Forum Menu
Forum Info
- Town Status : Outlaw
- Wanted Reward: $47
- Topics Started : 10
- Replies Created : 87
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Not my fault the law states debt is statue barred after 6 years. That’s law
That may be, but who’s fault is it that you turned out to be a piece of pond life??
I’m surprised they didn’t hide for 6 years and then say tough luck, you can break every bone in our bodies or even kill us but you’re not getting your £7109.01
what i miss here?!
The OP’s less than helpful debt advice on another thread…. Basically, never pay back a penny that you owe.
You won’t have a leg to stand on as clearly you breached the terms.
yes I agree it’s harsh, but had you played at a decent casino you wouldn’t have this problem.
also this site or it’s members can’t help you, they are fanboys and bandit is only a affiliate. they don’t care.
register at a real site and sign up only via accredited casinos and you won’t have this issue.
So do everyone a favour and fuck off from this “unreal” site ya toxic cunt
19th February 2020 at 10:42 am in reply to: Where can an ex-gambler borrow money when its urgent?! #91393This reply has been reported for inappropriate content.
Haha what nonsense. The guys clearly a troll. if he’s lost all his money then he’s a fool and deserved it.
you can’t be on here preaching RG and defending the sites owner, it’s a oxymoron. It’s that simple.
gambling addiction isn’t a addiction, it’s a choice.
it he’s lost everything and in is a bad way he certainly wouldn’t come to a small site like this to help himself, it’s a lie and laughable.
you clowns Commenting are just as bad, a guy loses his life and all he owns, yet comes on the bandits website for help!!! HahahahahaahahhahahahhaaahhHHhHhahahahahaahahah!!! Oh! HahhhahahhhHh
Best part of you ran down the inside of your mums thigh, pondlife prick
Yep, I always pop down the pub for advice on stopping drinking.
Maybe you should go to Alcoholics Anonymous instead… you know… a place filled with alcoholics, but that’s never helped anyone.
Bellend needs to check out where his local meeting of cunts anonymous is.
There is 12 fucking pages of this? Jesus.
Some actual thoughts.
1 – The draw wasnt to get people to sign up. The fuck is the point?
2 – The draw was real, he has given away more on many occasions.
3 – If you cheated to get many entries, go fuck a toilet plunger.
4 – If you didnt and you feel misled, sure i understand. But your odds of winning were tiny and you got to have these hours of fun complaining. So you do benefit a bit.
*5* – Yes it could have been better. Holding a draw like this with no IP block or security as an open giveaway was suicidal at best, and utterly moronic at worst. The word has changed with VPN and such allowing this to happen. So really the blame lies everywhere. But cancelling it and giving it to charity is the best cop out that creates a win/win for all. So lets just be happy that some kids may be saved.
Charity request – St Davids Hospice in Llandudno. I raised 1.5k for them on my facebook for my birthday by pushing casinos to donate instead of buying me wine or some shite.
Are you from North Wales pal??…. Great shout for a donation…. Seconded?
27th November 2019 at 6:21 pm in reply to: Gambling, Suicide and Gamstop – It’s finally over. #83973Thanks for sharing mate, all that sounds very familiar. In my darkest moments, I thought about ending it all, but literally didn’t have the balls to do it.
I attended GA for 3 years and whilst it might not be everyone’s cup of tea, it genuinely helped me understand the addiction. I’ve gambled since, but never quite as recklessly before and have never been in the shit with money because of what I learned. I too have now signed up to Gamstop and it feels like a weight off the shoulders
Sincere best wishes for the future, stay strong and take it a day at a time.
I get the feeling we’re talking at cross purposes a bit here!
Argyl’s statement around the dice is mathematically correct, but the application is different to what ayma is talking about (I believe).
If you deposit £20 on three separate sessions, this is exactly the same as depositing £60 on one single session, assuming all other variables (stakes, RTP etc.) remain the same. There is no advantage, nor disadvantage.
Apologies if I’ve misunderstood anyone here.
