Forum

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

MaskWearer wrote:

Xbobmad wrote:

Maybe his bankroll is much bigger than yours? Maybe he’s playing with gambling profit? Maybe he won the lottery? It’s disappointing that people immediately go to asking if a streamer is funded by a casino

Do you sleep at night after being this much of a shill?

PROOF has been posted of Chip. The reason Chip isn’t phased by dropping £5 or 10 or £50k is because he didn’t lose it. The casino is paying him per video and he deposits that exact amount often with a bonus. Chip isn’t even gambling which explains why he ain’t bothered. It’s Kylie Jenner with zero social worth but buy this make-up that will save you 30 seconds from your filtering and photoshop

You can look at the economics and understand how it’s fake. Dudes like Chip are averaging > £1K per day. I’m assuming even the shills here can do the math of how much per year. One must consider at those levels the 40% tax and NI, so to lose £1K per day you need a genuine £1,000,000 per year salary, minus tax. Not even in this crazy world will someone pay chip £1 million, so no, clearly he is not playing with his own money. Goes from crying over 60p to playing £40 spins without giving a fuck and people even question if this is real? LOL

The world would be a better place without Chip on YouTube/Twitch trying to deceive people into clicking his links to earn Pokemon cards. Someone needs to hogtie that little bitch and shove those Pokemon cards down his throat

Don’t talk dirty you’ll get me riled up. I would drag my balls through a mile of glass to have you hogtie me and shove Pokémon cards down my throat while you call me chipmonkz.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

So from my understanding SENSE is land based exclusions from casinos. There is nothing to do with banning from specific casinos. Unless they have changed it in the last 6 months. I understand your point, but you can just self exclude at specific casinos if you wanted back then. You are never gonna be released early, they have a responsibility to you and are obligated by law. Once your self exclusion ends with GameStop my suggestion is to ban yourself from as many casinos as possible and open a poker stars account. On pokerstars you can block yourself from the specific sections. Be it casino, poker or sportbook. So on pokerstars you won’t be able to play any casino games if you ban yourself from them.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

I actually love this idea. Like you say little to no extra cost. Doesn’t even need to be a regular thing. Couple times a month. Gambling stories are always interesting and just learning more about people who you watch is interesting. Definitely think you should give this a go. People on the forum could asks loads of questions so you could have a list of things to talk about with your first guest.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

MaskWearer wrote:

@Seyahkram1977 – IDK who you are but you come across as a massive shill and a desperate and annoying one at that

Here’s the thing about stake and why it matters:

G A M B L I N G

We are here to see GAMBLING. The higher the stake the more gambling is taking place, the more interesting it is and the more people watch it

You can have your grannies meeting, consult with the shills and the casinos, but the FACT IS the number of views and the entertainment of the viewer is directly correlated with the stake, and you lot are full of shit. You can’t argue with numbers and how the world works

I wondered why this site was so dead and I guess I have my answer. The regular posters are highly objectionable people

Talking, “billy big bollocks”, for playing at an affordable stake for the average employed person in the UK. Just STFU and if you are that poor I will repeat – STOP PLAYING SLOTS AND SORT YOUR LIFE OUT – just wow. Bunch of shills and addicts on 20p stake because they can’t pull themselves away from slot machines. Pathetic.

Whoa Billy big bollocks don’t get your knickers in a twist. On this forum we don’t actually tolerate fetishes for grannys.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Smokingbeagle wrote:

Wow just wow obviously your mask wearing needs changing into a gimp mask.

I think your missing the point of the post .

hitting a massive X win is super rare in any game .I was asking an opinion of the other respectable forum members what approach would they do given a chance to try hit one on specific games .

however if you want to watch videos of youtubers play at £100 stake go watch Roshtien and wank one off into a tissue then go fuck off to his forum and moan instead.

also apologies for swearing.

Hahahahahha. That gave me a good chuckle.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Smokingbeagle wrote:

So I’m currently on Gambian etc and not gambled online in quite a while obviously the boredom is hitting hard like I’m sure it is with lots of you .

however the itch to gamble has come back and I’m finding it so hard to resist at moment .

found myself googling sites not in Gamban before snapping out of it .

kinda glad I didn’t because they look shite

<span style=”font-size: 1rem;”>anyone else feeling the itch…..</span>

 

Well done for not giving into it. I know it isn’t the same but there are some free to play sites that have all the games. If you get the feeling, load one up and you’ll soon not have that urge to gamble. It’s what I do when I want a gamble but cba to lose money. 10 mins in and the gambling itch has gone.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Pdavidson88 wrote:

I really don’t understand the whole fuss around stakes to be fair..

