ve gone to Rhyl and saved a few quid to get that dogshit tattoo finished.

[ayma4quit WANTED $47 Outlaw]

lainey87 wrote:

ayma4quit wrote:

lainey87 wrote:

Not my fault the law states debt is statue barred after 6 years. That’s law

That may be, but who’s fault is it that you turned out to be a piece of pond life??

says the one who wrote this..

‘have gambled since the age of 14…I’m now 48’

 

What the fuck is that???…. Is English your first language??.

Think you’re missing the point here. I got into £69K of debt through gambling, I’ve repaid over £50K and will continue until its cleared…thats what non-pondlife do. They take responsibility for their actions.

You think you’re being all smart and clever using “the law” when in actual fact, you are coming across to 99.9% of people here as complete vermin. Lower than low scum. The fact that you don’t care about this view just reinforces the fact that you are sub-human, comparative to stuff you scrape off your shoe with a stick,a complete drain on society and someone who most people wouldn’t piss on if they were on fire.

Hope that’s cleared things up a bit for your IQ free brain.

[Author]

Posts