Mr B

Forum Menu

Forum Info

  • Town Status : Blocked
  • Wanted Reward: $395
  • Topics Started : 125
  • Replies Created : 778

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 780 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rbreen, come here. #61756
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Rbreen91 wrote:

    Why bring it into this? Do we need to know that you’ve just had an anxiety attack? Nope.

    I felt like saying it. Do you need to know… I think you can survive without knowing. Now go back to what I said in my previous reply, if you can do it.

    in reply to: Rbreen, come here. #61752
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Rbreen91 wrote:

    Hahahahaha. Fucking tops. You’ve just made this to start shit and now “I’ve just had an anxiety attack.”

     

    this is exactly the attention seeking shit you get called out for.

     

    And your passive aggressive bullshit should stop too.

     

    If anyone actually feels sorry for you, they’re pretty fucking gullible.

    What if I did just have an anxiety attack and what if I am not looking for pity ? Let’s see if you can think outside of your petty agenda.

    in reply to: New Site Names #61749
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    how about thegamblingindustrywantstoownthissite.com ?

    in reply to: Sorry Bandit you crossed the line for me #61748
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Yes Bio and you completely left out half of the proposed solution invalidating your opinion entirely.

    They could pay the money back and the industry could 100% ban them.

    How this would happen, intrinsically I don’t know but it really doesn’t seem like rocket science to me. As I said, they can DNA test the hell out of people online to the extent they could indeed sell a persons whole identity. It can’t be that hard to do it industry wide including stores too.

    A 100% ban virtual and physical.

    in reply to: Rbreen, come here. #61747
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    whoswho wrote:

    Mr B is an attention whore. That’s just my opinion I hope He gets the help he needs underneath it all he seems decent

    I wonder if the insult helped.

    in reply to: Rbreen, come here. #61743
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Winningbird wrote:

    Mr B, as much as I don’t agree with rbreen calling you that, the forum and new threads isn’t the place to sort this. It’s a gambling forum, not counselling and arguing.

    Hope you’re ok

    I’m ok WB, sadly, rbreen is trolling people on the boards and anyone who has an opinion s/he doesn’t like, s/he insults them. I’m actually in the middle of an anxiety attack after some stuff that just happened at my house which was nothing to do with me. I have no idea why rbreen thinks the way they act is acceptable. Running into a thread of a member they don’t know and stating “found the wanker” is of course against the rules along with other not playing nice types of behaviour.

    I also have no idea why rebreen acts this way or thinks it is helpful but rbreen isn’t giving up so I felt this thread was necessary. And at that point someone just walked in and told me about three children dead in a bombing.

    I don’t want to know why rbreen is acting this way. I do know the forum member didnt deserve it and I know others have suffered it too.

    They think this is a game.

    in reply to: Sorry Bandit you crossed the line for me #61720
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Rbreen91 wrote:

    i like that Mr. B, because that’s what I’m saying, isn’t it? I’m saying to abuse people when they’re ready to jump off a bridge. ? I like how you twist things, you’d be good at it if you weren’t such a fucking idiot.

    The point made was that your contribution was absolutely (that means 100%) no use to this debate. Ever heard the saying “tilting at windmills” ? google it. It’s similar to “pissing in the wind”. That’s your contribution to this whole thread. 100% pointless.

    nothing twisted about my sarcastic reply to your useless reply. but I keep forgetting you think you are talking to a fucking idiot.

    shall I reduce myself to your level ? yes or no.

    in reply to: Abusive forum members Vs Bandits rule. #61718
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Eightblack wrote:

    Mr B wrote:

    Eightblack wrote:

    Mr B wrote:

    So let it be known that bandits rules are irrelevant, (some of) the regulars are in charge and if they see fit, can abuse anyone they wish.

    That’s that sorted then. You won’t hear another word from me on the matter.

    Well I’m glad we won’t hear another word from you on the subject as your stance is the definition of hypocrisy.. The rules are play nice. Not every body take shit from Mr B but don’t give it back because he doesn’t like it.

    Why is it, when i am ready to bow out of a debate, someone has to bait me back in again ?

    How’s the panic attacks and anxiety coming along eightblack ? I supposed I should say I really don’t give a shit but I’m not that cunt.

    Hardly relevant but since you asked they’re manageable, thanks for your concern but as you’ve previously stated I too don’t think an individuals mental health is something sound to dig at.. But I guess you are that type of cunt eh

    I guess seeing as you are never wrong, I must be. There’s a valid reason I mentioned them but if you took your head out of your arse and had a good look, you’d see why. Peace

    in reply to: Sorry Bandit you crossed the line for me #61715
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Haz, you can trash all you want, it doesn’t make you any more right than I might be. You know where we’d be with that give up mentality right ? You keep doing this.. trying to prove a point by using phrases such as “the bottom line”. Did you not see me use the word advocate ? I already know the bottom line. I clearly stated they don’t give a fuck. MVD agreed.

    The next move isn’t give up. The next move is to keep on keeping on. To move nay sayers and doubters out of the way.

    Those who wish to advocate real positive change have always been the bottom line. Not those who hold the reigns and treat people like slaves or such.

    in reply to: Sorry Bandit you crossed the line for me #61708
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Rbreen91 wrote:

    If you gamble your kids food money away, you’re a fucking cunt, that’s how it is.

    and there it is….. the genius of working solutions.

    Hey gambling industry, next time there’s a gambling related suicide risk and police are trying to stop the jumper from leaping to his or her death, get them to shout “YER A CUNT”.

    geez, can someone have a word with rbreen.

    in reply to: Sorry Bandit you crossed the line for me #61705
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Haz40 wrote:

    Bottom line is though yes they can do more. Will they do more. No. Staff at the bookies were meant to refuse problem gamblers on fobts if they felt they had lost too much in a session. Have i ever seen anyone been refused. No.