At the end of the day the stake is all relative..

Its still a certain x win..

You land a 100 x bonus. Its still 100 x that stake.

I don’t get why people egg people/streamers to go high all the time.

Its not like you get rewarded any differently if you play on a different stake (unless it’s like a higher % bonus chance but the wins are still the same)

Don’t speak sense. You’ll confuse someone.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

MaskWearer wrote:

The majority of real-life slots don’t go down as low as 20p so why does everyone want 20p bets? NOBODY WANTS TO WATCH SOMEONE PLAY SLOTS ON TWENTY-FECKIN-PENCE

why not just play yourself at 20p and if you can’t afford 20p stakes, stop playing slots and sort your life out

With £1000 I would be minimum £2 stake or 500x the starting balance. I usually start with 300x the stake which is enough to get a bonus even on Bonanza or Red Tigers, the majority of the time anyway. Then I hope the bonus pays 200-300x or more and I’m in profit.

Do you think you will hit 1000x wins or 111,111x on DOA2? Not gonna happen it’s so rare to get anything above even 500x. I do see the logic of playing games with weak basegames (like DOA) on lower stakes. Doesn’t matter what stake though you will lose your entire roll before you get a wildline or 5 scatters on san quentin

£2 minimum stake on games with fun bonuses that regularly pay 100-1000x. There’s very few games that regularly give bonuses more than 1000x. When those games don’t give those big wins they are utter gash like watching paint dry. DOA is worst game ever apart from wildlines

Whoa Billy big bollocks. Instead of wasting your money on high roller slots how about you help improve the world. We all can’t be as rich as you.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Psychicsnail hit the nail on the head for me. Responsible gambling isn’t just how much you can afford to lose. You can still play irresponsible and afford to lose the money. It’s clear the £500 deposits are gonna bleed doing £1-£2 spins. Then to go do big spins on money box or reel king is never gonna help in the long run. I’m in the camp who would prefer to see the 20-60p videos, or doing a deposit bonus and trying to beat wagering if need be. If people don’t like it then they won’t watch and that’s fine. Bandit has already said the channel isn’t making enough money so why not reduce stakes dramatically to get longer play time retain maybe 80% of viewers, get new ones who don’t watch bandit because of his high stakes. The channel could become profitable if he did this but I don’t see it happening anytime soon.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Imho I don’t think the UKGC should allow casinos in the UK to choose the lower RTP versions. Firstly because it’s an absolute con. More importantly though, it’s not transparent. Majority of players won’t know that some games and some providers have multiple RTP games. So how can that be adhering to responsible gambling? I would argue that someone who could choose between 96% and 94% to then choose 94% is a irresponsible gambler. Casinos should make it very clear that they choose to use the lower RTP settings so players can make an informed choice.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

I’m sorry I completely disagree with these takes. I agree some “auditors” are wind up and there to try and cause as much hassle as possible. However there are some out there that just want to express their freedom of photography. My uncle is a police man in London. He says that it’s good people like this do it. Police should and need to be audited by the public. Many police out there that act 100% profession and within the law but the ones that don’t need to be educated. Photography isn’t a crime. It’s that simple.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

£23.23

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Geordiemark42 wrote:

That made no sense to me lol? I thought it a bonus does not save it will just credit you what the bonus would of paid?. But are you saying that basically I have to reach the top of lil devil in 24 hours or the hearts will vanish every time?. If yes then the game should be banned. And what about wild swarm?

Na he misunderstood you. It has been know to bug out and heart get losted. But it sounds like them taking away autos has reset the hearts. Contact them but don’t think you will get anything tbh.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

If it wasnt double chance then they would not have been able to licence the game. Both casino and game provider would get fucked so hard, especially in the UK. People trying to test it will never be able to accurately do so. They would need to test playing millions and millions of spins to get a big enough sample where variance isn’t playing a part.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

GameRoom wrote:

Dynamik23 wrote:

Very nice. Hold the line. Don’t sell. Looking more likely Phillip Morris is going to settle for potentially upwards of 20bn. When that happens $1 is easily in sight.

waiting to see what is going to happen to XRP I am still holding

Same here. I think they win Vs the SEC or the SEC drop the suit. When that happens price is gonna go through the roof.

[Author]

Posts