Forum

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Cheers guys! Rereading this post, clearly I was giddy last night ?

Over the moon. Still can’t believe it. The x2 wildline (which landed when the video starts) was good enough, and then it just kept adding more wilds. So lucky.

This was maybe my 40th to 50th bonus. Prior to that I’d had the five wild retrigger just the once, but no wildline (paid about 50x). About 90% of those bonuses gave me between 0 and 2 wilds.

I must reiterate – please don’t be tempted to chase this based on this win. As Mickey said, it’s a hit of a lifetime. It is far, far from easy to land.

I’m going to do a bonus hunt giveaway competition on this forum – watch this space. 🙂

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I don’t know what I think about this game. I think it’s certainly fun, but I had an a pretty bad experience last night.

Took me ageeeess to build two separate swarms. Spent a decent amount once on max to land the swarm on £2 stake, but didn’t take a crazy amount of bees (think 20ish both times). First went for 10x. The second went for 30x.

Ended up doing a third on £1 stake and it went for over £500 so great result, but bittersweet due to the stake change haha!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Argyl designed a mod that will basically remove any posts from your browser from any users that you choose to block. It’s not serverside or anything, but it does the job!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Really nice win bud, especially with a low paying symbol!

This game is on my ban list. Worked a balance up from £90 to £1,900 last night. Lost it all on £3 spins on BoD.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

1- Most Passionate – JB

2- Most Likeable – Haz

3- Most Controversial – JB

4- Most Loyal – Haz

5- Most Generous – Bandit

6- Most Genuine – Green

7- Most Loveable – DEVIL4POSTER

8- Most Funny – Rbreen

11- Most Baiting – Rbreen

I know I’ve got some duplicates here, just first names that came to mind for each section. 😀

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

@argyl53 – I never said it was sufficient, but at the very least they should warrant refunds for those who bet on 4 rolls, ideally with some form of compensation. But they haven’t even done that! I agree with the average 4 roll bonus payout – they do know it, as they list the RTP. It’s around 50x if you take the mean.

@burders – I don’t know how it happened. Either a sensor error, software error or human error. I don’t believe that there is any intentional corruption utilised.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

No idea why they called it ‘extreme’, but it’s basically just a redesign. Looks nicer, much smoother.

From my own gameplay, it seems to retrigger more often in the bonus, but seems to be more difficult to get to x300.

There’s also a bonus buy option!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Fruit Warp, Wild Heist at Peacock Manor, Laser Fruit and Falcon Huntress.

Three are from Thunderkick. ?

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Biohazard wrote:

The right thing for Evolution to do here, would be to run the 4 rolls as it was supposed to be anyway and take the 10 loss on the chin – it’s their mistake after all, not the player’s.

Just thinking about it… not even sure that this is possible, linking back to the point I made above. As far as I know, there is no system in place to ‘repost’ the bets that were made (as they would have been cleared after paying out on the 10) and then run the 4 rolls. There should be, but I don’t think there is.

So, I think what should (have) happened is…

1) The host explains the protocol for this kind of issue, apologises, and advises the players on how to approach a refund
2) The players raise a complaint with their casino that they played Monopoly Live on, listing the date and time of bet
3) The casino refunds the player the full amount of the bet, with perhaps some form of compensation as a gesture of goodwill
4) The casino then approaches Evolution for a refund of returned bets (assuming of course there isn’t a stipulation in the contract that the casino is accountable for Evolution’s own mistakes)

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Winningbird wrote:

Ahh I didn’t  think about that haha. Thanks for clearing that one up bio ? what do you think about the video though? It clearly showed 4 rolls and in the video it says staff marked it down wrong. Surely this should have given the players their bets back as good will because it was a fault on the providers side?

I honestly don’t quite know what to make of it.

So, once the number has been confirmed (not sure what the protocol is for this, always assumed it was just a sensor, but I know at times it takes them a while to register so I thought maybe they have someone there to verify and manually submit), the money is paid out immediately to the players that won.

In this case, they incorrectly registered it as a ten. This meant that any players who bet on 10 got their money, which can’t be retracted (as far as I’m aware). The right thing for Evolution to do here, would be to run the 4 rolls as it was supposed to be anyway and take the 10 loss on the chin – it’s their mistake after all, not the player’s. Failing this, at the very least they should refund all bets made by those who bet on 4 rolls (effectively cancelling the game, but post-result). Now, I’m not sure that this is possible, as they are just a provider. What will probably need to happen is, the casino would manage the complaints with their players, refund them and then take this up themselves with Evolution.

For me, the worst part about this was that the players weren’t even provided with an explanation, and used a new host as a scapegoat.

Disgusting. No other way to put it.

Again, do I think Monopoly Live is rigged? No. However it seems that Evolution have some very poor management and contingency plans in place.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Wow, lots of weird stuff happening here. I can’t actually defend either of these last two examples. Unless there is more to the story, this is just plain grim.

It’s a shame, as I do enjoy Monopoly Live, but there seems to be an awful lot of poor decision making here.

@Winningbird – in that example, that’s just because it was a two rolls but there were doubles which mean it went for three rolls (it just switches between the two to show you!).

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

23rd September 7:46pm.

If I win please donate to a charity of your choosing 🙂

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I love Legacy of Egypt but hate it at the same time! I enjoy playing it, but man it does some infuriating things. The amount of times I’ve had 20 spins with no retriggers and like 10x final win is crazy. And it does love landing on 3 or 4 far too much too.

On the brightside, it does seem to bonus a lot more frequently than Montezuma does!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Seedy wrote:

I think all payment methods should disappear and there should be something like a gamblers card that in which an individual may apply for it and be given a card with a limit of transferable cash to it per month. The application for this card could be very much like a mortgage where they look at your yearly earning then debts ie loan repayments and how much you spend on household stuff like food then say ok sir/madam after all information is collected it is recommended that you have £xx per month available to top up your card. You also have to agree that in your application that all the information you give is true and correct same as a mortgage application and if you lie to get more available funds at that point it’s your own fault and your revoked banning you from gambling online until such a time you can re-apply after a face to face meeting :/

So in summary what would this method achieve.

1. Set a monthly deposit allowance.

2. Controlled gambling.

3. Self-accountability if you lie on your application it is your fault but the damage is still limited.

4. Easier to track as its one central card system.

I dunno its an idea but very feasible to me some people even though they don’t have a problem wouldn’t like the system but is it better for the greater good? there’s probably more that could be done in regards to this idea to make it more suitable. any thoughts?

 

I really like this. But I don’t see it ever happening unfortunately. 🙁

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I think it has to happen. Not enough is done to protect gamblers from themselves. I am all about accountability, but at the end of the day it’s an addiction, just like any other.

For me personally, I think it will be a pain. But do I think it’s right? Yes.

[Author]

Posts