    Which is why I have been trying to advocate these debates. While I have the strength I will always want to find a way to support those who can’t support themselves. While these scum companies ignore the trail of damage in their profitable wake, we have to challenge them to clean up and do it properly.

    Which is why I find “when the fun stops” a bare faced insult.  For starters……

    in reply to: Sorry Bandit you crossed the line for me #61701
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Like I said bud, if they can DNA test to the point of wanting passport selfies and colossal bank statements with proof of income over a period of months then surely they can have an independent service (as an industry) that could verify if a player has just ruined his or her life and left three children with no food.  They could pay the money back and the industry could 100% ban them. If you have to DNA test to walk in a virtual casino, you should have to DNA test to walk in a bookies so staff know exactly who is who and who is suffering vs who is able to tolerate or control their gambling desires.

    Again, I’m not saying this is what they should or would be expected to do but they are preaching safe gambling and taking absolutely fucking huge profits in ruining lives, smashing up families and people dying as a DIRECT result of profiting from the addiction they are FORCED to say they don’t like so why not call all of them out on it.

    The average drug dealer doesn’t care who their crack kills or lives & families it ruins. In the grand scheme, I can’t see a difference on the suffering side.

    Counselling is a gamble in that it may not work. insulting them doesn’t help either (no pun at you). There seem to be some people who think that because they claim they can control themselves, they have a right to insult those who don’t. These people shouldn’t be allowed a voice on these matters while they think so crookedly.

    in reply to: Sorry Bandit you crossed the line for me #61689
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Mickeyvondickey wrote:

    Maybe I’m getting the wrong end of the stick here and I’m not defending them as many are shady as fuck, but why should casinos do more than they already are?

    Put it in to context in other industries:

    Do the firms Jack Daniels, Smirnoff and Guinness have to take responsibility for the countless lives and families lives’ that alcoholism is accountable for ruining each year?

    Same with the tobacco industry and same with the fast food industry.

    @Mr B – I’ve heard you mention that casinos dont give a fuck about the lives they ruin and I 100% agree with you. 

    The question I have for you is:

    In an ideal world, what should they do that they are currently not doing? What would be your wishlist if you had the power to change the industry regs at the click of your fingers?

     

    Before my mom passed away, I got married and as much as we budgeted our wedding, on three separate occasions we realised we hadn’t accounted for certain things. I guess this is somewhat normal when it comes to budgeting.. I mean, look at the scottish parliament construction thing. So I reached out to mom for help. I was excluded so no spinning was going on. We were putting every spare penny in that we could and it was looking great until we sat to do the books, three times. Anyway… mom was happy to help but I know mom was a very frugal person. I also so know to a degree she wasn’t exactly rich but if she could comfortably help, that would be great and it would only be for about 6 weeks knowing I could comfortably pay back.

    Turned out mom was planning a wedding gift and in lending us the money then told us we could keep it. This is when I go all DNA test ‘are you money laundering mom?’ on her. Our family has a code where you can help but only if you are not going to suffer.  It goes back generations.

    Mom was certain she wouldn’t be in any problems so I accepted. Problem solved.

    But what if I then found out mom lied ? She then couldn’t pay her water bill or food. The money she borrowed was gone, to pay for things. I would stop short of selling a limb or a child to make sure my mom is ok. I could never support knowing that I had gained by making someone else suffer. I would pull out all the stops if I found I had. It’s what I absolutely hate about the fixed gambling industry. By that I mean guaranteed RTP means if someone wins big, there’s a hefty chance a lot of people got punished. Sure, many will be frugal gamblers (I know) but many will be degenerate. Will have lost their family food for the week/month.

    If a casino can DEMAND Bandit does a selfie and hands over his complete bank statements, they can look at someone with evidence who has plunged their family into severe poverty and change what has happened.

    I’m not suggesting this is the answer. It sounds great I suppose. But it’s better than the current solution which is absolutely nothing other then a ‘go to gamstop and GA’.

    The difference is, I love my mom, mom loved me. The casino industry doesn’t give a flying fffff who it kills. Degenerate fully addictive give it everything gamblers are beyond any form of help at the point they have lost everything and yes, suicide is happened day in day out.

    Could they do more ? Yes. Should they do more ? without a doubt. This should be constructively debated, at least by the players. I have a feeling at least SOME people in the industry won’t want it to happen so will try to ruin it.

    in reply to: Possibly at my lowest point #61669
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Ivor, hope you are well 🙂

    I once fell asleep watching a bandit video and woke up eight hours later the fucker was still talking. I really don’t want him repeatedly saying your name if that sleep routine happens again. I might just start blurting it out in public without any form of control, or if I have to fill in a form or identify myself, I might bloody write your name or say it. Fcuk, hope the police don’t stop me, I’ll end up getting arrested for giving false name.

    1
    1
    in reply to: Abusive forum members Vs Bandits rule. #61668
    Mr B WANTED $395
    Blocked

    Eightblack wrote:

    Mr B wrote:

    So let it be known that bandits rules are irrelevant, (some of) the regulars are in charge and if they see fit, can abuse anyone they wish.

    That’s that sorted then. You won’t hear another word from me on the matter.

    Well I’m glad we won’t hear another word from you on the subject as your stance is the definition of hypocrisy.. The rules are play nice. Not every body take shit from Mr B but don’t give it back because he doesn’t like it.

    Why is it, when i am ready to bow out of a debate, someone has to bait me back in again ?

    How’s the panic attacks and anxiety coming along eightblack ? I supposed I should say I really don’t give a shit but I’m not that cunt.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 780 total)