Seyahkram1977

Forum Menu

Forum Info

  • Town Status : Outlaw
  • Wanted Reward: $706
  • Topics Started : 200
  • Replies Created : 2412

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 2,422 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Longest losing streak? #110296
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    MaskWearer wrote:

    Megaways and high volatile slots are the only games worth playing.

    The low volatility slots don’t give you a chance to get far enough ahead but if you hit big on a high volatility slot you get 5,000x or more, wins that can make a month or a year. If you hit one of the ultra high volatility slots and get 50,000x +, that will definitely make your year. At least it should but I don’t underestimate the degeneracy of people here lol

    Longest losing streak? I’ve had so many. I think my worst experience was losing > 5000x on WWTBAM Megaways without getting an actual bonus (kept gambling and losing on 8 spins). When I finally got a bonus I think it paid 12x so totally worth it. I had a bonus recently on Bonanza that paid 0x after waiting a couple hours to get it. I’d never seen that before couldn’t fucking believe it, not a single win finish 1x multiplier

    The high volatility slots are brutal but that’s why we love them, right? WWTBAM is so fucking sick on the first gamble but I wouldn’t have it any other way, it’s one of the best slots ever made (It’s Bonanza (96%) with higher volatility and higher RTP (96.24%))

     

    Millionaire is a beginning of a session game for me, love it, and the demon computer smasher kicks in that first gamble fails…. But in the years it’s been out, with constant ( ish) plays… I’ve never got to the first safe zone…..

    in reply to: Prize draws #110267
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    Slot wrote:

    Mutchy wrote:

    Will it be a kit kat chunky with the two bars in it?

    A limited edition one?

    Be more specific.

    Deposit 10

    deposit 20

    deposit 30

    deposit 40

    deposit 50

    deposit 100

    That vegan one can go suck a massive camel scrotum, (I can say this cause my Mrs is a filthy vegan) but that key lime pie one? …. Yes please

    in reply to: Longest losing streak? #110266
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    TJTom wrote:

    never see a poor bookie as they say.

    This👆,

    like you’ve said you’re  playing very volatile slots, so if it’s affecting home finances then take a break, because that takes president over gaming, or if it’s money you can lose maybe clean the tastebuds with softer less asshole  games, I mean it doesn’t mean you’re going to win more, but maybe it’ll get you back to just simple fun slotting rather than the hard grind of a megaways,

     

    in reply to: Breaking the rules. #110201
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    The devil wrote:

    I’ve called Bob slots out about this lord ping scenario and said the same thing I just get called a troll and message deleted,

    .  by highlighting this it shows there’s a different set of rules they follow which could be more “ part of the workforce “ rather than “ we like you here’s a bonus, please come spend time on our casino” which isn’t what punters expect,

    so it’s not a shock they’d cut down any dialogue highlighting it.

    in reply to: Advertising #110195
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    MaskWearer wrote:

    Videoslots idea of a retirement plan

    Ha, fucking right….

    1
    1
    in reply to: Strange Reel King & Robbing Roulette #110194
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    WiggyOfStHelens wrote:

    Haha they were shit tops but i’ll take record for the lowest top of 20p…   id like the highest top but we’ll leave that for the big man 🙂

    No matter man, top is a top

    in reply to: Prize draws #110193
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    Slot wrote:

    Yes soon prize draws coming back

    prize

    1 5 free spins

    2 lollipop

    3 KitKat choc bar

    keep join casinos links lose more money you will have chance to win one of the prizes

     

     

    A Kit Kat choc bar ??? No fucking way …..hold my beer

    in reply to: Breaking the rules. #110184
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    I ment “confirmation lot of the stories about the lack of legitimacy “

    in reply to: Breaking the rules. #110183
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    Regarding the post tho, they probably have a deal where they are advertising the casinos, so the rules are slightly bent,  again if they are doing it and are allowed to do it ( even tho we know the rules say no) we can assume they have a deal and will confirm  a lot of the stories about legitimacy

    in reply to: Energy Casino #110182
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    Kev3uk1981 wrote:

    Good morning.

     

    Played on Energy Casino for the first time yesterday and had a good win on Book Of Ming, £352.75 off of 70 free spins on 50p stake! Think it is about win multiplier of 706x

    It wont let me submit it in the big wins part unfortunately.

    Your pic might be to big, on your phone or laptop, add a filter to the picture and save it, it tends to save those as a smaller file size and should go through ………..maybe …

    in reply to: Breaking the rules. #110181
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    thunderball6 wrote:

    I’m guessing he has got the ok to do it . Because will he be doing the deposit from the UK , and then they play . I remember bandits wife , pressed to gamble on reel king or deal or no deal ,and somebody actually said they could confiscate winnings because he not pressing it 😆.

    That’s fucking mental isn’t it, my Mrs presses a but and I could lose it…. My head would explode

    in reply to: unreal cubes 2 run #110117
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    Been saying it for months, as boring, as drawn out the base game is ( and it can be a fucking shit when you do bonus ) the game has mass potential……

    in reply to: Fake vs Real : An FYI for Bandit and Co #110055
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    GameRoom wrote:

    Seyahkram1977 wrote:

    GameRoom wrote:

    Seyahkram1977 wrote:

    GameRoom wrote:

    Xbobmad wrote:

    When bandit verifies, will that legitimise the service or get him the same dogs abuse that chip gets. It doesn’t work both ways, so people gotta make your choice.

    don’t be stupid we are here for Bandit not for Chip…If I want to support Chip I will go to his forum and join all his links..I will not come here to support Bandit…..Bandit is on High-level pls don’t compare Chip with Bandit or RockNRoall…If you are FanBoy of Chip and trying everything to push in here to like Chip you only doing damage to Bandit forum and him…so pls stop all the BS about Chip you cant force anyone to like him

