blacko1974

Forum Menu

Forum Info

  • Town Status : Spectator
  • Wanted Reward: $248
  • Topics Started : 34
  • Replies Created : 559

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 559 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What Forum Members Do You Reckon You Could Beat In A Fight? #51674
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    Green2711 wrote:

    All depends where the fight took place if it was in a pub or a car park then I’d probably stand no chance against Andy or anyone else for that matter but a few places I’d have a distinct advantage would be in a kids ball pond, a low ceiling mine, a ventilation shaft or a hobbits home. As none of these places are realistic I’d probably just play the role of Mickey Goldmill if you did end up going toe to toe with Andy ?

    <iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/gQnOBAbn4Cs?feature=oembed&#8221; width=”640″ height=”480″ frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

    How could I forget about you Lad… I reckon you would be sitting in the Gents toilets trying to hit the top on Reel King, either that or you would be 3 hours in the cubicle complaining about constipation when the reality is that you were trying to bonus Bonanza,

    in reply to: Present from Wife #51406
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    andywilliams1187 wrote:

    Andy I’m starting to think your getting this bloke to pose for a photo every time I start a thread lol, always an image that answers back perfectly ???

    in reply to: No biggie really… Life goes on. #51405
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    Haz40 wrote:

    And fellow Liverpool fans Stevie. I’m sure you know we always follow Celtic.?

    FFS Haz. I can forgive the fact that you used to be a timeshare rep but a Celtic fan!!! A step too far mate  ??? You should be like big Andy W and support the Gers.

    in reply to: I’ve lost something has anyone seen it? #50339
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    You tried looking down the side of the couch lad? Thought I lost my phone earlier when the missus discovered it down behind cushions. I had a gofundme request all typed out for a replacement as well. Oh Well.

     

    1
    1
    in reply to: Phone Stolen + skint + worst day ever #50321
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    Hacko1 wrote:

    blacko1974 wrote:

    Haz40 wrote:

    blacko1974 wrote:

    I think an AGM or collection of thoughts is in need. Backinamo started as an upbeat community who could discuss/debate an array of subjects. We are now presented with a constant stream of people pleading for cash handouts.

    The Backinamo community is a generous bunch who have offered help to folk when times are tough. The problem lies in the fact that most of us are working class people who don’t have access to a reservoir of extra cash that we can offer people. We have to evaluate the forum in regards to keeping the spirit alive rather than reading posts of people asking for money. I’m going to risk a backlash but I feel most of these stories are total bullshit. I don’t want to appear as loudmouth as I know there are a lot of genuine people out there but this post has tilted me.

    Stevie I appeal once more to introduce more moderation to backinmo. I understand that the website was created in response to the YouTube banning of streamers at the time. The fact of the matter is that you are now seen as a portal where problem gambler’s can now seek help as well as a website who can offer generous joining up bonuses for new player’s

    Surely none of us can argue with that.

    Much Much Love.

     

     

     

    What get me mate is when someone comes on here with a problem. You put countless posts up trying to help and offering advice and I always say please keep us updated and they disappear forever. Would be nice sometimes to know what happened. If they solved the problem. Paid the rent or got a bed or whatever the problem may of been. That does make you feel a bit used when all you’ve tried to do is help.

    Thanks Haz lad. Think it’s all gone to shit now mate. I’m kinda done with it all now as the forum seems as if it’s in freefall with the guaranteed portion of freeloaders that appear daily. It’s a bitter pill to swallow as backinamo has some of the most generous kind hearted people that are always here to lend a guiding hand.

    I agree blacko but I also think that the community we regulars posters  have built up is fucking brilliant and it would be a shame to let the leaches spoil it.

    We all know the regular users and we gain great info and generally good gambling advice and stories.

    I’ve lost count of how many times your posts have made me smile and laugh especially between you and Andy.

    i can quite honestly say mate you are one of the foundation stones of this forum.

     

    Thanks Pal ???

    in reply to: Samsung Galaxy S6 or similar #50263
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    Anyone got a length of string to reach from Southport to Glasgow???

