trr420

Forum Menu

Forum Info

  • Town Status : Blocked
  • Wanted Reward: $7
  • Topics Started : 2
  • Replies Created : 111

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 113 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Video slots #83447
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    Casinos do ANYTHING to try and make profit. Some examples include, but are not limited to – Lowering RTP.
    SO CHECK THE RTP, PROBLEM SOLVED.

    Delaying payments
    PLAY SOMEWHERE THAT WON’T. LIKE VIDEOSLOTS WHO PAY OUT QUICKER THAN ANYWHERE ELSE. ALWAYS DID.

    Adding questionable legality on bonus terms.
    USE CASH OR READ THE T&C’S PROPERLY

    Delaying cashouts for reasons not due to SOW/AML/KYC
    TELL THE GOVERNEMNT WHO MAKE THEM NOW

    Removing bonus terms after cashouts are performed
    SOUNDS ILLEGAL, PROBABLY A DODGY WHITE LABEL SITE

    My company doesn’t do this.
    GOOD MAN FOR MAKING SURE THEY DON’T.

    And as I currently am head of the department that basically has oversight on this, and I sign the deals and contracts, I damn well choose to stick to it.
    BUT YOU’RE THEY GUY THAT SAID YOU DON’T NEED TO LISTEN TO THE UK GAMBLING COMMISSIONS RULES.

    I prefer my slots at 94% RTP.” I would say you are mad
    I DIDN’T SAY I DO. BUT THERE’S A LOT OF INSANE PEOPLE PLAY 92,93 AND94% SLOTS ON A DAILY BASIS. I DON’T USELESSLY CHECK THE RTP, SO I NEED ANTI PSYCHOTICS MAN LOL.

    Yes they are responsible gaming ones, and to be fair Videoslots does a lot for responsible gaming.
    NO REASON TO COMPLAIN BECAUSE YOU DON’T LIKE HOW THEY WROTE A NEWS ARTICLES AND CHANGED THE RTP THAT IS FULLY VISIBLE TO ANYONE THAT WANTS TO LOOK THEN LOL.

    I have played at VS for over 2 years. I like the site. I dont really play battles, and I dont care for the jackpot wheels, but the weekend booster is very clever. If they came out and said we lower all slots to 95% on our site as we offer this… then fine. But I prefer to win money, not get back tiny portions of what I lose.
    AT LEAST YOU ARE MAN ENOUGH TO ADMIT YOU ARE UNHAPPY YOU DIDN’T WIN. MAN ENOUGH TO ADMIT YOU JUST WANT TO WIN MORE. HOWEVER, A WIN ISN’T GUARANTEED ON 96%. IT EQUALS A SMALLER LOSS. UNLESS YOU ARE LUCKY ON MORE GAMES YOU PLAY LESS OF.

    So yes TTR, I will damn well keep doing what I am doing, as if they can catch me out, someone who knows these tricks and works here, they can catch poor 60 year old Mavis who plays 200quid a month and wont ever check the RTP as she thinks its standard.

    YOU AND POOR MAVIS NEED TO STOP GAMBLING OR START CHECKING THE RTP.

    in reply to: Video slots #83444
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    I don’t get more baffling. You get more confused because you find it hard to understand. Here i am talking to at least 10 of yous. FFS keep up, i’m only one man.

    in reply to: Video slots #83443
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    “This is getting even weirder now….do you not understand like half of my extensive post history on this forum”
    I said i wasn’t talking to yous anymore Arg… but after this, i had to.
    Do you all think you are famous with a really good reputation on this forum? Do yous all think too highly of yourself and your opinions/reputations?? Do you refuse to try and listen to other people or think outside the box?