    This isn’t what Bob is saying, think you’ve miss read his intentions, what I think  he’s saying is

    because people don’t like chip, it wouldn’t matter who did the checks, if they came back and verified him as legitimate the chip  “ haters” would then start hating the company doing the checks,

    because they feel that chip isn’t honest, any organisation who verified him would instantly be corrupt in their eyes  (even tho they might have  verified a streamer they liked and that was fine) ….. so if a company verified  bandit (a streamer you like ) and that is fine, you can’t then call them dirty if  they Verify  a streamer you don’t like….they would use the same System for both so it’s either all correct or not at all….we use feelings to work out if we trust streamers, the company would  use “facts” so unless people understand there a  0.0001% he is legit and if he is they’ll just have to move on, then there is no organisation that can over turn your feelings towards him even if factually they say he is legit……

    even in this thread you see people mention that files can be changed and corrupted and altered, there’s already a reason to not trust the system…

    so what I think Bob is saying is that regardless of what ever system of verification we have and who does it. unless they give us  the result we believe it should ( on people we don’t like ) we will never agree with it and the conversation will never end…

    Personally I don’t like the chip product, I don’t know the dude, I do believe it’s affiliated cash he’s using and he’s not the kind of energy i enjoy… so I’d find it hard to believe that any company would find him legit, but I have to keep a % that he might be, because facts trump feelings …( but I doubt it)

    when I read comments like this show who they get verified and flag by forums is not a good start, I am sure is more out there on RocknRolla Forum is like 20 pages to read

    I agree with you 100%…

    if these guys check abet more and do not give easy verification badges they will be more respectful of what they do… but 3 streamers got verified 2 are playing on casinos know they can only play on fake money add by a casino and another one balance jump for £10k well streaming..I know is hard to check someone like chip he posts 4-5 videos and 1 stream every 12hrs, but I don’t think someone like Bandit RockNRolla will credit from this, they will only give credit to this page and they will give credit to all other streamers they use this verification page…Proving you are real stream is very easy start stream login to all your casinos and show what you did on past in-out up-down just like Bandit or Rolla did meany times on past

    I also think they should get a streamer category  A Bandit Rolla  B other streamer C ….  so on you cant have someone streaming for 5-6 years and be the same category with someone start 3-4 weeks ago

    and value what casino they playing if is a shit casino or a bad casino, do casinos offer fake money or not…so new players will know what casino Bandit Rolla will play  is it worth supporting or start playing on casinos they play, they also will know who is top UK streamers

    Yeah i agree, i can see massive black holes in the verifying idea, to me it’s like employee of the month, it means fuck all to anybody out side, the see it, think “ that’s nice “ and basically as long as you turn up on time you’ll get it one day….

    <span style=”font-size: 1rem;”>but some people will need to see the tick  or the crosses before they understand what good streamers give and what bad streamers do, like I need to see ukgc stamp on casinos before I consider using them( but saying that I’ve been  very vocal about how strong I think their rules have been )</span>

    like I said I don’t think you will ever find a company that can produce these verification that every person will agree with, so I think companies like yours above will flourish ….

    in reply to: Strange Reel King & Robbing Roulette #110039
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    Offffff laptop would go flying 1st class

    in reply to: Fake vs Real : An FYI for Bandit and Co #110037
    Seyahkram1977 WANTED $706
    Outlaw

    GameRoom wrote:

    Seyahkram1977 wrote:

    GameRoom wrote:

    Xbobmad wrote:

    When bandit verifies, will that legitimise the service or get him the same dogs abuse that chip gets. It doesn’t work both ways, so people gotta make your choice.

    don’t be stupid we are here for Bandit not for Chip…If I want to support Chip I will go to his forum and join all his links..I will not come here to support Bandit…..Bandit is on High-level pls don’t compare Chip with Bandit or RockNRoall…If you are FanBoy of Chip and trying everything to push in here to like Chip you only doing damage to Bandit forum and him…so pls stop all the BS about Chip you cant force anyone to like him

    This isn’t what Bob is saying, think you’ve miss read his intentions, what I think  he’s saying is

    because people don’t like chip, it wouldn’t matter who did the checks, if they came back and verified him as legitimate the chip  “ haters” would then start hating the company doing the checks,

    because they feel that chip isn’t honest, any organisation who verified him would instantly be corrupt in their eyes  (even tho they might have  verified a streamer they liked and that was fine) ….. so if a company verified  bandit (a streamer you like ) and that is fine, you can’t then call them dirty if  they Verify  a streamer you don’t like….they would use the same System for both so it’s either all correct or not at all….we use feelings to work out if we trust streamers, the company would  use “facts” so unless people understand there a  0.0001% he is legit and if he is they’ll just have to move on, then there is no organisation that can over turn your feelings towards him even if factually they say he is legit……

    even in this thread you see people mention that files can be changed and corrupted and altered, there’s already a reason to not trust the system…

    so what I think Bob is saying is that regardless of what ever system of verification we have and who does it. unless they give us  the result we believe it should ( on people we don’t like ) we will never agree with it and the conversation will never end…

    Personally I don’t like the chip product, I don’t know the dude, I do believe it’s affiliated cash he’s using and he’s not the kind of energy i enjoy… so I’d find it hard to believe that any company would find him legit, but I have to keep a % that he might be, because facts trump feelings …( but I doubt it)

    when I read comments like this show who they get verified and flag by forums is not a good start, I am sure is more out there on RocknRolla Forum is like 20 pages to read

    I agree with you 100%…

    1
Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 2,422 total)