Forum

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Arlonewts wrote:

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Eightblack wrote:

Nice hit! Last time I played that it stripped me of £40 with no bonus on 20p spins lol, still better treatment than bonanza though

 

I reckon return of kong is the best megaways I’ve had a few 1000x bonuses on there

How do you find not getting to buy the chance for a higher position in the game ? Did you ever buy the bonus ? …. when kong first came on vs I had a cracking win on it and I was pissing around, ever since it’s been scared to show me its big win sign , but also I find it soooooooo har eto bonus ….harder than bonanza hard ……and I agree In the “bonanza “ style megaways, kong has to be the one if not the top ..( tho  safari one has a really interesting bonus, when it retriggers …which could top that )

Har eto? ‘Tho’ has a ugh on the end. Come on ‘champ’ don’t embarrass yourself after pointing out my spelling mistakes the other day to try and win an argument! If your going to call out someone’s spelling mistakes better make sure your perfect!!

Technically my spelling wasn’t  wrong, it’s just in a different language …. so yeah .. predictive texts…… go figure, and “ tho “ is fine In slang,  it doesn’t change the sentence direction … you spelt a key word wrong so it did change your sentence …. big difference …..but you know, you keep pointing at it …

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Rmarni wrote:

The Bandit is one of my favourite streamers, I’ve been following him for nearly four years, but the streams are becoming irregular?? I know Bandit has a life, and YouTube are making it difficult, but why not post on the forum every Sunday and the occasional mid week session? Just a follower missing my slotting buddy.

He’s active an twitter, and he’s always dipping in an out here, to be honestly I think he would have had a gut full of people last few weeks moaning at him, and like you said , family’s and a very busy work load ( this isn’t his only line of work) ….once everything settles and the trouble makers get bored and fuck off he’ll be around …

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

eejit101 wrote:

By my actual calculations, that would take – 7 weeks of constant playing. On 2 sites.

 

Not too bad, off ya pop “Steven”

I want to ask about the calculation…. but I know my brain will bleed out my ears from the sheer maths of it …… so I’ll nod and say “ yep …. what he said “

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Xbobmad wrote:

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Probably helps if your not blocked …..

Yeah if you look at the username it becomes obvious why

Think i need help with this one, It’s an obvious one I’m not seeing ? .. Mitzy ????

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Mitzy wrote:

Lol that guy seems annoyed . First time posting and just wondering is every comment that I put going to be moderated first as I don’t think il be able to keep a convo going if it takes so long. Sorry if I sound like I’m. Moaning I’m not. Just checking thanks

Probably helps if your not blocked …..

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Winningbird wrote:

Nope not me. Must have been a blue tit

Noooo, I’d never smack our Haz, not for that anyway

That’s exactly what somebody planning to do it would say …………be careful … she’s a tricky dickie bird ……..

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Damn i wouldn’t think  that be  possible for a video, it would take an age and a half to hit every spin amount on the gamble, I’d imagine you’d be filming and depositing for a few weeks ……..not like chilli where you need 4 wins in a row or 5 ……you’d need to hit 10 in a row for the 50 …. and since the first gamble of 8 spins to 10 can be harsh ( and I mean harsh with a Capitol H) I’d hate to see the bandit after he finished

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Haz40 wrote:

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Right,  winningbird needs a title ????  Now this really could be a 30 page thread ( of niceness obviously)

I called her fit bird once . Surprised i didn’t get a virtual slap.

She hasn’t forgotten , she’s saving it …….. one day ….boom …..

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Rbreen91 wrote:

Pipe down mockingbird

Mockingbird …..genius ????????

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Eightblack wrote:

Nice hit! Last time I played that it stripped me of £40 with no bonus on 20p spins lol, still better treatment than bonanza though

 

I reckon return of kong is the best megaways I’ve had a few 1000x bonuses on there

How do you find not getting to buy the chance for a higher position in the game ? Did you ever buy the bonus ? …. when kong first came on vs I had a cracking win on it and I was pissing around, ever since it’s been scared to show me its big win sign , but also I find it soooooooo har eto bonus ….harder than bonanza hard ……and I agree In the “bonanza “ style megaways, kong has to be the one if not the top ..( tho  safari one has a really interesting bonus, when it retriggers …which could top that )

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Right,  winningbird needs a title ????  Now this really could be a 30 page thread ( of niceness obviously)

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Xbobmad wrote:

Winningbird wrote:

Seedy, as honoured as I am, I feel mrs bandit should be lady of BIAM, though she doesnt come on here

She got the ban hammer from Seedy

??? got  ban hammered,  brilliant …. he saw the name mrs b and instantly through jb was trying a new “ sexy “ infiltration “ if I just remove the “ j” they’ll have no idea”

( I think bigdaddycool really is jb ……..Who else would nname their profile that ?)

