Liberty

Forum Menu

Forum Info

  • Town Status : Outlaw
  • Wanted Reward: $132
  • Topics Started : 4
  • Replies Created : 273

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 274 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fat Santa. #26447
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    I’ve been playing it for play money and after about 40-50 bonus buys got the fatty to 4×4 for 850odd x stake. I’m up on it in play money ?

    in reply to: Extra Chilli kills me #25259
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    Extra chilli is the devil lol. The gamble feature is just plain awful as well. Yes on the rare occasion you’ll do really well out of it but you were simply better off playing roulette 99.9999% of the time.

    £100 feature with 16 spins involves a 50/50 gamble and a 60/40 gamble. Bet red then first and second 1/3rd on roulette and you’ll have £300. Most 16 spin features pay way less than that. It’s gambling crack. All the way to the top would pay nearly £700 on a starting £100 on roulette and yeah sure you have the booby prize of 8 or 12 spins but both are almost always a big pile of poop and 24 spins is often also poop.

     

    I’m sure you an argue with my theory and I’m not suggesting you should go to roulette instead, simply pointing out that the game is a terrible one to get into. It causes massive tilt, almost always pays less than an equivalent roulette gamble and while it has huge potential it really should simply be illegal. All the stuff about £2 stake on fobt makes me chuckle when a game like extra chilli exists. Heh.

    1
    1
    in reply to: Disappointed by a GOOD bonus on low stake? #23539
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    I’ve had 1000x bonuses on both buffalo rising and genie jackpot megaways on 10p and I was annoyed at both lol. Started with £10 both times tho to be fair and with the genie jackpots one I took the £100 to solar discs and did £2.50 spins and hit a 3 disc bonus that paid £600.

    I rarely play micro stakes, I was just trying both those games out to see what they are like so as I’ve only had 1000x bonuses 3x having two of them at 10p is annoying. Couldn’t one of them been on 5 lions when I hit a bonus on £5? Nope it paid £80 haha.

    in reply to: Back on YouTube with a little Saturday night viewing… #22931
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    Nice one bandit! Glad you decided to get out of bed so I could watch that haha. Much better than reading about it.

    in reply to: Bring back the happy bandit #22499
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    You can’t always be happy lol.. When slots are playing like that it’s certainly irritating.

    I will say again, bandit mate – play whatever stakes you want to play and whatever slots you want to play just always record every session for us haha. I prefer the high stake videos as they are incredibly exciting but I watched the 60p stuff and had a laugh. Regardless if you told me when I next wanted a session that I had to do £40 spins on reel King I’d tell you to f off. It’s my money and I’ll do what I want to do with it  I’ll play what I want to play.

    I really think that it’s ridiculous that people think they can tell anyone else what to do with their own money but hey we are living in very strange times.

    Play whatever you want and change the stakes if you feel you need to..to whatever you want. Look at it like this mate, your videos get thousands of watches and yet maybe 10 people cry about the stakes. You can’t please everyone and really shouldn’t try to otherwise you will end up bowing to the angry shouty minority.

    Peace.

    Tl;dr – your money, do with it as you please.

    1
    in reply to: Forum Members DEFENDING CASINO’S WTF? #22468
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    Are you talking about me Kingpab? ?

    in reply to: Forum Members DEFENDING CASINO’S WTF? #22291
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    Exactly as bandit says. With William Hill I had a kyc issue, sent documents and they didn’t get back to me for a week. Went to live chat and they said they needed a picture of me holding my drivers license in one hand and my debit card in the other lol.. Its not an easy photo to take on your own. What’s next? A picture of your wife’s underwear draw? You in your birthday suit?

    If it’s possible to send in the documents before they ask you for them  and it is in a lot of places, I’d recommend doing so.

    in reply to: Forum Members DEFENDING CASINO’S WTF? #22250
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    eejit101 wrote:

    I assume I’m one of those people so I’ll answer clearly for you.