    I am here a few weeks. I don’t know you apart from how you present yourself to me. I am not a stalker on you and every comment you make. I have never read a comment from you that is not a reply to mine. So the information you seem to think i have on you or anyone else is fake. It is something i don’t care about BECAUSE IT DOESN’T CONCERN ME. I really wish you could take something from this considering the boycott videoslots remark and comments, or trying to make a dick out of me for assuming you are a gambler as part of this forum and the guy with such a strong opinion against mine related to “gambling.”
    Take a look at how important you really are here and how important clinging onto gambling really is, considering it could have ruined you. Stop thinking everybody knows you as something here and move on if it can help stop an illness from becoming an issue again. Gambling addiction is an illness. See a Doctor, too… You could literally have a personality disorder as the two are related. You seem in denial here, so i tend to believe it could be true.

    in reply to: Video slots #83440
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    The craziest thing about all this is, eejit, argyl and I all have a reputation on this forum as ‘casino defenders’.

    The crazy part for me is you are unable to understand when you are wrong and they are not. Considering the above.

    Liberty, you are the perfect example of why this forum is the way it is. You and that Rbreen wanker, too. Most of yous, in fact, have a little click and seem to think that as yous are a small group of people on a gambling forum with an opinion similar… that nobody else can be right. Yet yous are wrong. However, it is useless telling you that. 10 or so will just pop up in the next 24 hours with varied subjests trying to confuse me at all cost and belittle me. Brexit an all. Lol. Unreal.

    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    I can’t be fcked with you Arg.. you turn up like a stalker looking a reaction. I told you on videoslots i’m done talking to you. Makes shit easy and i don’t lose my temper.

    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    Do you not think i did check them things considering i had to go there and bloody change it? When i changed it there was no spending limits. I don’t use wagering limits because i am a degenerate gamblers that gambles for fun and really pushing the limit. Many times i have spunked away thousands from 25, 50 and 100 deposits lol. Didn’t faze me in the slightest. I was told it must have been an error and was allowed to deposit and withdraw money without wagering which WOULD FALL UNDER MONEY LAUNDERING. Kind of why i was going to ask for help geting the deposit back, thankfully they were kind enough to admit it was an error.

    in reply to: Video slots #83433
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    argly54. No once you edited the post. If i didn’t make that clear, my bad. However. You and bio are distracting me, like about 10 others here and on the other thread…. from what i want to say!!! Then label me off subject lol. so i am not replying to anyone any longer. Eejit seems fine to finish off talking to, then i’m off you’ll all be glad to hear.

    in reply to: Video slots #83432
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    You understand they had to lower from 96% to 94%, yet come across as a paranoid Schizophrenic with trust issue to try and fade my previous comments. Now please counter the points i made or stop being paranoid. They make millions as it is. I don’t believe they cheat on roulette, i don’t think pokerstars QUANTUM RNG is rigged.
    Now… heres a shocker for ya. And i swollow my pride in saying it.
    I have researched this all more than most because i used to be as paranoid as you seem. I thought everything was a scam and i was butt hurt like most of yous. Then i understood i didn’t need to gamble and understood how much money they can make off 6% over millions of spins. Or the real RTP on a roulette table rather than risk it all with magnets and so on makes them a fortune. Now even if i am wrong now, and was right and they do cheat.. then I WAS STUPID ENOUGH TO KEEP PLAYING LOL.
    Responsibility for me own actions man. I have them now and feel the need to help spread reality.

    in reply to: Video slots #83429
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    You missed 2 points hugely here.

    It is very much possible to change a game from 94% to 88%. That was rhetorical. Im saying its 100% possible. Wasnt a debate.

    What about all the points i just made that you seem unable to counter again?

    You have trust issues and believe Casinos want really bad games to scare away their customers. They have no reason to offer 88% rtp. They can afford to get by and pay the tax and licence with 94% rtp.

    in reply to: Video slots #83427
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    Argyl53. Why is that taking over everything? What’s the issue. When i write a reply you don’t reply to, then all i seemed to get is a diversion. Reguardless. There was the same people here as there was on the other thread “has the streaming bubble burst” coming and changing the subject on me. If you read through you will see when i tried to end the other stream by coming here and explaining my intention was not for it to end up with multiple people attacking eachother and name calling in the Bandits house, you came straight in to tell me here i was wrong and you were right. You lead me to assume you gambled, as you are here. You made me assume you didn’t like video slots as you were calling for people to boycott them lol. Then have the cheek to tell me i am making shit up when it is reasonable to assume what i said.

    in reply to: Video slots #83425
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    It is my belief, and i say again, mine, that this is wrong.
    Fair enough, that doesn’t mean they are when all the evidence, including the fact you can’t prove it, isn’t available to prove it. If we are talking about a moral objective, that’s another issue. That could be easily sorted through them and you and maybe, just maybe, they would listen. When you go elsewhere to raise an issue that can lead to fines when they are already a struggling site( all be it the biggest slot provider in the uk site) then you risk them going elsewhere or being fined out of the uk market. WHITE LABEL CASINOS WOULD BE FINED OUT OF THE MARKET BY NOT LISTENING TO THE UK GAMBLING COMMISSION. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT YET?

