Forum

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Would like to know aswell.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

i used to deal to a player that played both red and black on the 00 wheel they had. Unlike single 0 you don’t get half your bet back so we could literally never win but would always lose if zero or double zero hit. He said he just wanted his money to last. Lol

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Just Basics wrote:

Casinos and providers yet again passing the buck and making people wait so they forget or say fuck it.

Id love to hear a story of how a casino or provider immediately compensated a regular customer. But to this day I’ve not.

Hope u get it sorted mate.

 

Happened to me on William hill on this mariachi game. (Forgot the name) they even gave me £10 for inconvenience. Then casumo on knights life aswell. It’s one of them things when something bad happens people are quick to complain but when it’s the other way around people are unlikely to say anything.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

I’m in

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

27th September 3:23pm

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Biohazard wrote:

@Dynamik23

My point is, you’ve fixated on one small line of my initial post which was only there to bolster the debate for Monopoly Live anyway. By my passing roulette comment, all I meant was, that in certain situations with certain dealers on certain wheels that they are theoretically able to land certain sections more often than others. On that basis, given the simplicity of the Monopoly Live wheel compared with the complexity of a roulette wheel, it is surely more than possible for sections to be targeted if they so choose. I have never once stated that croupiers in all casinos everywhere on all wheels are able to land specific numbers or sections whenever they please. It was a passing comment, and I didn’t intend for that to move the focus from Monopoly Live. Perhaps I should have been more clear!

You then added a small input to the Monopoly Live debate by stating they do what they do for game pace. I have never questioned why they spin how they spin – this whole thread is about how the way that they run the game is acceptable within regulation.

Anyone that knows me on here knows that I don’t need any convincing around how most casinos operate and whether it is lawful or not.

Fair enough. For me is doesn’t read like that. Seemed like you were stating a incorrect fact about croupiers being able to spin sections. My bad. I’ve never seen monopoly live tbh I am just assuming the reasons.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

eejit101 wrote:

yeah, we are talking about monopoly live. The game isnt the same as roulette. YOu probbaly can spin a section in that game, or close to it

I know you are talking about monopoly live. I stated my opinion on that but also gave some information on a misconception that he stated in his first post. I don’t know if you are being sarcastic as I don’t see you as someone who believes croupiers can spin sections. If you do then read my 2 posts above. I also have some maths based facts that I believe prove nobody can spin sections or numbers on roulette.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Your first post stated that some dealers can spins sections and some.can spin numbers. I was refuting  that statement. I also added something to the thread in regards to the title. I know it’s a few days late but haven’t been on here for a little while. So don’t think I missed the point. Did I?

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Last thing to add that I forgot is something that only casino workers will know. It’s an old school way of thinking but dealers are actively told to vary their spins, ie stand on one leg, increase wheel speed or revolutions and spin from a different number that the last winning one. Old school casino workers believe that it makes things more random. Which is ludicrous. So now not only do dealers have to be perfectly accurate they must do all these things or actively show they are doing these things and still spin a section. It’s literally not possible. If a dealer isn’t varying spins they will be taken off the table depending on who is at the table. And dealers also get audits where some of these things are criteria to pass.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Biohazard wrote:

Hi all, probably a bit of a surprising thread from me, given my reputation around here as a ‘casino defender’, but here we go!

I’ve been playing a lot of Monopoly Live since its release. The RTP isn’t the best (2 and 10 aren’t terrible at ~96%, but rolls are pretty poor at ~93%), but I find it really fun to play, and in most sessions I’ve played I’ve managed to breakeven or profit on it.

Now, the question I’ve been asking myself over and over (and I did actually ask it in another thread a few weeks back but never got a response), is how this game can be regulated and accepted by the UKGC given its current set-up? My gripe with it is, it seems like the only requirement of the hosts is for the wheel to do at least one full rotation. My concern with that is, many hosts utilise awfully slow spins, and from the moment they release the wheel it is obvious what section is not going to land.