     

    1 – Casinos require verification when you first deposit. This is done via automated address checking on your info, tied to your DOB and bank card matching through 3DS security.

     

    2 – once you deposit over the threshold amount you are asked for further docs (passport or driving lic) and proof of payment. Some casinos ask for this up front. For the UK I believe the amount was 1.4k before docs are 100% required but that may have changed. NOTE – this depends on the licence the casino you play on operates under. If you are under UKGC or MGA (advised!) The rules are stricter than Gibraltar or Curacao or isle of man.

     

    3 – if you withdraw before reaching those limits you HAVE to provide documents. Called KYC. These are required by payment law for money laundering checks. It’s only active on withdrawals or balance transfers, not small deposits.

     

    I hope that helps you. Any questions just ask. Or fuck it, add me on Skype. I’ll even show you how a casino works, stop the mad conspiracies at times.

    3 is incorrect..I’ve withdrawn from casinos in the last month that haven’t asked for any ID.

    My experience was with nektan, I have signed up to 5 or 6 of their casinos in the last month and have withdrawn from all of them .this most recent time they’ve asked for documents for my withdrawal. It’s not the largest one I’ve done either.

    =====

    I sympathise with you basics. I’ll try to explain my opinion on why some casinos leave your money sat there for days or request documents not before you can deposit but when you try to withdraw.

    They know that people are addicts and can’t control themselves.

    Personally I find casinos to be pretty disgusting in general but hey I’m an addict so I use them on occasion. I’ve lost withdrawls by reversing them “ill just play with a couple of hundred, it’s fine, it’s all winnings anyway” a couple of hours later it’s all gone.

    Their business model is to take money from people who gamble. People who gamble make bad decisions, for one they gamble! Lol.

    As such at some (but not all) casinos it’s designed to be as easy as possible to deposit money but as annoying as possible to withdraw it. I can’t understand why anyone would defend this practice either.

    In the case of my latest experience with this practice not only have they told me it’ll be 3 days to check my documents but have also offered me a 50% deposit bonus up to £500 haha.

    Where you and I disagree is that Casinos and slots don’t need to be secretly rigged to make people lose, they are already legally rigged to make you lose and as I say above, some casinos design the cashout process so that your average gambler will reverse and lose their winnings. That’s is after all their whole point of existence.

     

    Imho casinos should force you to go through kyc before you can deposit and key terms on bonuses should be highlighted like this-

    £5 max stake

    X times max win

    40x wagering (insert actual wagering amount here)

    There’s no reason they can’t do these things other than it’ll hurt their bottom line. They know if they did youd just gamble somewhere else you are already signed up to because when you want to gamble you want to gamble. You don’t want to wait 2-3 days until you can gamble..they know this and they exploit it

    Peace.

    in reply to: Latest Video. #21931
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    I prefer the higher stake videos personally. £2-£5 is more relatable to me anyhow lol. The high roller videos are incredible, taking me somewhere I’d never go but as I said in another post – play what you want and are comfortable with and just record every session you do lol.

    in reply to: The doors were blown off right here. #21832
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    Oh, it should be noted that if you feel you need to take a break then that’s a great idea, I’m not saying don’t you dare stop making videos!! Haha. I’m just saying that if you are going to have a little session then record it, I honestly don’t feel like you need to hit a magic number of minutes to have created decent content. Look how much of a buzz this short video has created.

    If you feel like it needs to be X minutes long and you don’t hit it just add it to the next session you do.

    Just a suggestion.

    in reply to: The doors were blown off right here. #21831
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    Congrats bandit you jammy bastard! Personally I’m conflicted here, in the one hand I don’t find reel king that interesting to watch  on the other hand I’d rather watch you play reel King than watch absolutely nothing haha. Plus hitting the top is exciting but the rest is very meh.

