Forum

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Geordiemark42 wrote:

Only joined to do the bandit draws but put £20 on Thursday. Won £60 withdrew £20?????. Got back to £80 went to withdraw £40 to find I had a £4.55 fee so just played it away. Come back with a email requesting my driving license photo to get the £20. Sent it off only to now have account suspended until I send some unreal shit. The worst is a photo of me holding my driving license in one had and a big bit of paper with today’s date on in the other??. I live alone. We are under lockdown and I have two fucking hands. How the fuck do I take the photo of this?. This is all wrong and should be stopped. Any security checks should be done b4 first deposit not when you want your winnings. I bet it would be quicker and simpler if there had not had your money yet. Another site I will just close down because the stuff they want so I can have £20 back is a fucking piss take.

Wow. Sorry to hear this. I know it’s only £20 but it’s still the principal of the matter. Seriously hope bandit helps out with this. Don’t think he can justify being an affiliate for a company that tries withhold people’s money.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

I would stop. I think that relax gaming makes games specifically for bonus buys. If you look at the majority of their games, they are impossible to bonus. Have near no base game potential and the bonus once you get it can still be 10x. Its also a boring as fuck bonus.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

theruffler wrote:

##dont read if you haven’t watched yesterday’s video##

…

Would love to know what everybody else thinks, Bandit especially, but does anyone think Reel King has been changed or updated?

Bandit has been hugely successful over the past couple of years on this game and I’ve followed all of the threads on this. My concern is that the last 6 months or so Bandit has been given an absolute kicking on it, even by his standards!

Bandit, if you’re reading this, I’d be interested to know if your off stream experience has changed at all. With all gambling there are dry spells but to go from winning 10s of k a month to being hammered every time seems strange.

It was and will continue to be inevitable. It’s just his RTP on this exact game getting closer and closer to the actual RTP of the game. The more he plays the closer it will get. At some point in time (if he carries on playing it) he will be at exactly where he is supposed to be on the game.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

I thought it had a 50000x max win?

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

So I had this with Paddy power. I could bonus buy so I did. I got an email recently saying they had made a mistake and any losing funds had been returned. I lost 5p in total. Not saying they would do the same but if that can be confirmed then you can play without the worry of losing money.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

The old Chinese in the casinos who smash the top symbol during a bonus. Once saw one of them put their hand through the machine because they were bashing it so hard. 90% of older Chinese players do it.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Nice hit, especially for free. This is ban list for me. I spend over the course of 3 sessions 500x to get ONE bonus. Which proceeded to pay 3x. I love pragmatic but I think it’s a shitter version of doghouse. Doghouse megaways is my favourite game ATM by far. Got decent potential in both bonuses but can deal out huge wins in base. Rather spend my money on that than WWG.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

groundiskey wrote:

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Dynamik23 wrote:

You should play for fun. Profit is a bonus. Stop once you aren’t having fun anymore.

Can’t break it down any simpler…

PROFIT and STOP!

So what happens when you are never in profit? Keep going until you are? I understand the logic but let’s say you deposit £100. Balance reaches £101, you stop. Is that fun? My original view stands. Play for fun and once you aren’t having fun, stop.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

You should play for fun. Profit is a bonus. Stop once you aren’t having fun anymore.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

PMDX wrote:

Hey guys hope all is well.

Just wanted to make everyone aware of an experience I had with casper games. I must stress it’s not entirely their fault. I probably should of read the Ts and Cs properly.

Anyway, I had free spins bonus where I won £16. Somehow I managed to get this to over £300. I managed to get through their massive 65x wagering which took hours. My balance which was still somehow £300+ then shot down to £28.

 

After speaking with their support they pointed me to a part of the Ts and Cs which state bonus funds will only convert to cash relative to your lifetime deposits. So yep I only put in £28 to that point.

To say I was gutted is an understatement as that would of come in real handy about now.

 

Again I’m not blaming them as its there if you read it but just be careful .

Yeah it’s your fault but it’s still bullshit, this is what should be illegal. These type of terms should not be allowed. I assume they aren’t regulated but if they somehow are, GC needs to come down hard on these terms. Don’t worry about quick spins just sort out these blatantly conjob terms.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

100% a real site. You may even have an admiral in your town centre that you didn’t even know about. Slot only casinos. However if wins weren’t being added to balance then that could be a fault or a display issue. Speak to customer service and they can check back through every spin if needed.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

CasinoGod wrote:

Someone has reached out who codes websites for a living and  said this, it pretty much confirms what we have been thinking.

If you look on his website, none of the Casinos in this brand, “Spinz”, “Winston Bet”, “Awsome Spins” or “Jungle Spins” have affiliate tracking ID’s in the URL.  Have a look.

Home Page

<iframe class=”wp-embedded-content” style=”position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);” title=”“Home Page” — Chipmonk Slotz” src=”https://chipmonkzslots.com/embed#?secret=5CVp24NHX0&#8243; width=”600″ height=”338″ frameborder=”0″ marginwidth=”0″ marginheight=”0″ scrolling=”no” sandbox=”allow-scripts” data-secret=”5CVp24NHX0″></iframe>

This is what every URL will look like, each link has a code on it

This is what Winston, Spinz, Jungle, Awsome look like:

He is not tracking the visits to these casinos, so that means he does not get paid for  sign ups to them. Why would he do that?