So, if they wanted to avoid four rolls, a very prominent, single strip on the wheel, let’s say, they surely quite easily can do this? I’m genuinely surprised that regulation hasn’t ensured the protection of the players by insisting on two or more rotations at the very least. It’s very different to roulette, where there are plenty more variables that make it very difficult for the croupier to land in a specific number or area. Even then, there are experienced croupier’s who are able to land in a certain section of the wheel more consistently than what should be possible. So what does this say about Monopoly Live?

Now, by no means am I claiming anything is rigged. I’m not even saying that the hosts for Monopoly Live are necessarily utilising such a biased method of play. I’m just calling it out that it appears to be possible, and quite easily so at that.

Thoughts?

No dealers can accurately land in sections. Like you say too many variables. Including the diamonds, the wheel moving and the metal divits. You do know that everything changes a spin? Sweat on the finger tips, humidity, wheel speed, wheel balance, erosion of inner wheel where the ball spins. Nobody in the world can accurately and knowingly spin a section of  specific numbers. Let alone a single number. Most spins are 20 revolution minimum. So you are saying that a person can throw a little plastic ball the length of the wheel 20 times using only their middle or index finger? Literally 1 finger. I really don’t understand how anybody can even believe that this is a possibility. Take away the diamonds, have big divots for the numbers, the wheel completely stopped and let the dealer do the minimum revolutions required (5) then ask them to spin a specific section of say 12 numbers (3rd of the wheel) then I might believe someone could get to the point of being able to hit it slightly more than 33% over thousands of spins but I would still say it’s not possible. I can honestly say the best way to prove to yourself that it’s not possible is to do it. Learn to spin, try and purposefully hit a section of 12 numbers and do 10 spins a day for a year. I’ll bet every penny I have that you will hit that section near exact percentage of what the maths says it should. In regards to the monopoly so I am on topic. I think that’s it’s all about gamepace. Game pace is what ultimately makes the casino money. The more rounds or spins of hands of whatever game means more house edge is being applied to your money which is the long run means more profits. Quite simple in my mind.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Yeah if seedy can sort out the emails it would be fantastic. Problem is I have no contact with the executors as they have cut off contact with me. So tbh I have very little information except my nans name and address.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Still haven’t got your email address. I just want to be certain that it will become public record. My nans house is worth £300000 minimum so I would expect probate to be needed. My issue is that the executors have said during the wake that they would like to buy my nans house. I don’t know how it all works but I truly believe if there is a way for them to purchase it at a really low.price they will. The reason why the executors have denied us access to the will is because they believe me and my siblings are going to contest the will. Concerning in itself as we haven’t said anything of the sort to them and we haven’t seen the will. So the only questions I have at the minute is, is there anyway for an estate worth £400000 (estimate) to not go through probate/not become public record? If my nan stated in her will that she does not want it to go through probate does that have to happen? Sorry for the long post.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Can I get your email? The will still hasn’t become public record. I’ve looked online to find out if a will must go through probate and what I found is giving me some cause for concern. From my understanding there is a way for a will to not go through probate which then means it doesn’t have to become public record. Am I correct on this? Using the government website people who have died after my nan have had their wills become public record so im seriously worried that the executors have lied about the will going through probate. We have zero trust in them as they were only my nans neighbours and they are both husband and wife and have said they are beneficiary’s aswell. In addition they have  lied about family jewellery and given rings worth tens of thousands away to their own family already so need some advice on what I should do next, considering I have no information at all.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Bonus hunts are fun. A occasional low stakes video so the average person can truly engage with the sums being won and lost. Maybe a session where you can only give a slot 100 spins and you must move on and keep track of what games bonus within 100 spins and which one pays the most. Ask the forum to guess on something within the video and do a little giveaway to closest guess. Loads of ideas for things. Trying to get people more engaged on the forum would be a good idea.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Rbreen91 wrote:

I don’t perceive the word that way in most cases. If we were having a debate about autism, I could agree. We aren’t though.

Fair enough. I’m only saying he might have a mental health issue, he may very well not. But when he is actively saying he needed a break and his head is gonna explode etc etc just don’t try and stir the pot. Just my 2 cents and last post about it. ?

[Author]

Posts