    1
    in reply to: Phone Stolen + skint + worst day ever #50255
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    Haz40 wrote:

    blacko1974 wrote:

    I think an AGM or collection of thoughts is in need. Backinamo started as an upbeat community who could discuss/debate an array of subjects. We are now presented with a constant stream of people pleading for cash handouts.

    The Backinamo community is a generous bunch who have offered help to folk when times are tough. The problem lies in the fact that most of us are working class people who don’t have access to a reservoir of extra cash that we can offer people. We have to evaluate the forum in regards to keeping the spirit alive rather than reading posts of people asking for money. I’m going to risk a backlash but I feel most of these stories are total bullshit. I don’t want to appear as loudmouth as I know there are a lot of genuine people out there but this post has tilted me.

    Stevie I appeal once more to introduce more moderation to backinmo. I understand that the website was created in response to the YouTube banning of streamers at the time. The fact of the matter is that you are now seen as a portal where problem gambler’s can now seek help as well as a website who can offer generous joining up bonuses for new player’s

    Surely none of us can argue with that.

    Much Much Love.

     

     

     

    What get me mate is when someone comes on here with a problem. You put countless posts up trying to help and offering advice and I always say please keep us updated and they disappear forever. Would be nice sometimes to know what happened. If they solved the problem. Paid the rent or got a bed or whatever the problem may of been. That does make you feel a bit used when all you’ve tried to do is help.

    Thanks Haz lad. Think it’s all gone to shit now mate. I’m kinda done with it all now as the forum seems as if it’s in freefall with the guaranteed portion of freeloaders that appear daily. It’s a bitter pill to swallow as backinamo has some of the most generous kind hearted people that are always here to lend a guiding hand.

    in reply to: Phone Stolen + skint + worst day ever #50214
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    I think an AGM or collection of thoughts is in need. Backinamo started as an upbeat community who could discuss/debate an array of subjects. We are now presented with a constant stream of people pleading for cash handouts.

    The Backinamo community is a generous bunch who have offered help to folk when times are tough. The problem lies in the fact that most of us are working class people who don’t have access to a reservoir of extra cash that we can offer people. We have to evaluate the forum in regards to keeping the spirit alive rather than reading posts of people asking for money. I’m going to risk a backlash but I feel most of these stories are total bullshit. I don’t want to appear as loudmouth as I know there are a lot of genuine people out there but this post has tilted me.

    Stevie I appeal once more to introduce more moderation to backinmo. I understand that the website was created in response to the YouTube banning of streamers at the time. The fact of the matter is that you are now seen as a portal where problem gambler’s can now seek help as well as a website who can offer generous joining up bonuses for new player’s

    Surely none of us can argue with that.

    Much Much Love.

     

     

     

    1
    in reply to: Phone Stolen + skint + worst day ever #50122
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    This is getting beyond belief now. Gofundme for a phone!! You can buy one from Argos for a tenner.

    7
    1
    in reply to: Stupid : Level Beast Mode #50013
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    Haz40 wrote:

    In Essex there are road signs which direct you to a secret bunker. I found that highly amusing.

    Probably Gemma Collins “sex den”.

    in reply to: Check those terms and conditions #50005
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    Reading through boring documents is one of those things in life that we try to avoid. Take your insurances policies for example!, how many of us pore over the details in the small print. We do however examine every paragraph when the policies are required. Its the same with casinos. Most of us decide to join when we have had a couple of beers, we want instant excitement with the cursor sliding towards the Danger High Voltage icon rather than the T@Cs which we should have read. You then hit the dream result and then shit yourself thinking that you may have broken a rule along the way. Having said all this we will continue to follow the same pattern.

    Take for instance the laddie who was on the forum last week, he ended up winning crazy money off a £200 deposit only to have the winnings confiscated due to a self exclusion mix up between himself and his better half.

    in reply to: Waging requirements question. #50000
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    argyl53 wrote:

    im pretty sure i heard nickslots say on a stream that calzone games will not allow u to play over £5 stakes when wagering he said it was impossible but dunno how they do this . also there is one casino redbet i think only allows £2 max on wagering

    Yeah, forgot about Redbet but they’re the only casino I’ve personally encountered which have a lower bonus stake limit than £5. Obviously always read the terms specific to whatever casino you’re on.

