Forum

[sa samtheman WANTED $3 Outlaw]

groundiskey wrote:

Today’s selections Sunday 30th September 2018

HORSES 14:10 Musselburgh – Nate The Great (2/11)
14:30 Epsom – Persian Moon (Evs)
17:05 Naas – Mount Everest (4/5)

OK – I’m sure other people are thinking it but I’m going to be the first to say it.   Listing a 2/11 shot is hardly a tip.  This list just looks like someone has gone down a list of all the odds on or better favourites and picked 3 at random.

Here are my matching footy tips

Arsenal to beat Burton Town U11’s

Man Utd to beat 11 guys were watching from the side of the pitch and decided to form a team (that’s a long shot)

Spurs to beat the Dagenham Girl Pipers

 

[sa samtheman WANTED $3 Outlaw]

Bazz wrote:

BSK1 wrote:

5:20 Ayr tomorrow lads Tank top

Just got this one through and they’re more often than not absolutely spot on. Wouldn’t normally put this on but wouldn’t one people to miss out. The lad said it’s a hell of a jumper

Never ran and it was a flat race???

Actually GroundKey misheard the guy – what he actually said was that the horse had a very woolly coat and would make one hell of jumper – hence the name Tank Top 🙂

[sa samtheman WANTED $3 Outlaw]

Thes bonus buys are becoming more prevalent, and it’s all about player psychology.  Over the years they have been trained to think that if they get a bonus they will win.  SpinalTap, Chilli and Rabbit are clear evidence that this isn’t the case.

Now you can win big, but you need a big bank roll (exactly the sort of person the casino’s want) but to my mind it takes away the fun of the game, seeing the bonus drop in, and also means you are doing hundred pound spins, justifying it on the basis you are getting a bonus,   To then guarantee you a totally shite bonus (in most cases) unless you then gamble that £100 on the spin of a wheel at least twice is just evil – and again plays to player psychology that it must due (it’s never due!!!)

cunning devils these casinos

[sa samtheman WANTED $3 Outlaw]

ligarr wrote:

Ive had over 1000 wild desires in my time,only ever hit 4 once,luckily it was a good one with michael/amber/jack landing…paid £7492.50 on 3 quid stake:).

Had 4 wild lines on playboy which paid over 12k from £3 stake

Jurasic park hit a 4 wild lines but that paid the least about 3.4k as didnt hit any premium symbols with it so basically paid same as full screen trex.

My goals are to get 5 wild lines on any of them:)

And of course anyone reading this would think wow almost £23k, he must be so up on the slots.  But would I be right in guessing that overall you are down?  The slots give the, but they tend to take it away faster – nice hits though and that romance one must have been a real rush.

Usual warning to any newbies reading this- if the casinos have given liggar £23k on relatively small stakes, they have sure as hell taken £50k off someone else!

[sa samtheman WANTED $3 Outlaw]

sportsbetpunk wrote:

I have a friend who is in management at William Hill, saw him for the first time in a while this week.

 

I asked him about their plans post FOBT and he said they’d be doing the following.

Removing all FOBT stations and replacing them with a seating area and tablets so customers can log in online and play high stakes in store. Customers can cash out instantly. There will be offers to encourage new players.

This will be a stop gap until further regulation comes into the online sector.

What would be the point in that?  They would be maintaining a large building with all the associated staff costs for people who on the most part play online at home.

They would also be rubbing this circumnavigation of the law in the governments faces and encourage them to look more closely at online gambling.

there would still have to be somewhere to input cash, which makes it an FOBT in all but name – many people don’t take cards into bookies as it limits there losses.

If I want to play online slots I might as well sit in the house rather than drive into town, pay for parking and sit in front of a computer with half a dozen Chinese or Africans standing behind me shouting Red 3

 

[sa samtheman WANTED $3 Outlaw]

All of the options being offered are short term – a long term solution is needed, and I’m sure the bandits time is better spent focusing on a permanent solution than constantly re-uploading videos to different sites, to watch them disappear a week later

[sa samtheman WANTED $3 Outlaw]

Everyone advises you to play on line as they pay big – but these casinos aren’t charities, and for someone to win big some other poor sucker is going to get ass raped by the slots.  You just have to hope someone has been to the prison showers before you arrive and has taken one for the team.

[sa samtheman WANTED $3 Outlaw]

wow – I now know what the definition of a “dogshit game” is.   Obviously you can’t expect to win on every bonus buy, but when you get that amount of symbols you don’t expect a 60% return – twice.

[sa samtheman WANTED $3 Outlaw]

Win_Spin wrote:

Hi

I would like to warn any players who consider playing at FrankFred Casino.

I was allowed to play at their site when I should have been denied, due to being self-excluded for gambling issues on their sister sites, who use the same license.

Not only was I allowed to play, but I was also denied refund of lost deposits.

I asked for an explanation and after almost a month they responded and confirmed I was self excluded from their sister sites, but had not given gambling issues as a reason for the exclusion.

This is incorrect as I know I gave gambling problems as the reason for the exclusion.

We all know what would’ve happened if I won big and wanted to cash out.

I will write an MGA-complaint as a last attempt to retrieve my money back.

Proof of my claims can be given upon request.

Will write an update if anything changes.

Seriously?  You have gambling problems so you joined an online site to gamble.   You then proceeded to lose and now want your money back.

If it works let me know, I will be down the local bookies within an hour to claim back all the money I have lost to them.  Just to make it clear my line to them is “I have a problem with gambling, lost my money so can I have it back as you shouldn’t have let me gamble”

Hopefully they won’t use the personal responsibility line – everyone knows that doesn’t apply to gamblers

 

[Author]

Posts