Because he’s on the fixed fee / deposit cover per video. There is no reason why he would be promoting Casinos that he cannot get affiliate earnings from so this means he must be getting paid some other way.

None of THOSE dodgy ones he gets the fixed fee per video have this tracking. Have a look…

So why? Why could he possibly send traffic to that casinos for free without his affiliate ID? Because  he’s getting paid outside the normal scope for them.

 

I have no idea how to verify this stuff, I’m useless on computers. Chip has stated that he doesn’t get paid a fee per video. Of course he could be lying but it could be the truth aswell. Have you checked other people’s sites  like Craig and Jimbos to compare? We know for sure they are affiliates who get some sort of money from losses from their players. Now chip has said he doesn’t get paid a fee I’m.more inclined to believe him as its better for him to just stay silent, now if he is lying he will get more.shit and if he is telling the truth the ones who just hate him are gonna hate him more. If he doesn’t get paid per video or get % of his players losses the only other thing is maybe a monthly contract. So is employed by the casinos. Whether this is even a thing, I don’t know? In my opinion, if he is just getting affiliation money and is using that to gamble then it’s all good. Like others have mentioned if it’s a fee per video or my suggestion of a monthly fee/wage then I’m on the fence. It doesn’t really show the true nature of gambling which in turn doesn’t promote responsible gambling. Also I would like a answer on how multiple.people can play on one account. This clearly breaks TOS so I don’t like that fact it’s one rule for one and one rule for another. Any chance this question can be answered by you chip?

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

James1888 wrote:

Yeah, I know. The main point of the thread is your obsession with Chip. Anyway, doesn’t matter, its not important. What I’m having for lunch is way more important….

Have a good one. Hope you save us all from the tyrant called Chip.

Got no obsession with chip, if the thread was about Gabriel slots or about nick slots or about any of the Curacao site streamers or about bandit himself. I would have the same stance. My obsession is with responsible gambling. All I care about is that content creators are not exploiting vulnerable people or children. My main beef is with casinos who do this, but this is then extended to content creators who promote said sites.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

James1888 wrote:

ATTENTION  ALL.

It has not been confirmed Chipmonkz is (partially) using Fake Money.

Keep up the good work Chip. I enjoy your content cos I enjoy slots. I have absolutely no interest in your affiliation deals and can’t believe people invest so much time obsessing about it.

Keep streaming, keep winning and people will keep watching.

Apologies about the positive post everyone. Guess I better say something nasty or I’ll be removed from this forum. Chip – stop playing Goonies, it’s shite!

If you had read the thread the main points aren’t about his affiliation deals.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

chipmonkz wrote:

Hi just wanted to jump in and clarify this for you.

My pokemon channel is a separate entity in itself and has 0 links to my gambling channel.

The only way you would be offered a video about gambling is if you as a viewer already watch gambling content.

Youtubes algorithm does not know i have a second channel as they are not linked in any way.

Most viewers on my pokemon channel are my age believe it or not as most big collectors are older.

My intention is not to garner people to watch my gambling content its merely a hobby for me that i enjoy a lot and wanted to share as the pokemon community is very big.

I dont have an angle to do anything other than have fun with the second channel.

Hope this clears it up for you Cheers

I assume your YouTube channel has your real name attached to it? I also assume your Pokémon channel has that same name attached. I don’t know exactly how recommendations work, but I have been recommended second channels of people i watch where their second channel content is completely different to anything I have watched. It’s not your fault but as long as you do you best to keep everything seperate then it’s on YouTube to not promote gambling to under 18s. I may have missed it but don’t think I did, can you answer the question about how multiple people can play on one account? But if we as regular players did this we would be banned? Also saying no would lead us to believe that you do have some sort of deal per video or something going on. If you didn’t have any deals at all then you could say no as you wouldn’t have a NDA in place. I don’t even care if you are paid to make videos or they cover a percentage of your losses or whatever it maybe. However it needs to be disclosed. I don’t believe the casino is right in blocking you from revealing the information, in effect it does not promote responsible gambling. You getting paid let’s say £100 to make 1 video, plus unlimited matched bonuses plus a percentage of players losses plus maybe a percentage of your overall losses returned, it slowly puts the house edge close to 100%. If not over 100%. Of course the slot machines edge won’t change but theoretically with everything else involved you could technically be a profitable slot player, which does not promote the real side of gambling. It gives a false insight into gambling. I feel like the ukgc is going to come down harder on things like this so in the future your hand maybe forced. Again I have no ill will towards you and I hope you do well but I know the realities of gambling addiction and gambling content has only been around for a short time on YouTube and twitch so I don’t think the regulations are as tight as they should be in protecting young and vulnerable people from gambling. Thanks for answering the questions in the first place. You had no obligation to do so.

[Author]

Posts