Forum

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Forgot your mob were the serially offended.

 

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Who is acting like they’re “holier than thou” with the exception of you?

I admit I’m a foul mouthed arsehole, and my opinions rub people up the wrong way. That’s fine by me, if it’s not liked, and I get kicked off the forum, so be it.

you are the only cunt who acts like they abide by the rules, whilst at the same time, making threads antagonising people, and being “offensive” (I’m not easily offended so I don’t care what’s aimed at me on that front), but you do this, and then claim that you’ve only done it to prove some unfounded point that you like to try hide behind, that you’re not a tosser.

You are a tosser, and the quicker you realise this, the better.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Up the RA Megaways.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Mitros On Fire wrote:

Mr B wrote:

Maybe you could have a word with those breaking the rules, or indeed make a post.

As you know I have deliberately resorted to insults and it worked like a charm. Those people who start with insults then called me a hypocrite so it just needs you or indeed Mr B to reinforce it.

The ability to throw debates off course with insults is equally messy.

Obviously I don’t want to turn yet another thread into a drama. But from the middle paragraph there you seem to be suggesting that you insulted people but it was ok because you were proving a point. But anyone else insulting anyone is breaking rules. If that’s not what you meant then fine but if it is, how and why is that any different?

That’s exactly what he’s saying. It’s actually embarrassing.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Lee Wallace.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

I’m good at breaking them if that’s any use ?

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

All in yesterday*

including spending*

 

also I’m an illiterate cunt, apparently.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

I lost 2 grand all I’m yesterday, including spend ages on donuts at £2.50 to get a 76x multiplier that paid…. £0.00 ???

dead or alive 2 fucking skinned me too.

failure of a day ??

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Just Basics wrote:

New games paying and fun to play? Hmmm have i got Dejavu?

Milk it til they flip the switch guys!

#SameOld

Haha, yeah! I used to pretty much always win on new releases. Then I’d spunk 2 grand into them on higher stakes. ??

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

They’ve still got Novos there. I was playing Book of Ra the other day.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Waiting for the argyl call out thread.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

Well over 1000 spins for two bonuses and neither paid even 10x…  first thoughts… dogshit. I’ll keep soldiering on though.

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

You’re just so fucking easy to wind up. I should stop…

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

You’ll never get the hang of it haha, it’s just a case of winging it.

 

Even with £100 it’s not hard to lose a balance quickly at 20p stakes

[Rb Rbreen91 WANTED $493 Outlaw]

argyl53 wrote:

No I sincerely want to know….I made 3 claims in my last few posts:

1. KYC is part of regulation created to prevent money laundering and crime and is not specific to the gambling industry, rather they are just one of the sectors covered by it.

2. KYC checks, while something casinos are required to undertake, is not the only information they use when determining whether or not a player’s account should be flagged as a potential problem gambler.

3. Gambling addiction often coincides with pre-existing mental health issues which may be a contributing factor in suicides among gambling addicts.

So…which of these claims is it Mr B thinks is wrong / incorrect? It must be at least one of them because I haven’t said anything else.

You’re wrong, just because you’re wrong… not for any real reason, just accept you’re wrong.

[Author]

Posts