Dynamik23

Forum Menu

Forum Info

  • Town Status : Outlaw
  • Wanted Reward: $82
  • Topics Started : 21
  • Replies Created : 405

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 406 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Proof of sharp practice? #101217
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    GaryBannister60 wrote:

    We all know that certain sites have ridiculous lengthy “processing” times for withdrawals. I had many an argument with 32red, Paddy Power, Corals about how a withdrawal to PayPal could take 12 hours+ when sites like Videoslots could do it within 5 minutes. I got responses, hilariously in 32red’s case, like “it is down to UK banking hours”. What, I replied, you get Joe the intern to queue at the bank to send out the withdrawals?

    We all know the real reason, surely, was that the longer it was “pending” the more the withdrawal would be reversed by the frustrated punter.

    Now, lo and behold, this morning I withdraw from Coral to Paypal and it is in within 30 minutes. The first time I withdrew after reversing withdrawals was banned. The quickest previously was about 6 hours+.with them. Amazing!

    I wish there was some legal mind that could have a go at this like PPI or whatever. They should recompense every single reversed withdrawal. I know it’s the punter’s folly (so was PPI, payday loans etc) but the fact is this was encouraging irresponsible gambling.

    What I don’t get that with casinos you are guaranteed to make profit like almost nowhere else. You’ve got your pound of flesh so why did you seek even more?!

    I kinda agree with this. I think it’s impossible for people to get their money back years down the line when it inevitably becomes illegal. I do believe that reversing withdrawals will become illegal soon. There is literally no positive to being allowed to do it.

    in reply to: eye of horus normal 10 line game #101120
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    I don’t know if you can get 5 symbols, but you aren’t being ott. These companies have a responsibility to protect people. If true then it is false advertising and they need to be made aware.

    in reply to: Crazy Time Went Mental #100963
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Also to add, that sandy is a high roller regular. I’ve seen her place 80k on 1 and 50k on 2 and win. So 250k win is a decent hit but only takes 3 spins losing 80k and it’s not that great anymore.

    in reply to: Crazy Time Went Mental #100962
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Pretty sure that is the total that all players won. I believe max win is 500k anyways.

    in reply to: Star fuckin eh? What ? Don’t get it ….. #100872
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    One of the worst games I’ve played. Got two bonuses both paid under 10x including the trigger. What I hate is you can have 100 wilds scattered around the place but it can still find a way to miss. Nothing pisses me off more than that. Maybe honey rush getting to 19 and 39 to the build up stage.

    in reply to: Casumo finally f*^ked me over :( #100777
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Biohazard wrote:

    GameRoom wrote:

    best casinos to play

    Useful table this, but I’m not sure on the accuracy, unless things have changed in the last week or two. I played at Casumo just a couple of weeks back and I specifically checked a couple of Play N Go slots in their help files and they were reading >96%+ RTP?

    In addition, Rizk has always been higher RTP for me in the past, but I’ve not played there since March so perhaps that has changed too…

    Really good table but not sure it’s accurate either. Played rizk and every PNG game used higher RTP.

    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Rbreen91 wrote:

    I’m glad your bet didn’t go through. I wouldn’t have been able to see a grown man have a melt down otherwise.

    Haha legend.

    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Smokingbeagle wrote:

    Dynamik23 wrote:

    Link the proof please. If what you are saying is the truth I can’t see how you can’t make a complaint to the gambling commission. Let’s keep the numbers simple. IF you had £10 and bet £10 and your balance showed £10 but then as it landed in a number it rejected the bet and the reason given was 1p was saved for the booster thing then firstly your balance should state £9.99  and secondly it’s completely illegal and I believe you have a good claim (with all appropriate proof) for your money and potential winnings back for that spin. If you have proof Vs said “yeah we kept 1p back but still displayed £10 and allowed the bet to be placed” However if the reason was “malfunction” you will still have a good reason to complain for the fact your balance was incorrectly being shown but you won’t get any money that you could have won. In regards to the other shit I don’t really understand what you are spouting about. Show all the proof you have and then me and others can see the full story more clearly.

    Errrrrr how can you blame bandit for his affiliation with video slots to your bet not being taken . that’s like saying I’m fat because I drove past McDonald’s and the my friend said Big Macs are good .

