Forum Menu
Forum Info
- Town Status : Outlaw
- Wanted Reward: $312
- Topics Started : 29
- Replies Created : 1092
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I dont get the hatred of games if one of the first 3 bonuses dont pay thousands of pounds on a 50p stake. The whole point is volatility. You play the lottery 3 times and then dont win 1mil so never play again? No, its about the chance of it.
The games need to have bad bonuses so they can have good bonuses.
I work in gaming, but as you can see – I dont care for their methods.
Realistically £2 isn’t a low stake though. A low stake is 10p-20p-40p that kind of range. A video of new games would be good, but people will always like Donuts.
I don’t understand this obsession with donuts. As a non-gambling observer I think it’s boring and never damn well pays from what I’ve seen. Shite graphics, terrible concept, poorly executed and about as inspiring as a dead frog.
Have to disagree here. The maths behind this game is very clever. The concept is quite good. Sure it can be a bitch to pay but it goes over 5,000x
I agree he should play some new ones, there are some great games around at the moment.
Honey Rush doing well
Tower Tumble great game bad graphics.
slot of madness is great but a dick to bonus
Mighty Dragon is back from gamomat.
Honey honey honey from prag isnt tooo bad.
Oddly my new favourite game this week is from Pariplay, who suck usually, but “The good the bad and the wild” is a damn good game.
Alsot he new Yggdrasils – Liliths inferno and Sahara nights are great.
Who is upset? Im pointing out the facts from my life, work, and career. One which is use to push for fairer treatment of players and better regulation.
As the brilliant argyl said, what is your source of these Facts you are claiming please? I did a BBC entire search for any news with the word “gambling” in, and have read….
1 – MPs asked for a limit similar to £2 max stake online. The goverment and the betting council will never approve this as it literally pushes anyone who would contribute to the economy to an offshore site. So that wont happen. Ever.
2 – Uk gambling shares year on year down 4-12%. Well yeah… you cut off the bookmakers FOBT and this will happen. The fact it is this low a drop shows the stregnth of online.
3 – Proposed ban on credit cards online. This is support and hope comes in ASAP.
This was hysterical from the MP who pushed it – “We do not see the justification for having slot machine style games online with staking levels above £2. If they are not acceptable in land-based venues they should not be allowed online.”
Umm… i can think of 45 justifications. Wealth, income, profitablity, capacity, fun etc. If checks and SOW are done then people can do what they want in my opinion. I am not sorry for anyone who earns 50k a year and blows it online. Thats their choice. They can get help, they have the NHS now with courses. Its a risky thing to say, especially here, but control is the same for all people on all things. Addiction is bad, but its our own fault.
Also the MP who said it is wrong; you can stake more than £2 in many land based venues. These venues are called “casinos” and they’ve been around longer than FOBTs have been in high street bookmakers.
hahaha. Nice! only a fiver though.
I banned myself from GIG sites for their shady practices with source of wealth and responsible gaming. So i dont know yet 😀
Who is upset? Im pointing out the facts from my life, work, and career. One which is use to push for fairer treatment of players and better regulation.
As the brilliant argyl said, what is your source of these Facts you are claiming please? I did a BBC entire search for any news with the word “gambling” in, and have read….
1 – MPs asked for a limit similar to £2 max stake online. The goverment and the betting council will never approve this as it literally pushes anyone who would contribute to the economy to an offshore site. So that wont happen. Ever.
2 – Uk gambling shares year on year down 4-12%. Well yeah… you cut off the bookmakers FOBT and this will happen. The fact it is this low a drop shows the stregnth of online.
3 – Proposed ban on credit cards online. This is support and hope comes in ASAP.
This was hysterical from the MP who pushed it – “We do not see the justification for having slot machine style games online with staking levels above £2. If they are not acceptable in land-based venues they should not be allowed online.”
Umm… i can think of 45 justifications. Wealth, income, profitablity, capacity, fun etc. If checks and SOW are done then people can do what they want in my opinion. I am not sorry for anyone who earns 50k a year and blows it online. Thats their choice. They can get help, they have the NHS now with courses. Its a risky thing to say, especially here, but control is the same for all people on all things. Addiction is bad, but its our own fault.
its fucking hard. I struggle and i get tips ffs. Sometimes they dont work out, sometimes they do. Its a profitable thing to follow… but you need to find how to work leverage. Watch some youtube videos on it.
Buy shares on Plus500 in Aurora Canabis. Their Q1 results coming soon and will be +230% Year vs Year. Will jump 20%.
I enjoyed the part where eejit gets told that he knows nothing about his own industry by some random fruitloop. I reckon trr mainlines aluminium into his skull. Saves a tinfoil hat.
Sometimes he is right 😀 Had no idea what Vera and John was the other day.
You after a job eejit putting your cv on the forum ????
haha, seems like it. Was more a case of stating why he should listen. If he now refuses to listen – fuck him. If he decides that maybe i might be right on some topics, great! Im equal opportunities me 😀
I don’t know why you think you can tell anybody wondering when a ban is coming that you are qualified to assure them that there won’t be one. You work in a Casino… so what. Fact is that even the Casinos owners might be left in the dark, never mind the people they employ.
1. I didn’t say they did. However, i do believe the people that made the decision did so based on what they could see. That was streamers content.
2.The UKGC will not ban streamers. They are not performing a harmful act. ……… You say that, but the people trying to get gambling being advertised by any means banned will disagree. They are literally going to make the valid point that gambling streams is gambling advertising. The only real reason they exist is so that the Casinos can get business. A bit like advertising on TV before 9pm. Soon it will be unheard of.