    Casinos can stop you playing a game with bonus money and stop you staking over a certain amount, since there is background communication with both the casino and provider every time you spin. So when you spin, the casino can reject the bet entirely on their end. I suppose if they wanted to, they could bring up some sort of overlay on your screen to tell you that you were violating their terms if you went over a certain stake with bonus funds in your account, I was just saying the actual game, which is an iframe on the provider’s side, couldn’t do it.

    In my mind i’m mentally comparing a casino account to that of an insurance policy. The devil is in the details as someone once said. Probably yourself Argyll lad LOL.

    in reply to: Waging requirements question. #49997
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    bigsteve7272 wrote:

    Hi there,

    Another thing to watch out for is the ‘conversion rate’ which so many casinos hide in their t & C’s. Some offer 100% match on your bonus, but will only allow you to take 4x your bonus amount out as winnings…..if your bonus is £50 and the conversion rate is 4x, the most you can leave with is £200, watch out for these,

    That happened to me with Nektan lad, Rhino went off it’s tits with multipliers everywhere 2 times, ended up with £2000. The second I played by wagering the balance corrected itself to £200. I had the £2000 spent in my mind lol. Bored the tits off Andy moaning about it last night and that was over a year ago.

    1
    in reply to: Anyone else struggling ATM with football betting?? #49982
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    RollWithItRuss wrote:

    Data for football markets is collected on a massive scale, the odds are not often wrong.

    most game outcomes are decided by goals in the last 10 mins of a game. That is why you are often winning a bet and it loses, hurting more than holding losing bets and late action making the outcome a winning one.

    betting on markets with three outcomes are said to be the hardest(match result)

    any form of multiple just makes it harder, hence the payoffs.

    you of course will get runs of good fortune, but these are balanced by not winning.

     

    It is confusing/irritating when your watching Jeff Sterling on a Saturday afternoon and he’s cracking bad jokes amongst his co hosts as he hasn’t any goals to report. I’m sitting there with my BTTS slips in my hand tearing my hair out at the fact that every team across the UK are unable to score a single fucking goal. There is weeks however that an entire division can be filled with each team scoring at half time.

    As the old saying goes “Your only borrowing your own money back from the bookies”

    That is completely true as your delighted when your coupon delivers but seem to forget the 3 previous Months where your betting slip inevitably hit’s the dustbin on 5pm each Saturday afternoon..

    BTW My selections for tonight were Man City, PSG and Rangers. Small prices but confident selections.

    in reply to: Waging requirements question. #49977
    blacko1974 WANTED $248
    Spectator

    argyl53 wrote:

    blacko1974 wrote:

    I think they seriously need to look into the whole wagering requirements terms and conditions, it fucking irates me when I read of a forum member who has had his winnings hoovered from him because he/she has bought a chilli bonus which in turn has broken the conditions. features such as this should flash up a warning telling the player that he will be breaching the conditions is he/she continues. Slotting is meant to be fun, you shouldn’t have to pore over T@Cs or spend hours combing through lists of played stakes shitting yourself that you have broken a rule somewhere along the way.

    Shouldn’t be too hard to implement that, should it!. It’s not as if we are asking them to break the fucking enigma code.

    Only play slots and keep the spend per spin below £5. You do that, you’ll be within the bonus terms on every major casino. It’s not really technically feasible to do something like show a warning on the game if you up the stake, since the game is hosted by the provider and they have no idea whether or not you’re using bonus money; that’s between you and the casino. The terms are the way they are because casinos still have to pay the provider their share of the player’s losses on a game, even if it was entirely casino-awarded bonus money they played with.

    As usual lad you make perfect sense, I can see now why that option isn’t feasible. I think however that the casinos have avoided paying out tasty sums of money by using this little loophole.

    1
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 559 total)