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

jamie_evans wrote:

4 – Streamers get Winmode from the casino to show them winning. UNTRUE. It’s physically not possible to give a player a game result thay wins. For the games to be provided No one can touch a gameround from it being hit spin by the player, the RNG doing it’s verified spin, the result being sent from the provider to the casino to the player. Not possible. Casinos cannot, and would not, do this. Casinos pay the provider a % for each amount lost on their games (averages around 12%) and the casinos keep 88% for them.

I’m fairly certain you’re right about streamers getting “winmode” being untrue, but that it’s not possible isn’t strictly correct.

The casino ultimately has full control of the slot.  Not because it can alter a result generated by the provider (though it can in some cases reject it and I’ll come to that later) but because it controls the interface through which you access the slot.  And this power enables casinos to do anything they want.  Because most slots are now HTML5 based, anyone (including the casino) can download the full front end of the slot, modify the link sources, and host it themselves.  But what about the RNG / result generator?  Well, if you reconfigure the front-end to look at a back-end other than that of the provider, such as an API of your own, you could send any result you wanted.  It’s not easy to reproduce and manipulate providers responses, but it is very easy to record the message payloads (results) of a very successful and legitimate session, stick them in a database, and send them sequentially on request.  This is similar to how providers reproduce videos of bonuses, like BTG did for the Tesla competition recently, except they already have the game data.  To keep this a secret I imagine it would be virtually impossible, unless almost every employee of the casino were totally corrupt and trusted not to spill the beans, and the casino were not thoroughly audited – but then I know what technical audits are like and the evidence you provide is never interrogated.  It’s not difficult to conceal from a technical perspective though.

So back to the rejection of results.  The communication path for a spin of a typical slot is player (request) > provider (request) > casino (response) > provider (response) > player.  The provider request is the important part here.  The result of a game is generated by the provider before any communication is done with the casino or the player.  In the provider request, they’re doing three things all at once, but not in the order one would expect:  (1) They’re notifying the casino of the result of the game in their request, (2) checking that the response is okay (3) reading the updated balance which the casino has calculated from the result of the game.  Step 3 is necessary because, although providers are able to keep track of your balance from the play of the slot, they don’t have visibility of all the games you’re playing and you could be playing two different slots at the same time, or have made a deposit while playing.  Some slots will show a deduction in your balance as soon as you press spin, and update with any win amount, but not update with the true balance the casino responded with until spin is pressed again.  This is why many slots need to be spun twice for a new deposit to appear.  So the order of steps 1 and 2 are the issue here, and their precipitated by this four-way RESTful design pattern.  The provider is notifying the casino of a game result before even checking that you have sufficient funds to cover the game round.  The casino is able to make a decision on whether or not to credit your account with a win.  If the casino were to respond to say you don’t have enough funds because they wanted to reject your win, then the provider would have a log of this and which would be potential evidence of foul play sitting outside of the casino, if investigated.  Plus, the player would be wondering what the hell was going on when they get a message in the slot saying insufficient funds.  But what if the casino didn’t respond at all?  What if they allowed the connection in, read the request, decided nah we’re not giving the player this win, and just held the connection open until it timed out?  Or it responded to the provider with a server error?  The provider can’t show you the win because it doesn’t even know if your balance was ever sufficient to play in the first place.

I realize this is very cynical, but wherever money goes, greed and corruption will follow.  And this simple little trick could be carried out with minimal people knowing.  Maybe just a single developer or single engineer.  And the big boss of course.

Sorry if the above seemed ignorant of your knowledge on the matter, I went in to detail more for the laymen of the forum.

Soo what your saying is …….. it’s magic

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Seedy wrote:

Very good post BigDaddy Titles now Given…..

WB – Lady of BIAM.

Haz – Sir Fisherman

Eejit – Sir Sheepy lover

Seyahkram – Sir Llama lover

Xbob – Sir Donut

Rbreen – King Troll

Glad to see you all with me for the fresh year

 

Did seedy In one swish move tarnish the two welsh boys as animal lovers ????? ?????

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706 Outlaw]

Rbreen91 wrote:

Yeah, I was gonna be out of the country for work longer than my passport would allow so I needed it within 3 days

Yeah I was working in America  and had to get mine, just like you , but I did the ultimate sacrifice ….. I went to …..Liverpool !!!!!! to have it done on the day ….( I’m only teasing you Liverpool fellows, your Great )

 

[Author]

Posts