3.You are wrong. Starting from donkeys ago youtube have been removing videos due to advertising and links. Due to the fact people are making money by getting other Adults over 18 to sign up to Casinos. Everybody knows that. I agree there is also the issue of certain music, language and so on that will get a video pulled down… but the main issue is advertising gambling and providing links to sign up (for a special deal). All gambling, including online Poker. Nobody could have predicted black Friday. Not the same to be said concerning slots or other forms of none skill related gambling.
4. I actually knew most of that.
5. I don’t need to work in gambling to predict the future of Affiliation markets concerning gambling. I don’t know why you seem to think because you work for a Casino that you can assure millions of people that the UK GOVERNMENT are going to be unable to stop the 24 hours per day affiliation links and advertising of gambling. They already are- and will continue to do so!! In fact, to the point where affiliation and advertising of Casinos to people OVER 18 will NOT be allowed at all. Common sense really. As much as that might upset people, that is fact. The UK Government stopped big Tobacco, do you think they can’t stop big Casinos? The UKGC are nothing really, they literally only rake in millions for the Government. When the Government tell them to, the UKGC will be the people advertising the end of Affiliation by any tom DICK or harry with a fckn internet connection. It is one ugly as fck business to be in “when considering ” the pain caused OR THAT CAN BE CAUSED by any cunt with an internet connection that spammed the fck out of somebody’s email account causing a serious addiction. It can’t be compared to porn, tobacco or alcohol and drugs. It is totally a league of it’s own and any wanker out to harm others to make a quick buck can get involved. NOT FOR LONG, TAKE MY WORD FOR IT.
6. You are wrong. Just because you work for a Casino doesn’t actually mean you know the ugly truth. Unless the Bandit quit his job and started gambling for a living in the last 6 months, i don’t even understand how you think that is a reasonable excuse.
I’m not coming back to comment any further. There is too many people here that will be offended by the truth or try and come up with excuse after excuse. They will claim to know what they are talking about because they work for a Casino. Pretty sure the actual Bookmakers thought they knew where they stood with the UK Government until they had to be forced to reduce the stakes on FOBT’S. Lol, the Casinos thought the war wasn’t big enough to force a 2 pound max stake and now thousands have lost jobs, shops were shut and continue to close UK wide.
WHY DO YOU THINK THEY REFUSED TO LOWER THE STAKES ON FOBT’S TO A TENNER MAX BET? IT WAS BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T KNOW WHAT THEY WERE UP AGAINST.
Just wanna say a bit about this.
I dont “work in a casino“. I am the head of sales/AM, and head of the entire White Label business unit we have. We build casinos. We manage casino platforms. We aggregate gaming content (Games, sportsbook, live casino). To do this we have several licences, and we have to know everything, every hoop, every legality, in order to perform these tasks. I also have full knowledge of gaming content, how it works, RGS’s, remote/cloud and hosting. So out of every single person you haven spoken to online about this, id honestly say you dont get much better to speak to and listen to than me. Unless you personally know someone who works with the UKGC, MGA, and Curacao, and also does bingo. As bingo we dont do.
Or you can google some random persons feedback. Who will just quote you nonsense as its their opinion.
Casino owners do indeed not know alot. They sit back and do… well nothing. They pay others to manage it. Like me.
Quickly summarising…
1 – Still not true. I am fully aware of the reasons why. Streamer = not one of them.
2 – Some streamers stream for fun. It wont die. Again, i cant prove this, but there is no current action, process, or plan in place, or even in discussion, to ban the medium of streaming.
3 – Well many people predicted Black Friday. but thats not the point. Just go to any 2+2 post in 2007 and see for yourself about the legality of it. And im not wrong. But have your own opinion its ok. Im not forcing you to believe me, im giving you actual facts.
4 – Glad you know. So why post the opposite? Confusing, but ok!
5 – Take your word for affilaition being banned in the end? Umm. No. Take my word for it it wont. Now you get the decision of do we believe you, who has no industry knowledge, job connected, affiliation deal, or dealings with any of the regulatory bodies around the world. Or me, who does all the above. Affiliation will exist for all forms of purchasing forever. Until something better comes around. what might be banned if cookie chasing. Which is dodgy as hell.
6 – I am head of the department of a huge group that deals with EXACTLY THIS. We get notifications, courses, MGA/UKGC whoever the hell else telling us exactly the needs for each document and each parameter that is set. This is the definition of insanity from you at this point. I work literally in this exact field and market. Today I had a 2 hour meeting quite literally about licencing, player protection and technological changes to collect KYC/AML/SOW faster for easier player journeys. Why argue your utterly wrong opinion on this one? Drives me mad! Its like having the belief that the pilot of a plane flies upside down the whole journey. He knows he doesnt. The passengers dont. The ground people dont. But you believe they do so people should listen?
You baffle me sir.
Without the bandit I reckon Jimbo would be a lost soul. When he published his website with Craig I at least thought he would of changed it around to make it his own. But its a clear clone of the Bandits. If I were him I would be majorly pissed off.
This is the funniest thing I’ve read in ages. It’s like tesco not reducing the price of their Bread because Asda already did it. Or what about play-tech copying evolution gaming? (QUANTUM ROULETTE, COUGH COUGH). All is fair in business. The Bandit doesn’t own the Internet or the gambling industry, so i guess it’s only fair that they can do what they want.
Give me a game provider and i can list what they copy. Whether its maths, aesthetics, design, bonus rounds etc. The list is huge
Jesus, its hit Malta too for MGA players. Time for me to make a linkedin debacle out of them i think.
For those who dont know me there, i regularly slate our industry and those trying to domiante it by shady practices. Just find me there if you want to support the cause. Im all for players rights, but with fair responsibility by the casino. Casino profits are very small currently, but sneaking this in is not the way to do it.
-
AuthorPosts