Forum

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

I don’t know if you can get 5 symbols, but you aren’t being ott. These companies have a responsibility to protect people. If true then it is false advertising and they need to be made aware.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Also to add, that sandy is a high roller regular. I’ve seen her place 80k on 1 and 50k on 2 and win. So 250k win is a decent hit but only takes 3 spins losing 80k and it’s not that great anymore.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Pretty sure that is the total that all players won. I believe max win is 500k anyways.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

One of the worst games I’ve played. Got two bonuses both paid under 10x including the trigger. What I hate is you can have 100 wilds scattered around the place but it can still find a way to miss. Nothing pisses me off more than that. Maybe honey rush getting to 19 and 39 to the build up stage.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Biohazard wrote:

GameRoom wrote:

best casinos to play

Useful table this, but I’m not sure on the accuracy, unless things have changed in the last week or two. I played at Casumo just a couple of weeks back and I specifically checked a couple of Play N Go slots in their help files and they were reading >96%+ RTP?

In addition, Rizk has always been higher RTP for me in the past, but I’ve not played there since March so perhaps that has changed too…

Really good table but not sure it’s accurate either. Played rizk and every PNG game used higher RTP.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Rbreen91 wrote:

I’m glad your bet didn’t go through. I wouldn’t have been able to see a grown man have a melt down otherwise.

Haha legend.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Smokingbeagle wrote:

Dynamik23 wrote:

Link the proof please. If what you are saying is the truth I can’t see how you can’t make a complaint to the gambling commission. Let’s keep the numbers simple. IF you had £10 and bet £10 and your balance showed £10 but then as it landed in a number it rejected the bet and the reason given was 1p was saved for the booster thing then firstly your balance should state £9.99  and secondly it’s completely illegal and I believe you have a good claim (with all appropriate proof) for your money and potential winnings back for that spin. If you have proof Vs said “yeah we kept 1p back but still displayed £10 and allowed the bet to be placed” However if the reason was “malfunction” you will still have a good reason to complain for the fact your balance was incorrectly being shown but you won’t get any money that you could have won. In regards to the other shit I don’t really understand what you are spouting about. Show all the proof you have and then me and others can see the full story more clearly.

Errrrrr how can you blame bandit for his affiliation with video slots to your bet not being taken . that’s like saying I’m fat because I drove past McDonald’s and the my friend said Big Macs are good .

BTW I am fat and bandit did mention big Mac’s

Errrrrr wrong person? Didn’t mention bandit once.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Link the proof please. If what you are saying is the truth I can’t see how you can’t make a complaint to the gambling commission. Let’s keep the numbers simple. IF you had £10 and bet £10 and your balance showed £10 but then as it landed in a number it rejected the bet and the reason given was 1p was saved for the booster thing then firstly your balance should state £9.99  and secondly it’s completely illegal and I believe you have a good claim (with all appropriate proof) for your money and potential winnings back for that spin. If you have proof Vs said “yeah we kept 1p back but still displayed £10 and allowed the bet to be placed” However if the reason was “malfunction” you will still have a good reason to complain for the fact your balance was incorrectly being shown but you won’t get any money that you could have won. In regards to the other shit I don’t really understand what you are spouting about. Show all the proof you have and then me and others can see the full story more clearly.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

mega wrote:

Its not just video slots, a few casinos are doing this, just check and legacy of dead on playojo is 94.51% whilst the likes of betfair have it at 96.58%. i need to check risk out, never held an acc there

 

Below are the sites I have accounts with and checked for lower RTP. There will be more.

BETVICTOR

KASSU

Casino casino

Casoola

YAKO

OJO

Videoslots

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Lifeslots wrote:

So after playing for a while on VS without much luck overall I decided to check out some RTP’s against Rizk.

Wow, what a shock the first 2 I looked at Dragon Tribe and Book was not just slightly lower but:

Tribe 94.41 on VS, Rizk 96.07

Book 94.25 on VS, Risk 96.21.

We all know that overall we will loose but being 2% + disadvantaged every spin. They can go fuck themselves, account closed !!

This is what I’m saying. 2% is fucking huge. Do you believe that it’s responsible for a casino to choose these RTP slots and not make it abundantly clear to every single player that this is what they have chosen to do? Imo, how can a player make a responsible gambling choice if they don’t know that game providers make slots with multiple RTPs and casinos can choose which ones they want. The RTP boils my piss because I gambled on sites that choose these lower RTP slots because I just didn’t know that variable RTP for the same game existed until it was spoke about on this forum. So for years I’ve been giving an extra 2%+ to the casinos inturn reducing my overall gametime and enjoyment. /Endrant ? I’ve actually spoke to UKGC because I do believe it could be in direct conflict of Responsible Gambling.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Scrolling through Twitter and I saw bandit say @seedy was wrong about the 0.5% thing being your own money. Then I watched his unlisted video while watching some enthralling pacman. Seems like bandit maybe doesn’t know that it’s actually part of your winnings and not a rakeback kind of scheme. It’s all bloody confusing imo. Don’t like VS due to the RTP thing but I understood why people played as they do have the weekend booster and they do have the wheel spin things but I feel like now the weekend booster is imo a pile of wank then what does it have going for it? I admit the layout and ease of use was something I liked but can’t think of much else that I couldnt get at another casino with higher RTP. Please inform me if I’m wrong on bandits knowledge of the 0.5% thing.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Fuck sake made a post but was signed out. Sorry @seedy.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Malkychamp wrote:

Result!! Rizk are pretty reputable so should be all good

Decent site. Ranking up the levels you get the free wheel spins which is always going to give you free spins but cash prizes are on it. We had 10 free on BOD bonused and it went for 387x haha. Better than the standard 2x.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

GameRoom wrote:

check pay&go new games on rizk they start using lower RTP,ye bonus on rizk is very bad

Yeah I check every casino and most games I play now. So far no game has a lower RTP but I will continuously check as there is no law for them to tell players that they have changed so could conceivably change within a day.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Ended up cashing out £600 no problem. So despite thinking the worst they didn’t decline the withdrawal.

[Author]

Posts