Forum

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

EnglishGuy wrote:

I’m concerned.

No need to be he’s just having a break 🙂

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

Jumpsy74 wrote:

Well holy shit I’ve finally had the big x win but not on the game I wanted mt2 still trolling me but I can’t complain laid in bed on the iPad the other night playing Mental only on 40p stakes and it rolls in a win (not even a bonus) on one of the premium symbols only goes to 4th reel but it had 3 of the multipliers on it I think it was a 30x 15x 10x and only a few symbols so I’m thinking maybe £200-£250 ish which I’d be well pleased with on 40p stakes so it does the usual speed up slow down count ups then fooks off big time and ends on £5400 so a quick look at the calculator and it was 13500x good job I was laid down I’d have f’kin fallen over if I’d been stood up ha ha, as the bandit would say it blew the f’kin doors off

Nice win mate yeah its great when they go past where you was expecting the win to be at first. 🙂

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

Ok folks calm it down. I don’t want this fully kicking off. Thanks

From my personal experience having met both Chip and Jord they was both polite and nice and just like any other people you could meet when out having a beer.

I do think it is time to put a stop to the hate and stuff towards him here. If you have a complaint go express it the correct way on his forum/website.

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Seedy wrote:

Sounds about right mate hahahaha lower stake win or bonus nice win though put it in the big wins.

Ohhh mate … I was hopping … Mrs was in the bread bin, one kid was in the washing machine the other one got stuffed up the chimney ….. lucky I play for fun eh …

pahahaha yeah its great that you don’t take it to seriously 😉

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

Sounds about right mate hahahaha lower stake win or bonus 🙂 nice win though put it in the big wins.

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Sorry mate after that brutality of that video, we need to top the punishment for you, has to happen,  next video you need to top this one With extra “ what the fuck” hi jinx ….so I’m commanding @seedy to strap you down and get you on ………wild swarm ……there I’ve said it…

 

(don’t ask me why, but I’ve been fucking around with it this week and I still like the game ….plus @xbob says you have to… )

You do realise that Ste’s hands are bigger than my head I try strap him down I will likely just get picked up and held at arms length with my legs just wiggling about. 🙂

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

Ok is this something that happened elsewhere if so not on here folks im closing this now as its again just a argument that has nothing to do with the topic or on Biam.

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

Malkychamp wrote:

First and last coupon win of the season

Probably 😅😅

 

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

igc-rm wrote:

My apologies, just to be clear, I am calling for what casinos seem to have… pre-register with strict ID requirements. Then stringent kyc sow ideas to be looked at to follow that. Maybe even not being able to walk in with cash is a thing, just like online. Debit card withdrawals can’t be done in a gambling venue now if a person has “block gambling transactions” on their banking app. You can’t use their desk card machine or any standalone cashpoint because it is tied to a gambling venue.

Ask in any bookies now what kyc means and they will either vaguely remember or know nothing about it. If you go down a couple hundred in ladbrokes, you might get a question played as friendly chat but if you go way more down in betfred, they don’t ask anything and places like shipley and admiral have no issue with anyone blowing the lot.

I am very serious that people who can’t, shouldn’t. They can easily do this. Sure, it needs to be more complex, when it comes to kyc sow etc but currently it’s abysmal. 2021 and you can even more easily have your family life ruined by yourself or your loved one with gambling addiction. There was a lot said before about people who fall for it deserve it but we know they aren’t 100% to blame and the loved ones there of couldn’t be spoken about because it screwed up their case entirely, in regards to blaming the addict. This was never about blame, it was about prevention.

imagine : dad’s not coming home because he saw a man get two £500 jackpots and tried to replicate it to make our lives easier and put us in the soup kitchen. the imagination can run wild and still not fall far short of the reality. Thousands of times.

I am bloody glad you support this whole initiative that something better needs to be done. I am not saying any idea I have is workable or best but I truly believe it is at least heading in the right direction to make sure the kids food money doesn’t go in the slot machine.

I think using current method’s like KYC or SoW cant really be well implemented in a land based operation online yes it works although it doesn’t work flawlessly. I think if you can stop it at bank level meaning all land based operations sign up to an initiative that means anyone registered to block card gambling transactions is therefore not able to gamble this would however require no cash going into actual machines. Again though this would require that said person to register for the transaction to be blocked via there bank.

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

igc-rm wrote:

Firstly, gamstop for all betting places, virtual or not. This is 100% a must. I suspect is already on the way. Should have existed a long time ago.

Unfortunately this wont work as like all restrictive measure to help problem gamblers Gamstop is a voluntary enrollment system they already have this in self exclusion in bookies etc. Without physically taking away the individuals right to waiver any said or placed action say by a spouse etc its just not possible as it would cause all sorts of human rights acts etc.

igc-rm wrote:

I would also explain to every employee why.

I cant claim to know anything here but my assumption is that bookies etc are all trained in some way about self exclusion I dunno.

igc-rm wrote:

I would also expect EVERY betting place to fund it.

Hard to press them to fund the entire thing its like asking all pubs to fund AA etc I’m sure something could be done though.

igc-rm wrote:

Anyone who falls thru the net, gets fully supported so their children dont lose a parent, and so on. Vulnerable people should NOT be getting thru the door.

If a full infrastructure could be put in place that would work to prevent gambling then if any fully registered UK gamble company Online/Offline is at fault for letting someone play they should be held accountable. However if policing gambling is such a strict and tight way is at some point managed I think as we already see online unregistered gambling companies will pop up who is answerable then?

Lots to think about and possibly no 100% way to police.

 

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

igc-rm wrote:

Reported as inappropriate content and removed from the recent topics.

Yet a valid question, even reluctantly by the industry standards.

Sorted I found nothing wrong with this question.

 

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

igc-rm wrote:

Can I ask what you would be timing me out for ? Please show a specific example of me speaking the truth or lie, or insulting anyone. I’m in a good mood, speaking the truth and not unlike some, being ignorant when it suits me.

 

You are contributing and continuing an argument from a previous thread. Please don’t try to be a smart arse about it my request was simple the 3 of you drop it.

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

Do I just need to give the 3 (Xbob, Maskwearer and igc_rm) of you all a 24 hour time out or something. This just stop’s between the 3 of you now.

1. I’ve given you chance to just get it sorted between yourselves.

2. It seems like me telling you to just stay out of each others threads if you can’t just say something without arguing. (didn’t work)

So do me a favor all of you log out take a breath away from it all come back in better moods and if you can’t be civil don’t comment on each others threads its fairly easy I don’t expect you all to get along but I would expect you all to just be able to move on.

Thanks,

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

Xbobmad wrote:

Pays for your losing bets till Christmas

Probably not need a fair few more for that! 😅

 

[Seedy WANTED $1,245 Sheriff]

The devil wrote:

Been a member a few years now seedy and my personal opinion is I do believe at times you do show favouritism, I come here to talk about gambling that’s what this forum is for but most of the time it sways off into any old shite and I’ve seen many come and go some deserved but some maybe a little passionate about something and still getting the boot and then some who have done exactly the same and are still here so even though yes I bet you get sick of it if one goes for being abusive, out of order etc then so should the other but like I say doesn’t always happen but that’s just my opinion

As always you all are welcome to have your opinion. I can say that in my ban list most are banned for spam and the next highest are marked for giving me abuse for whatever reason lol. I will let things go as much as I can and always push for you all sort your issues out between yourselves. But ultimately sometimes I have to say stop and then I get the shit which is where I draw the line im just trying to keep the peace mate. Which ultimately is harder than it seems. 😅

[Author]

Posts