Forum

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I always find it bizarre when people are against things like rev share. That money is lost, regardless of who it goes too. People are basically kicking off that the affiliate receives a % of the money rather than the casino getting all of it. Why that is something to kick off about I have no idea. I think ignorance is a key element.

Also I think people are fixated too much on the word “losses”. It’s a share of the casino revenue, which is player’s losses, yes, but if you’re against that, then surely you’re against casinos/gambling as a whole, right?

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

It’s beauuuuuuuutiful ????

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Yea leaning towards Bonanza myself here, seems to be more generous with the wins compared to millionaire!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

The Bandit wrote:

85″ it was lol I will stick a picture on in a min haha oh and sir legend biohazard you need to tell me lots of stuff you like so i can send you gifts lol the fibre is currently attached to the house and awaiting final visit for last couple of metres hook up WOOOHOOOOOO

I’m in Bristol this week for work stuff, but managed to catch the first few mins of your latest video earlier, absolutely buzzing mate! Please let me me know when it’s all done and dusted!!

So happy for you, you don’t owe me anything, I’m just glad I made this work for you, it’s your livelihood 😀 30th did you say for the final visit?

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

82″ naaaaa legit?!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

This is really great :D. Nice one as always Andy!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Just Basics wrote:

Naivety at its finest mate.

We may wear tinfoil hats but they wear a blindfolds and fuckin earmuffs!

How exactly am I being naïve?

It’s funny how in every single debate that you’re involved with on this forum, you refuse to acknowledge logical thinking and simply insult anyone who doesn’t agree with you. I’m also yet to see a single comprehensive argument from you backing up your own views, it’s very weak.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

brizman wrote:

What i don’t get is people that say..’there is no need for casinos to rig games’. There is..GREED AND MONEY

Well there was no reasons for banks to rig interest rates..or company’s to rig test results to sell cars..or mp’s to fudge expenses. I’m afraid cheating goes on in everday life. Mostly at the highest level. If you think that there is no possibility that casinos rig or tamper outcomes to get more money, then that is just naive.

It’s a valid counter-argument to rigging, because it’s all down to risk and reward. Casinos are not only heavily regulated, but they are also heavily scrutinised by their customers.

They can make a safe profit, whilst remaining lawful, or they can make a significant risk and corrupt their own games to turn a slightly higher profit, but the risk of getting caught would be significantly disastrous for them. Negative EV in my eyes, but happy to have the debate.

There are obviously going to be cases of rigging over the years, particularly in the dodgier, lesser known casinos (which often aren’t regulated in the UK), but these cases are few and far between, and just because something happens somewhere, doesn’t mean it always happens everywhere.

@joshnadin articulated this quite well.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

But what are you basing it on? Why don’t you trust them, what evidence do you have?

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

So let me get this straight… the dealer hits 21, twice, and that means it’s rigged? Also I seem to recall Paul switched to video blackjack not live afterwards so it wasn’t even the same game.

Pretty sure I’ve had the dealer get 21 on me five, six or seven times in a row. It happens. Blackjack can be a brutal game, it’s just the way it is. It doesn’t need to be rigged, it’s already weighted towards the house.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

69 pages wheyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

aviad wrote:

Biohazard wrote:

aviad wrote:

Could you please post a link to a video showing the total doesn’t add to 100% ? Thanks

<iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/wVFBB-QE2sA?start=116&feature=oembed&#8221; width=”640″ height=”360″ frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

Adds up to 101% there.

wow this is really odd… I wonder how this is possible…

Most likely just a rounding thing. The percentages shown don’t have any decimal points, so if the percentages are…

A – 64.6%
B – 22.6%
C – 6.7%
D – 6.1%

These add up to 100%. But if we format to one decimal place (which in turn rounds the figure to the nearest whole number) we get a sum of 101%.

I’m interested to know how this works legally in relation to the “true odds” rule though. Surely this would mean that the player has a slight edge, as any rounding would have to benefit the player and not the slot, or they’re breaking the true odds display rule.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Grosvenor Casino, that I mentioned in my earlier post, are reputable. Only ever had positive customer experiences with them.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Yeah it’s a Yggdrasil game I believe. Jammin’ Jars can give out some mental wins!

Just remember, the games that can give out high X like these are normally extremely volatile and most of the time you’ll end up busto much faster than other slots.

Surprised that Queen of Riches or Starquest haven’t made the list. They’re BTG but extreme volatility. The biggest non-progressive wins out there have been recorded on Queen of Riches.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Anyone watch last night’s games? Bloody hell, they were both amazing. Close, action-packed and plenty of drama!

I’m routing for Rams, but I was a bit gutted for Saints after the ref missed the call for that foul.

Either of the #2 seeds (Rams and Patriots) winning the Superbowl was 4/1 before the matches yesterday.

[Author]

Posts