Dynamik23

Forum Menu

Forum Info

  • Town Status : Outlaw
  • Wanted Reward: $82
  • Topics Started : 21
  • Replies Created : 404

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 405 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: I wonder #92314
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    I’ve always wondered this. I know pornhub has its own live casino. Or did have at one point. Couldn’t think of anything worse though. Sticky mouse isn’t my idea of fun.

    1
    in reply to: Ayezees win on lil devil #92105
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Never seen this guy before but the fact I’ve heard his max cashout per week is 5k and he moved to Malta to play slots suggest to me as old.moon has already stated that he has certain deals in place like out good friend roshstein. Maybe eegit knows more about this specific guy?

    in reply to: Casumo Withdrawal Problems #92048
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Is this a repost? I’m sure I saw something exactly like this a few days ago.

    in reply to: Stream today? #92027
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    PsychicSnail wrote:

    Rbreen91 wrote:

    Maybe some people are blocked for some reason and can’t see it? It’s been a great stream.

    Maybe withdraw is causing hallucinations. Even the bandit says there’s no stream today on his twitter feed.

    Bruh

    in reply to: Calling for Mod #91970
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    I’ve been logging in 10-15 times a day waiting for your response, expecting something epic. Instead I find this. Shame shame shame.

    in reply to: Ayezees win on lil devil #91921
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Beautifully dramatic hand shaking aswell.

    in reply to: Bonus rules #91902
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Also double and triple check bonus terms. Specifically if bonus funds and cash are separate, what the max bets are and if there is any max win with bonus funds. These  are more than likely the biggest reason people break T&C. If a casino has a max win with bonus funds please don’t play on the site, it’s a disgrace that such terms are even allowed.

    1
    1
    in reply to: Losing 15 hands in a row in blackjack #91901
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    It’s 50/50. You either win or you lose. In all seriousness the chances of it happening is irrelevant as cards don’t remmeber what has happened in past events. If you had said what’s the odds the next 15 hands I play I lose then we could work out the maths dependant on how you play blackjack and under what rule set and give you the odds. Asking for odds after the fact is moot. Like xbob said if you carry on playing for an infinite amount of time you will 100% win 15 in a row. If you played a infinite amount of time at some point you would win and lose 100 in a row. It’s just really hard for people to fathom such a unlikely event which is why so many people go busto doing the martingale strategy.

    in reply to: Community Stream! #91669
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Followed. Hopefully will catch a stream soon.

    in reply to: £7000 win 32red #91489
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw
    in reply to: £7000 win 32red #91487
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Rbreen91 wrote:

    Dynamik23 wrote:

    Imo I would pay back any debt I have. I’ve never had a loan, went into my overdraft or borrowed money I couldn’t pay back the very same day from friends and family. However if a law exists like this then you can’t blame someone for using it. People seem riled up about him suggesting to use a loophole for not paying back debt but these massive companies are doing the exact same thing in regards to taxes and debts, so why shouldn’t the little man at the bottom be allowed to do the same thing.

    This prick’s advice to someone who got other people to borrow money for him (which was ridiculously stupid in the first place) was to fuck the people who borrowed money for him off, and don’t pay them a penny, and let other people deal with his mistakes. This is the main reason why people think the guy’s a piece of shit cunt.

    Ah fair enough. Obviously have missed something somewhere. From first glance it seems like people were pissed at him for not paying back a loan company and using an obscure law to facilitate that.

    in reply to: £7000 win 32red #91450
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Imo I would pay back any debt I have. I’ve never had a loan, went into my overdraft or borrowed money I couldn’t pay back the very same day from friends and family. However if a law exists like this then you can’t blame someone for using it. People seem riled up about him suggesting to use a loophole for not paying back debt but these massive companies are doing the exact same thing in regards to taxes and debts, so why shouldn’t the little man at the bottom be allowed to do the same thing.

    in reply to: Bandit’s hit on Lil Devil #90908
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    EnglishGuy wrote:

    Because its kind of logical to believe it.

    Lets say we know that lil devil will give a 30.000 RTP return ,, once every 10 million spins.

    If you spin once.. you are in 1/10,000,000

    If you spin 5 million times, you are 50/50 to hit.

    It’s correct to say this. but also, not guarenteed.. the guy spinning once, could still hit it.

     

     

    I still think this logic is wrong. In your example it’s still 10million-1 when you spin for the 5 millionth time.

    in reply to: My theory regarding Reel King #90812
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    I’m sure I posted it a previous thread but it’s for sure just evening out. He showed his RTP on one site at over 100% and I said short term this is very easy but long term no matter what he does it will slowly drop and the longer he plays it the closer he gets to the RTP. The only way he can stay ahead on that game now is to stop playing it.

    in reply to: Verification #90776
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    This a is regular thing in live casinos now due to ECDD. Some of the biggest players are Chinese students who are given thousands from rich parents who don’t know the cost of living in the UK. However since these enhanced checks casinos need to find out source of wealth for the player but when they say “my parents send me the money” the casinos must by law ask to see their parents source of wealth. Best option as stated above is close the account and open two new accounts at two different casinos and do 50% on each.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 405 total)