    BTW I am fat and bandit did mention big Mac’s ????

    Errrrrr wrong person? Didn’t mention bandit once.

    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Link the proof please. If what you are saying is the truth I can’t see how you can’t make a complaint to the gambling commission. Let’s keep the numbers simple. IF you had £10 and bet £10 and your balance showed £10 but then as it landed in a number it rejected the bet and the reason given was 1p was saved for the booster thing then firstly your balance should state £9.99  and secondly it’s completely illegal and I believe you have a good claim (with all appropriate proof) for your money and potential winnings back for that spin. If you have proof Vs said “yeah we kept 1p back but still displayed £10 and allowed the bet to be placed” However if the reason was “malfunction” you will still have a good reason to complain for the fact your balance was incorrectly being shown but you won’t get any money that you could have won. In regards to the other shit I don’t really understand what you are spouting about. Show all the proof you have and then me and others can see the full story more clearly.

    1
    in reply to: Bye Bye VS #100546
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    mega wrote:

    Its not just video slots, a few casinos are doing this, just check and legacy of dead on playojo is 94.51% whilst the likes of betfair have it at 96.58%. i need to check risk out, never held an acc there

     

    Below are the sites I have accounts with and checked for lower RTP. There will be more.

    BETVICTOR

    KASSU

    Casino casino

    Casoola

    YAKO

    OJO

    Videoslots

    in reply to: Bye Bye VS #100521
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Lifeslots wrote:

    So after playing for a while on VS without much luck overall I decided to check out some RTP’s against Rizk.

    Wow, what a shock the first 2 I looked at Dragon Tribe and Book was not just slightly lower but:

    Tribe 94.41 on VS, Rizk 96.07

    Book 94.25 on VS, Risk 96.21.

    We all know that overall we will loose but being 2% + disadvantaged every spin. They can go fuck themselves, account closed !!

    This is what I’m saying. 2% is fucking huge. Do you believe that it’s responsible for a casino to choose these RTP slots and not make it abundantly clear to every single player that this is what they have chosen to do? Imo, how can a player make a responsible gambling choice if they don’t know that game providers make slots with multiple RTPs and casinos can choose which ones they want. The RTP boils my piss because I gambled on sites that choose these lower RTP slots because I just didn’t know that variable RTP for the same game existed until it was spoke about on this forum. So for years I’ve been giving an extra 2%+ to the casinos inturn reducing my overall gametime and enjoyment. /Endrant ? I’ve actually spoke to UKGC because I do believe it could be in direct conflict of Responsible Gambling.

    in reply to: I did not read the T&C’s but that’s not my fault! #100362
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Scrolling through Twitter and I saw bandit say @seedy was wrong about the 0.5% thing being your own money. Then I watched his unlisted video while watching some enthralling pacman. Seems like bandit maybe doesn’t know that it’s actually part of your winnings and not a rakeback kind of scheme. It’s all bloody confusing imo. Don’t like VS due to the RTP thing but I understood why people played as they do have the weekend booster and they do have the wheel spin things but I feel like now the weekend booster is imo a pile of wank then what does it have going for it? I admit the layout and ease of use was something I liked but can’t think of much else that I couldnt get at another casino with higher RTP. Please inform me if I’m wrong on bandits knowledge of the 0.5% thing.

    in reply to: I did not read the T&C’s but that’s not my fault! #100363
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Fuck sake made a post but was signed out. Sorry @seedy.

    in reply to: RIZK casino #100342
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    Malkychamp wrote:

    Result!! Rizk are pretty reputable so should be all good ?

    Decent site. Ranking up the levels you get the free wheel spins which is always going to give you free spins but cash prizes are on it. We had 10 free on BOD bonused and it went for 387x haha. Better than the standard 2x.

    in reply to: RIZK casino #100341
    Dynamik23 WANTED $82
    Outlaw

    GameRoom wrote:

    check pay&go new games on rizk they start using lower RTP,ye bonus on rizk is very bad

    Yeah I check every casino and most games I play now. So far no game has a lower RTP but I will continuously check as there is no law for them to tell players that they have changed so could conceivably change within a day.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 406 total)