Quazzi

Forum Menu

Forum Info

  • Town Status : Outlaw
  • Wanted Reward: $149
  • Topics Started : 16
  • Replies Created : 406

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 408 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Quite the morning. #61385
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    Congratulations brother.

    in reply to: Possibly at my lowest point #61085
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    Then you have more serious problems than you think you do ?

    2
    1
    in reply to: Possibly at my lowest point #61082
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    You cant delete posts.

    Not having a dig, but if you knew you’d get a bunch of negative responses (given the forums history) then why post atall?

    Okay, you said to vent. I get that, there are many other ways to vent than on a forum. Try masturbation.

    1
    in reply to: Compulsive gamblers want to lose? #61079
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    The Bandit wrote:

    It isn’t true in the slightest if you ask me, compulsive gamblers always want more is the problem they have, nothing is big enough, get to a grand you want 2 grand, get to 10 then you can get to 20, get to a million, well i could do 2 million and unfortunately, if you go that way, it will almost always end up at £0 won’t it.

    Im not so sure. Personally ivd been in the state of mind (some call it tilt) where Ive gone out of my way to blow my balance as fast as I can so that I can redeposit and carry on blowing my balance.

    For example, I have a 100 balance and start quickspinning £5 spins.. Lose the lot, redeposit another 100 and quickspin £10spins just to burn my money.

    Its a sick place in my head but my trail of thought usually goes like.. “Well if ive just blown 100 that i cant afford, might aswell blow another 100” and Ive done this to the tune of a couple grand, mulitple times.

    The entire time purposely doing stupid stakes to blow the lot.

    in reply to: GAME OF THRONES s8 (no spoilers) #61075
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    Am I the only one who found the first episode underwhelming?

    in reply to: No deposit free spins or cash #60577
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    The £88 bonus at 888 seems like a good deal but is capped at £15, so if you get a full line of explorers you’ll win only £15 and forfeit the rest.

    in reply to: Anyone fancy a cheap helicopter ? #60242
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    Spanners wrote:

    benq99 wrote:

    open to offers

    £10 ?

    £10.76 final offer.

    in reply to: £1000 chilli buys competition #60224
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    Biohazard wrote:

    That’s just variance guys, it’s brutal, but we should know by now what we’re signing up to when we commit to playing slots!

    Why pick Extra Chilli for a competition like this though? At least pick something safer! White Rabbit as @Haz40 says is always a decent choice as you’re normally guaranteed at least 50x.

    Chipmonkz won the BTG £5k chilli comp and I think he’s just giving it away via chilli bonus buys. He probs has a promotional agreagreement with BTG.

    in reply to: Yes a begging post #59721
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    Google Mcmillan cancer charity, they specifically help financly with people suffering with cancer. Give them a call.

    1
    in reply to: Question about percentages #59720
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    You have waaay too much time on your hands haha

    More importantly, who wins the golden goose?

    in reply to: Question about percentages #59682
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    Also this..

    This is a fun question whose paradoxical, self-referential nature quickly reveals itself – A) seems to be fine until one realizes the D) option is also 25%.

    A quick search reveals hundreds of discussion contributions of this problem, for example here and here and from a year ago. People often appear very confident that their answer is the only possible solution.

    I am no logician and so unqualified to place this within the grand structures of mathematical paradoxes. I have not waded through all the discussions and so there may be something I have missed, but in among all the arguments there seem to be four conclusions that could be considered as ‘correct’. These are my personal comments:

    1) There can be no solution, since the ambiguity of ‘correct’ makes the question ill-posed.

    It’s true the question is ambiguous, but this still seems a bit of a cop-out.

    2) There is no solution.

    This seems to take this interpretation of the question.

    Which answer (or set of answers) of “p%”, is such that the statement ‘the probability of picking such an answer is p%’ is true?

    Then this appears to be a well-posed question, but there is no solution.

    3) 0%.

    Consider a different interpretation of the question.

    Is there a p%, such that the statement ‘the probability of picking an answer “p%” is p%’ is true?

    Then this appears a well-posed question and has the solution p = 0, even though this is not one of the answers. Of course if answer C) were changed to “0%” (as it is in this 2007 version of the question ), then this would also have no solution.

    4) We can produce any answer we want by changing the probability distribution for the choice.

    Why should ‘random’ mean an equally likely chance of picking the 4 answers? If we, say, assume the probabilities of choosing (A) (B) (C) (D) to be (10%, 20%, 60%, 10%) then the answer to either formulation (2) and (3) is now “60%”. But if we make the distribution (12.5%, 15%, 60%, 12.5%) then we seem to back to square one again, since there is now both a 25% chance of picking “25%”, and a 60% chance of picking “60%”.

    I like conclusion 3) best, ie 0%.

    Maybe the main lesson is: ambiguity and paradox are often the basis for a good joke.

    Also the end.
    Credit google 😉

    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    Its just a graphical error as the bandit explained and no doubt paid what was intended but I agree its pretty shitty.

    in reply to: Question about percentages #59679
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    The answers 0.

    The end.

    in reply to: The Mrs Moaning Again Lol #59678
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    Ive given up helping around the house because im fed up of “not doing it properly”

    in reply to: Question about percentages #59605
    Quazzi WANTED $149
    Outlaw

    I thinks its meant to be an ambigious question resulting it debate. You could argue each of the answers and not technically be wrong.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 408 total)