Exactly my point Bio, if betting at a consistent same stake, it really makes no difference if its a £20 or £60 deposit. I confess that Argyls dice point impressed me with the maths but I realised I just thought about the same thing in a different way i.e the more spins you do, the closer to RTP you get which decreases your longterm odds.
You’ll get more spins in the one session which gives you a better chance overall. It’s like buying 10 tickets for the same lottery draw instead of 1 ticket each for 10 separate draws.
Chances are exactly equal there again though……Sorry,but that’s simply not correct. The grouping of bets has absolutely no effect on the chances of you winning.
They’re not exactly equal. I’ll scale it down to explain why. Imagine a simple dice roll and you get to place a bet on the outcome.
You buy 3 separate £1 tickets for 3 separate rolls, all betting on the outcome being 6.
Your total probability of winning on any one of those is 43%, since it is the combined probability of 1 – (1st roll not 6) x (2nd roll not 6) x (3rd roll not 6). On each roll, you have a 5 in 6 chance of not winning, so combined probability of not winning comes to 57%.
Next you buy a single ticket for £3 for a single roll, but cover 3 numbers; 2, 4 and 6. Your chance of winning here is 50%, since you straightforwardly have 50% of the possible outcomes covered.
Not too proud to admit when I’m wrong…. Can’t argue with that calculation. It messes with my head as even though its obviously correct, I can’t help but feel something isn’t quite right with the scenario when comparing it to slots or the lottery.
The dice analogy is basically saying that your best chance of winning is to lump all your money on one roll rather than spread it out over 3 rolls, which you’ve unarguably proved correct, so based on that, in theory wouldn’t your best chance of winning be (and I’m in no way saying this is the way to do it, just purely from a maths point of view) to deposit whatever you can afford, and lump it all on one spin??….. Am I correct in saying the more spins you do, the closer you get to achieving RTP so the greater chance of losing in the long run.
Your dice scenario basically says that to achieve your best chance of winning, reduce the number of spins and up the stake.
Not picking an argument here, genuinely interested how the maths can disprove the way one brain thinks.
You’ll get more spins in the one session which gives you a better chance overall. It’s like buying 10 tickets for the same lottery draw instead of 1 ticket each for 10 separate draws.
Chances are exactly equal there again though……Sorry,but that’s simply not correct. The grouping of bets has absolutely no effect on the chances of you winning.
1Just do 1 deposit a week but 60 pound deposit , instead off 3 20 pound deposits . Better chance off hitting something good .
How have you got a better chance of hitting something good depositing 1 x £60 as opposed to 3 x £20 when each spin is completely random???….. Id say you have exactly the same chance either way or am I missing something??
1Had a beer so decided to see how this post was progressing, really felt strongly about what had gone on… and said so.
Absolute respect to @seedy for his actions, and a doff of the cap as you’ve obviously got the toughest job in the world moderating a bunch of degenerates(apologies to those not in that classification)
This place is better off, as a collective, without people like him involved…..I truly value this forum, it helps massively from a personal point of view, so apologies if my earlier rant sounded like a spoilt child, but I’m made up he won’t be able to participate anymore
Massive error of judgement letting this guy back on in my humble opinion. I remember reading the original thread which caused the (rightly so) uproar with total horror.
I know this isn’t GA, but what he did was actively encourage a compulsive gambler doing really well in his recovery, to gamble. That’s akin to putting Peter Sutcliffe in charge of the hand held tool department in B & Q. Its that reprehensible.
I’m guessing that the majority of people on this forum actually aren’t compulsive gamblers, so maybe they can’t understand the severity or potential consequences of what this piece of pondscum did. If you’ve ever been at rock bottom because of gambling, you will.
And the first thing he posts is a “You too could turn £25 into a few grand” thread, including glorious screenshots of huge wins.
This person is a cunt. An unadulterated, fully-fledged, badge wearing cunt.
And you’ve let him back in.
One in, one out
Bye
2 -
AuthorPosts