Forum

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I’ve always used CorrectCasinos in the past when wanting to force bonuses, but it’s only available on Blueprints. Try that!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

So… anyone else here want to name their next child Roshtein, or just me?

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

awesomex wrote:

Let me just add that I’m a mensa member with a measured and verified IQ of 180. Only 1 in 3.5 million people understand logics as well as I do, so unless you’re one of them, you’re not even gonna be able to follow the argument on the level I’m presenting it.

I see patterns in everything, and everyone still stand on their claims that their man made products are random. It makes no sense at all.

Wow. ?

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

@awesomex you are wrong I’m afraid. I try not to get sucked into these debates anymore after having had them thousands of times before, however what you are saying is harmful and incorrect, so it’s important that the story is put straight.

Other members have already articulated how online slots work quite nicely, so I won’t duplicate the effort and repeat what they have said.

However, it does always baffle me when people bring up random not being able to guarantee RTP. Randomness is an excellent control mechanism. Short term, yes, it is volatile, and yes there is the slim chance that someone could win the jackpot several times in a row (which can be mitigated in itself with max payouts, max bet caps etc.), however long term the actual RTP will be broadly in-line with the theoretical RTP.

How does this work? The law of large numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_large_numbers

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I hear that hugs fix all…

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Do you up the bet on any other slots in this way? If the answer is no, then this slot shouldn’t be any different!

Haha, I do get why people play Wild Swarm in this way, but honestly it’s no different to landing a bonus on any other slot. But the way it’s designed fools you into implementing a strategy such as this.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Shocking I know @Seedy – today is a good day! ??

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Just Basics wrote:

Think it’s a bit of a lawful con different casinos having lower RTP’s.

Especially if it’s not stated as soon as you load the game.

But from what I can tell, you have to look for it within the game.

I bet most punters wouldn’t even think to see if it’s lower.

That explains my 700 spin non bonus on BOD last week then.

 

I actually agree with you, JB! Was not at all happy when VS announced this, weeks after implementation. And the changes are much more significant than people often realise. I avoid these providers on all casinos now like the plague, just to be safe.

If it is going to happen, then they need to change how they advertise RTP. It needs to be clear.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Masquerade wrote:

But can the overall RTP / model include in-built variance to exploit the player psychology or reduce potentially fatal spikes in the customer(s) (the casinos) losses ??

Can the maths include legitimate switches to the way that the game plays  ?? (e.g. through symbol changes on reels, increases/decreases in random feature chances) . As long as the game plays within its stated RTP then I can’t see why a developer wouldn’t want to make it more exciting for the player-base, but at the same time not wanting to see deviation in hundreds of Steves hitting the top of the ReelKing ladder in quick succession and denting the smaller casino customers. I know that, over time, the game will do what it says without modification but, games get replaced and you don’t want to lose a customer because the are currently down far too much to afford to take on your next game.

As you are testing these games though the billions of spins, are subtle changes being made by the server on the fly to iron out the bumps?? You’re not ‘compensating’ as the RTP has to stay the same – just shifting what percentage of that RTP comes from where.

Not ‘Rigged’ but ‘Dynamically Adapted’

What you have explained is compensating, and no this does not happen with online slots. They are random and not controlled by anything other than the RNG implemented. It will always return to the theoretical RTP over time naturally.

The way in which casinos often deal with variance is by modifying the max bets allowed per slot. DoA2 has some mental potential, and this is why many casinos have capped the max bet to relatively low, to avoid the chance of a ridiculous payout.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I’d also like to know which casinos do and don’t offer the reduced RTP for UK players from the providers in question (e.g. Play n Go, Red Tiger etc.).

For Novo’s, Grosvenor have a great selection, and they’re a great casino. They do look after their loyal customers.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Rbreen91 wrote:

Biohazard wrote:

Fruit Warp, Laser Fruit, Wild Heist at Peacock Manor, Falcon Huntress, Dead or Alive II, T2, Jammin’ Jars and Fishin’ Frenzy Megaways.

Good luck!

Literally never had a decent win on any of these haha. I fucking hate jammin’ Jars. So much potential for every cunt except me. I’m gonna use my 4 grand tax rebate on DoA2 at 90p a spin and see if I get a 200x win haha.

Ah man ?

They’re just a few of my favourites to play! Jammin Jars has given me my biggest win by multiplier (1,800x). Certain had some big losses on many of these though!

Fruit Warp, as people know, I’ve never really had a losing session on it. Everyone has their slot, this is mine for sure!

Let us know how you get on with DoA2! Got my fingers crossed for a 40,000x win for you ?

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Fruit Warp, Laser Fruit, Wild Heist at Peacock Manor, Falcon Huntress, Dead or Alive II, T2, Jammin’ Jars and Fishin’ Frenzy Megaways.

Good luck!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

What is this thread ?

Bandit isn’t a paid subscription… you deposited because you wanted to gamble. Don’t lose your money and then get angry and demand content from Bandit as a result. Insanity.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I don’t think anyone is saying that the gambling sector is whiter than white!

But to apply a generalisation based on history against specific cases, anywhere, is wrong, and certainly doesn’t make for a strong and compelling argument.

It’s almost like saying that a black guy stole from a shop once, so therefore history tells us that all black people are thieves. It’s wrong.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Ahhhhhh I see! Come to think of it, I do remember seeing a post like that. Didn’t think it was him though!

Mad.

[Author]

Posts