    However, honestly, I’d rather see a video of every time you go on a reel king /hive etc than not see you play anything for weeks on end and I’m sure that everyone feels the same. Why not just record all your gambling sessions, just put all the short ones together as a compilation mate. I watch you because of your personality and you are very funny. The slots you play are secondary to that. I’m sure it’s the same for most of your following.

    I know it would be a bit of a ball ache to create a vid everytime you have a bit of a sess but 99% of people would love to have more content from you even if it is you playing the same games. Cheers and all the best.

    in reply to: Casino myths – Proven and busted #21023
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    This link provides more information about the case you are hyping up .

     

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2012/07/31/pokerstars-will-pay-547-million-to-settle-u-s-government-charges-and-buy-full-tilt-poker/

    <span style=”font-size: 1rem;”> I’ll let you read it and have your say on it and then either agree or disagree with what you have to say as you’ve stated this by claiming its all rather secret hush hush but the information is actually there to read.</span>

    I think the issue is how you go about using Google. If you are trying to prove something sinister is happening Google will provide you with sinister hyped up links as it’s basically an echo chamber. If you want to use it correctly try to prove to yourself that pokerstars is legit and then using logic and critical thinking evaluate that information against what you currently know. That way you’ll have a far better understanding of what you are talking about… Just a suggestion.

    Peace.

    in reply to: Casino myths – Proven and busted #21022
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    Yeah there certainly might have been some dodgy dealings done by their original owners (the Scheinberg family) the early days of online poker were a bit wild but I have no evidence that they were. I haven’t read the court documents or the findings or indeed anything except for the headline you have just posted, I’ll look it up and get back to you with some context regarding what it actually involved ..Amaya bought them back in 2014, a Canadian company who have since changed their name to the Stars Group.

    As far as I’m concerned the rng as of today is clean. I think that people feel its not because of 3 reasons.

    1) they overvalue their hands and don’t understand variance..its entirely possible to lose with Aces vs deuces every time  just highly unlikely.

    2)people remember the bad beats more than the obvious wins, as a result of this they won’t see a fair number of the deuces they beat as people who do fold them and they won’t remember the all ins they win because its expected  All that remains are the losses which will happen 1 in every 5 times they face up against an under pair and when you take into account that there are 12 under pairs to aces you’ll be up against them quite frequently.

    3) online in an hr playing a cash game and a multi tournament at the same time you see more hands than you would in a casino in a day. As a result of that you see more bad beats every day that you remember (see point 2) and start to think it’s unstable.

     

     

    Finally there is certainly an argument to be made that the rng might be more action based than you would encounter with a dealer shuffling and its impossible to accurately recreated a shuffle and deal  HOWEVER its the same for all players and that’s effectively what matters. I’ve certainly seen hotseats when playing live and online.

    in reply to: Casino myths – Proven and busted #21015
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    Lol… You actually can’t read

    This is an excerpt from the link I posted.

    Try again –

    Rational Services Ltd’s Random Number Generator (RNG) has successfully been tested to generally-accepted industry standards for highly-regulated jurisdictions by Gaming Laboratories International (GLI)

     

    By gli…. Its been, for the 4th time, certified by gli. Not by rational services… You silly silly man. Feel free to apologise at any point as this is the final one of your points that you just can’t seem to read coherently. After that kid, you’ve got nothing other than wah I lost when I shouldn’t and it makes me sad but you keep up the good fight haha. Its making my day but please please please, actually read the coherent, fact based replies I make instead of just keyboard warrior replies. Tah.

    in reply to: Casino myths – Proven and busted #21011
    Liberty WANTED $132
    Outlaw

    I might have to rescind that Good on you for being able to read comment. I had already answered you regarding their rng software in the previous comment where I took the time to go through each of your 7 questions and answer them. I also clearly stated that 70% of online poker players are losers. You say you aren’t in that group then say you’ve lost 100k online haha . (hint – you are in that group) you’re also in the complete losing group as you’ve not won more than 100k live you are just a loser at poker period. Perhaps you just got lucky live? Who knows, I wasn’t there.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 274 total)