Forum

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

eejit101 wrote:

Every pick game is predetermined.

 

Blueprints just make it look… Less stylish. (They do give a 0x bonus btw. I had 2).

Who said secret of the stones is not predetermined?

Actually, not all. At least in land-based casinos in the US! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkhjZ00rsHQ&t=1080s

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

eejit101 wrote:

This one doesn’t make sense.

 

How did his account go from 3 quid slowly to 600k then to 1.7mil.

 

I don’t get it. This game can pay 7777x. 3 quid at that stake is (off the top of my head) 23k? And it’s from a sidebet so that’s not the main game either. If you bet 2 quid on your hand and 1 on the sidebar your winning 7k… not 1.7mil. The game was clearly flawed on playtech’s end here.

 

Yeah I noticed that in the story too, but I just put it down to the Daily Mail’s incompetence or miscommunication!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I like where this is going ?

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I had a run like this a few months ago, it’s the best feeling when you feel like you can’t lose! So rare though, and it soon runs out!

Nice hits bud!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

3000x is a great win! Max Megaways on White Rabbit seems to go between 2000x and 5000x, depending on how many Mad Mary’s you get (as Ligarr said above).

The most I’ve managed is three (or four? Can’t really remember as I was drunk) maxed reels, and that only went for 1300x.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Wormweed wrote:

Could you also check this for Buffalo Rising and Genie Jackpots megaways?

Genie Jackpots Megaways is predetermined, I’m sure. I won a bonus, but the game crashed before I could make a pick. Refreshed and it had already picked the bonus for me. Plus it is Blueprint, so it would make sense. Have to imagine Buffalo Rising is also.

Certain games must be random, dependent on pick, based on feedback, knowledge, sources etc. that I have, but it does feel providers are moving further and further away from this. Not sure why, as random/pre-determined should give the same outcome over x spins – they’re both random at the source. At least with the random option you feel a bit more in control.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

I know when I won a progressive jackpot (£25k), it took me ages to get my money from Ladbrokes as they were doing checks to make sure it was a genuine payout. I can see how a malfunction could happen that would result in a payout, but I feel they’d have to have some strong evidence to support this. And if it is the game that turns out to be faulty, due to poor programming or quality control, then the provider must be held accountable, rather than Betfred themselves.

Imagine if he ends up getting the full jackpot amount, what a rollercoaster of a ride that’d be for him! I must say, I do feel awfully sorry for him. Imagine seeing that win, then seeing your balance and then being told a few days later that it was a glitch and it’s been voided. Suicidal man.

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Submit a complaint with AskGamblers who will attempt to deal with your issue. They have reps from most casinos on there who will tend to get back to you within a set timeframe (mainly because it being on the site unresolved is bad reputation for them). Also email/call them every day requesting a resolution and/or escalation of your complaint.

If the money bounced back, they will have it, and they will need to find a record of it.

(I can’t post the link to AskGamblers as they are technically a rival affiliate site)

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Hm, strange to see this occurring on a blackjack game. Normally slots you get the malfunction issue. That being said, it can obviously happen on any game. I’ve certainly had some visually misleading blackjack games in the past.

A £60k settlement offer is quite significant, he’s either a very good customer there, or they really don’t want this case to go any further. Perhaps he should’ve taken the offer and signed the NDA – now he’s breached that, they certainly won’t be making another offer like that. I’d be surprised if it wasn’t proved to be a malfunction in court, but time will tell!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Biohazard wrote:

I’ve been giving this slot an absolute hammering on free play, just to check out the features and the return and such. Managed every bonus so far except for the top “One Eyed Willy’s Treasure” feature.

Just some things that I’ve noticed…

– Unless I’ve been extremely lucky, the bonus boost feature seems to land almost every single time (for me, 100% of the time over about 12 chances) – The gamble seems to be either fair or slightly favorable early on. I seem to progress to the next feature quite often, however I’ve had 4 gamble attempts for the top feature so far and every one has lost!
– It seems to love the bottom feature (Fratelli’s Hideout?) – it’s offered me this most times that I’ve hit the bonus
– I got a red flashing key for the random feature, and it paid 89x, so not sure what the actual minimum is
– Although you do get an option on the wheel for the top feature on “Inferno Free Spins”, I have read that you can trigger the top feature from every single bonus
– The “Super Gamble” (where it’s a guaranteed hit) or the bonus respin seems to come up a nice amount of the time. Perhaps around 1 in 5 gambles in my sample so far?

I’ll update once I hit the top feature!

 

Right so, quick update on this. I managed the top feature twice, and both times I got around 150x. Not spectacular, but okay!

I’m still yet to have a bonus boost feature miss, I couldn’t believe it when Bandit’s missed (sorry!!) ?

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Hi Megan,

Yep unfortunately this is normal. It’s an anti-money laundering process that casinos implement – you basically have to withdraw to a card to account for the amount deposited.

If it’s expired, you just have to request that card to be removed. They may ask for proof of this from your bank.

Once this is removed you should be able to withdraw to your new card as normal.

P.s. congrats on your huge win – going to be a nice Christmas for you! 🙂

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

The idea of playing it with one line is that, as the bonus is winspins, you’re guaranteed a line of something which pays well as you’re only playing on that one line rather than spreading your bet across ten. The flaw of this is, the bonus will still pay the same on average whether you’re playing one line or not. Playing one line on any game is basically just a hyper volatile way of playing – less frequent wins but higher paying wins when you manage to land them. It’s just down to personal preference.

I personally have had a terrible experience playing Pimped one line in the past. I think I have 40% RTP (maybe even lower) over 3,000+ spins. One line of premiums and I’m back in the game, but yeah, just found it incredibly boring and balance draining in my own experience!

Best of luck 🙂

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Oh mate I’m sure plenty of us can relate on that one! I definitely had over a thousand spins without a bonus back a few months ago on one of my first sessions on it.

It has made up for it now though with four of the top symbol showing up in the bonus, cheeky £1,000 on a £1 bet!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Welcome to the forum, Pete!

[Biohazard WANTED $675 Outlaw]

Tjay wrote:

I started playing this about a month ago. Between £5 and £10 spins. Ended up winning over £7k. My last big win was £6k from £1000 deposit. Then over 2 days i had done £5k in a matter of hours. Very dangerous game!!

Great wins bud, but ouch! I know the feeling!

I’ve not played much of Book of Ra Magic since it came out, may give it another blast in a week or two.

[Author]

Posts