    So my goal here is not to get them banned from whatever jurisdiction. Shit they could kill someone and probably not get banned.
    They were forced to do it. Or leave the UK. So whether they get banned or not, any fines if they were due them which they aren’t, would drive them out of the UK market. So it is the same result.

    If they can swap the games to 94% its possible to swap them back right?
    No. You said last night or the day before you understood they had to do it because of TAX and costs of being in the UK. Your issue is with the UK Government, take it to them if you dare.

    Whats to stop them going to 88% games for 2 hours then swapping back. That would be illegal and there would not be any reason to do it.

    You started to waffle near the end eejit and sound very paranoid for somebody that understands the reason they had to reduce the RTP only slightly. Keep an eye on their news page or check the RTP before you play. It’s not a lot to ask , considering that is meant to be your responsibility at all times regardless.
    Years ago they didn’t have to show the RTP. Now they do, make use of that fact and stop pushing blame elsewhere. It is literally there any time you need it for a reason, yet that reason isn’t good enough for you.

    You said that the Casino you work for don’t have to listen to any rules the UK Gambling Commission make up. You are wrong if they want a UK licence. I don’t use Riskz. I am sure there are a couple of decent ones… they are just hard to find.

    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    Also… i did infact check my spending limit and there was none. It is something i have never used on any site in over 10 years online. I use deposit limits as a means of not overspending. I deposit to have fun and usually don’t worry too much about withdrawals. I am a degenerate greedy cunt when i gamble. If i will 1000 off a 100 deposit, i will gamble the 1  grand i win hoping to buy a house out of it. The only way that would happen is if i didn’t hit roulette after hours of fun and huge wins. However, i still only lose 100 quid which was burnt money when i made the deposit to have a night of fun.

    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    Whats so hard to understand? I tried to play with money the site allowed me to deposit and then i was told i can’t spend 100 pound which i deposited. Which is strange to me as i wasn’t allowed to deposit 100 pound and had to wait 7 days before i could. Then after 7 days i couldn’t spend 100 pound as they said my spending limits weren’t high enough. However, i had no spending limits set when i first tried to make the deposit and it wouldn’t let me. I didn’t know i could increase my deposit limits to 100 pound or more and then be told i can’t spend the money. I would have though increasing my deposit limits would result in a wager limit of at least what i am allowed to deposit.

    in reply to: Video slots #83418
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    Did you complain to the UK gambling commission or Maltese? What makes you think white label don’t need to listen to the rules that the UK gambling commission just make up? It is something you said in “has the streaming bubble burst thread”.

    in reply to: Video slots #83417
    trr420 WANTED $7
    Blocked

    1. Reporting them is not what is wrong. It is the reason you reported them that is wrong.
    2. He edited a post i wanted to reply to and then i had to change what i was writing. That was all and not a big deal as i can respond to any remark he makes. No issue there.

    1. You made a complaint because they didn’t advertise the change of RTP. Then when told they did, you say their advertising doesn’t meet you requirements. You make the case an email is better suited, yet it could end up in junk or you might not use it any more as you use a different email address. You wrote to licencing bodies and state they did wrong when in time you will be proven wrong. That is coming to you soon, should you continue with the complaint.
    The Rtp isn’t guaranteed and you are not under a contract and you are free to play elsewhere. So why try and complain knowing fine well why they reduced the RTP?
    Lastly… if they did it and others follow, are you going to write to the licencing bodies of all the Casinos that are forced into taking games they don’t want to have… otherwise they would have had them from the start.?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 113 total)